[Bug tree-optimization/66012] New: Sub-optimal 64bit load is generated instead of zero-extension

2015-05-04 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66012 Bug ID: 66012 Summary: Sub-optimal 64bit load is generated instead of zero-extension Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug target/65871] bzhi builtin/intrinsic wrongly assumes bzhi instruction doesn't set the ZF flag

2015-05-04 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65871 --- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Tue May 5 04:36:19 2015 New Revision: 222795 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222795&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/65871 * config/i386/i386.md (*bmi_andn__

[Bug libstdc++/66011] New: call to '__open_missing_mode' declared with attribute error

2015-05-04 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66011 Bug ID: 66011 Summary: call to '__open_missing_mode' declared with attribute error Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug libstdc++/49204] [C++0x] remaining issues in

2015-05-04 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49204 Bug 49204 depends on bug 51617, which changed state. Bug 51617 Summary: [C++0x] async(f) isn't. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/51617] [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

2015-05-04 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/51617] [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

2015-05-04 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue May 5 01:56:47 2015 New Revision: 222793 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222793&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/51617 * include/std/future (async): Change

[Bug tree-optimization/66003] missed cse opportunity in addr expressions because of tree pre/lim

2015-05-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66003 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- slsr does a good job at cleaning up a little bit the code. I would have suspected slsr would have generated the addresses correctly and move the add inside the loop.

[Bug tree-optimization/66003] missed cse opportunity in addr expressions because of tree pre/lim

2015-05-04 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66003 --- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Hmm, I think IVOPTs should be able to undo this code motion? It can't. Address of all pointer dereferences except the first one are not even inductio

[Bug target/65987] [6 Regression] [SH] Wrong jump generated for gcc.dg/tree-prof/va-arg-pack-1.c with -fprofile-use

2015-05-04 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65987 Kazumoto Kojima changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/66009] [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86

2015-05-04 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66009 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Yup, it's my patch. Reverted while I figure out what went wrong.

[Bug target/65987] [6 Regression] [SH] Wrong jump generated for gcc.dg/tree-prof/va-arg-pack-1.c with -fprofile-use

2015-05-04 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65987 --- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima --- Author: kkojima Date: Mon May 4 23:25:58 2015 New Revision: 222783 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222783&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/65987 * config/sh/sh.c (output_far_jump, split_branches): Ta

[Bug tree-optimization/66010] [6 Regression] Missed optimization after inlining va_list parameter

2015-05-04 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66010 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Missed optimization after |[6 Regression] Missed

[Bug bootstrap/66009] [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86

2015-05-04 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66009 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/66010] Missed optimization after inlining va_list parameter

2015-05-04 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66010 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 35460 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35460&action=edit Demonstrator patch I tracked down which passes are responsible for making the code for f1 and f2 look

[Bug tree-optimization/66010] Missed optimization after inlining va_list parameter

2015-05-04 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66010 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Commen

[Bug tree-optimization/66010] New: Missed optimization after inlining va_list parameter

2015-05-04 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66010 Bug ID: 66010 Summary: Missed optimization after inlining va_list parameter Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/66007] [5/6 Regression] Narrowing conversion inside { } results in all zero elements in C++11 mode with -Wno-error=narrowing

2015-05-04 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66007 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/17995] gcc-3.4.2/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_alloc.cc:34

2015-05-04 Thread cary.lewis at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17995 --- Comment #20 from Cary Lewis --- Thanks very much for the help on this. i will try the --enable-cheaders. On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:59 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17995 > > --- Comment #

[Bug c++/66007] [5/6 Regression] Narrowing conversion inside { } results in all zero elements in C++11 mode with -Wno-error=narrowing

2015-05-04 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66007 --- Comment #13 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon May 4 20:59:03 2015 New Revision: 222779 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222779&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2015-05-04 Paolo Carlini Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/17995] gcc-3.4.2/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_alloc.cc:34

2015-05-04 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17995 --- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Cary Lewis from comment #18) > There must be something unique about the SCO environment that leads to this > error. > > Maybe the way that the gcc 2.95.3 compiler gets installed. The problem

[Bug c++/66007] [5/6 Regression] Narrowing conversion inside { } results in all zero elements in C++11 mode with -Wno-error=narrowing

2015-05-04 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66007 --- Comment #12 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon May 4 20:58:33 2015 New Revision: 222778 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222778&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2015-05-04 Paolo Carlini Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/65456] powerpc64le autovectorized copy loop missed optimization

2015-05-04 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65456 --- Comment #24 from Bill Schmidt --- No, I don't think so. The same change was made in GCC 4.9, and it didn't cause it to XPASS there (looking at gcc-testresults). Also, my change restricted the number of cases for which a test is expected to

[Bug middle-end/65947] Vectorizer misses conditional assignment of constant

2015-05-04 Thread hiraditya at msn dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65947 AK changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hiraditya at msn dot com --- Comment #2 from AK --

[Bug middle-end/65984] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: definition in block 4 does not dominate use in block 2 with -fnon-call-exceptions -fsanitize=enum

2015-05-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65984 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon May 4 19:53:35 2015 New Revision: 222776 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222776&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/65984 * ubsan.c: Include tree-cfg.h.

[Bug middle-end/65984] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: definition in block 4 does not dominate use in block 2 with -fnon-call-exceptions -fsanitize=enum

2015-05-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65984 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon May 4 19:52:33 2015 New Revision: 222775 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222775&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/65984 * ubsan.c: Include tree-cfg.h.

[Bug tree-optimization/48052] loop not vectorized if index is "unsigned int"

2015-05-04 Thread az.zaafrani at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48052 zaafrani changed: What|Removed |Added CC||az.zaafrani at gmail dot com --- Comment #10

[Bug bootstrap/66009] New: [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86

2015-05-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66009 Bug ID: 66009 Summary: [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug c++/54835] [C++11][DR 1518] Explicit default constructors not respected during copy-list-initialization

2015-05-04 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54835 --- Comment #10 from Daniel Krügler --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #9) > I believe that the resolution of DR 1630 clarifies that value-initialization > can invoke an explicit constructor even in copy-list-initialization context, > so

[Bug lto/65995] LTO: ICE in add_symbol_to_partition_1 for debug build

2015-05-04 Thread daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65995 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Starke --- I already applied the open() patch listed there so this is definitively a different bug. I will try again with the current trunk hopefully within this week.

[Bug libstdc++/65883] [5 Regression] numeric_limits::max() returns incorrect value

2015-05-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65883 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/65883] [5 Regression] numeric_limits::max() returns incorrect value

2015-05-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65883 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon May 4 18:20:10 2015 New Revision: 222772 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222772&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2015-04-28 Marc Glisse

[Bug c++/66007] [5/6 Regression] Narrowing conversion inside { } results in all zero elements in C++11 mode with -Wno-error=narrowing

2015-05-04 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66007 --- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini --- Turns out we want to check by hand errorcount at least to avoid additional overflow diagnostic (eg, cpp0x/enum29.C)

[Bug libstdc++/17995] gcc-3.4.2/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_alloc.cc:34

2015-05-04 Thread cary.lewis at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17995 --- Comment #18 from Cary Lewis --- I took your advice, and attempted to bootstrap gcc 4.2.4 with languages=c,c++ I received a very similar error: make[4]: Entering directory `/tmp/gcc-build/i686-pc-sco3.2v5.0.7/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++' /bin/sh

[Bug libstdc++/66004] [6 Regression]: performance of 26_numerics/random/negative_binomial_distribution/operators/values.cc

2015-05-04 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66004 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- At r222180: 40068917595

[Bug c++/66007] [5/6 Regression] Narrowing conversion inside { } results in all zero elements in C++11 mode with -Wno-error=narrowing

2015-05-04 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66007 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|paolo.carlini at oracle dot com|jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/66007] [5/6 Regression] Narrowing conversion inside { } results in all zero elements in C++11 mode with -Wno-error=narrowing

2015-05-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66007 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #8) > Index: typeck2.c > === > --- typeck2.c (revision 222767) > +++ typeck2.c (working copy) > @@ -959,

[Bug c++/66007] [5/6 Regression] Narrowing conversion inside { } results in all zero elements in C++11 mode with -Wno-error=narrowing

2015-05-04 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66007 --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini --- Index: typeck2.c === --- typeck2.c (revision 222767) +++ typeck2.c (working copy) @@ -959,10 +959,10 @@ check_narrowing (tree type, tree ini

[Bug c++/66007] [5/6 Regression] Narrowing conversion inside { } results in all zero elements in C++11 mode with -Wno-error=narrowing

2015-05-04 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66007 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini --- Unfortunately, I'm afraid it's a real issue. Note the test has -Wno-error=narrowing, not -Wno-narrowing. Thus the pedwarn at typeck2.c:962 returns true and ok remains false while we only emitted a warning and

[Bug c++/66007] [5/6 Regression] Narrowing conversion inside { } results in all zero elements in C++11 mode with -Wno-error=narrowing

2015-05-04 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66007 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/66007] [5 Regression] Narrowing conversion inside { } results in all zero elements in C++11 mode

2015-05-04 Thread evangelos at foutrelis dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66007 Evangelos Foutras changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #35453|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/66007] [5 Regression] Narrowing conversion inside { } results in all zero elements in C++11 mode

2015-05-04 Thread evangelos at foutrelis dot com
owing .file "" :1:32: warning: narrowing conversion of ‘4294967295u’ from ‘unsigned int’ to ‘int’ inside { } [-Wnarrowing] .globl foo .bss .align 8 .type foo, @object .size foo, 12 foo: .zero 12 .ide

[Bug c++/66007] [5 Regression] Narrowing conversion inside { } results in all zero elements in C++11 mode

2015-05-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66007 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c/66008] "section type conflict" if calling a macro inlined or in a two times derived class

2015-05-04 Thread dgdanielf at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66008 Daniel Frenzel changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://stackoverflow.com/qu

[Bug c/66008] New: "section type conflict" if calling a macro inlined or in a two times derived class

2015-05-04 Thread dgdanielf at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66008 Bug ID: 66008 Summary: "section type conflict" if calling a macro inlined or in a two times derived class Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug c++/65854] [c++-concepts] Type constraint satisfaction error for type aliases; regression from r211591

2015-05-04 Thread andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65854 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Sutton --- Confirmed. Parsing a type requirement that names an alias template was giving back a declaration, which wasn't being instantiated correctly. r222769 unwraps the type from the declaration and will correctly

[Bug c++/54835] [C++11][DR 1518] Explicit default constructors not respected during copy-list-initialization

2015-05-04 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54835 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill --- I believe that the resolution of DR 1630 clarifies that value-initialization can invoke an explicit constructor even in copy-list-initialization context, so I should revert my change for this PR.

[Bug fortran/47359] Recursive functions of intrinsic names generates invalid assembler

2015-05-04 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47359 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2011-05-23 09:58:19 |2015-5-4 CC|

[Bug fortran/60322] [OOP] Incorrect bounds on polymorphic dummy array

2015-05-04 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60322 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/64674] [OOP] ICE in ASSOCIATE with class array

2015-05-04 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64674 --- Comment #4 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- First patch available at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-05/msg00011.html

[Bug fortran/64674] [OOP] ICE in ASSOCIATE with class array

2015-05-04 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64674 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug ipa/65972] ICE after applying a patch to enable verify_ssa

2015-05-04 Thread hiraditya at msn dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65972 --- Comment #3 from AK --- Created attachment 35457 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35457&action=edit Preprocesed unwind-arm.i

[Bug rtl-optimization/53533] [4.8/4.9/5/6 regression] vectorization causes loop unrolling test slowdown as measured by Adobe's C++Benchmark

2015-05-04 Thread maltsevm at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53533 --- Comment #29 from Mikhail Maltsev --- Results for attached testcase: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5820K CPU @ 3.30GHz (Haswell) g++ -O3 -march=native -mtune=native 1 iterations Clang 3.7 Total absolute time for int32_t for loop unrolling: 0.99 s

[Bug target/65456] powerpc64le autovectorized copy loop missed optimization

2015-05-04 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65456 --- Comment #23 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 35456 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35456&action=edit bb-slp-32.c.141t.slp2 dump

[Bug c++/66007] [5 Regression] Narrowing conversion inside { } results in all zero elements in C++11 mode

2015-05-04 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66007 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/65456] powerpc64le autovectorized copy loop missed optimization

2015-05-04 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65456 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/53533] [4.8/4.9/5/6 regression] vectorization causes loop unrolling test slowdown as measured by Adobe's C++Benchmark

2015-05-04 Thread maltsevm at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53533 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/62283] basic-block vectorization fails

2015-05-04 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug fortran/62283] basic-block vectorization fails

2015-05-04 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 --- Comment #24 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 35454 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35454&action=edit bb-slp-14.c.141t.slp2 dump

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

2015-05-04 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 62283, which changed state. Bug 62283 Summary: basic-block vectorization fails https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/65428] ICE on nest array constructor

2015-05-04 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65428 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-03-15 00:00:00 |2015-5-4 --- Comment #1 from F

[Bug c++/66007] [5 Regression] Narrowing conversion inside { } results in all zero elements in C++11 mode

2015-05-04 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66007 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2015-05-04 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834 Bug 32834 depends on bug 44735, which changed state. Bug 44735 Summary: ICE on FORALL with character array pointer https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44735 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/19276] [meta-bug] CHARACTER related bugs in gfortran

2015-05-04 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19276 Bug 19276 depends on bug 44735, which changed state. Bug 44735 Summary: ICE on FORALL with character array pointer https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44735 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/44735] ICE on FORALL with character array pointer

2015-05-04 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44735 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/44735] ICE on FORALL with character array pointer

2015-05-04 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44735 --- Comment #8 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- Author: fxcoudert Date: Mon May 4 14:27:14 2015 New Revision: 222766 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222766&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR fortran/44735 * gfortran.dg/pr44735.f90:

[Bug middle-end/65965] Straight-line memcpy/memset not vectorized when equivalent loop is

2015-05-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65965 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/65965] Straight-line memcpy/memset not vectorized when equivalent loop is

2015-05-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65965 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon May 4 14:24:49 2015 New Revision: 222765 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222765&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-05-04 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/65965

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

2015-05-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 65965, which changed state. Bug 65965 Summary: Straight-line memcpy/memset not vectorized when equivalent loop is https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65965 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/65801] [5/6 Regression] Allow -Wno-narrowing to silence stricter C++11 narrowing rules

2015-05-04 Thread evangelos at foutrelis dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65801 Evangelos Foutras changed: What|Removed |Added CC||evangelos at foutrelis dot com --- C

[Bug lto/52159] ICE when building qemu with GCC 4.7 trunk: cannot read LTO decls

2015-05-04 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52159 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/66007] New: [5 Regression] Narrowing conversion inside { } results in all zero elements in C++11 mode

2015-05-04 Thread evangelos at foutrelis dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66007 Bug ID: 66007 Summary: [5 Regression] Narrowing conversion inside { } results in all zero elements in C++11 mode Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/50394] [meta-bug] Issues with building libreoffice with LTO

2015-05-04 Thread steffen at hauihau dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394 Steffen Hau changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steffen at hauihau dot de --- Comment #30

[Bug tree-optimization/66002] paq8p benchmark 50% slower than clang on sandybridge

2015-05-04 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66002 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > prephitmp_61 = _53 <= 65535 ? pretmp_60 : -32768; > > is > > unsigned int <= 65535 ? short int : short int; > > pushing the condition to a separa

[Bug libstdc++/66006] [6 regression] abi_check FAILs

2015-05-04 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66006 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug libstdc++/66006] New: [6 regression] abi_check FAILs

2015-05-04 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66006 Bug ID: 66006 Summary: [6 regression] abi_check FAILs Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug tree-optimization/66002] paq8p benchmark 50% slower than clang on sandybridge

2015-05-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66002 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug tree-optimization/66002] paq8p benchmark 50% slower than clang on sandybridge

2015-05-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66002 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/66002] paq8p benchmark 50% slower than clang on sandybridge

2015-05-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66002 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- high up in the profile are functions train() and dot_product(), also ContextMap::mix1 and Mixer::p. But void train(short *t, short *w, int n, int err) { n=(n+7)&-8; for (int i=0; i>16)+1>>1); if (w

[Bug libgomp/66005] New: libgomp make check time is excessive

2015-05-04 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 Bug ID: 66005 Summary: libgomp make check time is excessive Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgomp

[Bug tree-optimization/65935] [6 Regression] 433.milc in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

2015-05-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65935 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/65935] [6 Regression] 433.milc in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

2015-05-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65935 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon May 4 13:31:02 2015 New Revision: 222764 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222764&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-05-04 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/65935

[Bug libgomp/65993] [6 Regression] Numerous libgomp.oacc failures seen in r222712

2015-05-04 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65993 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa64-hp-hpux11.11, |

[Bug target/65983] [6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in mark_label_nuses (emit-rtl.c:3618) with -fsanitize=thread -mavx512ifma -march=barcelona

2015-05-04 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65983 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||65915 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---

[Bug target/41089] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] stdarg pass produces wrong code

2015-05-04 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41089 Bug 41089 depends on bug 64950, which changed state. Bug 64950 Summary: postpone expanding va_arg till pass_stdarg https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64950 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/64950] postpone expanding va_arg till pass_stdarg

2015-05-04 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64950 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug other/51153] OpenACC implementation

2015-05-04 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51153 Bug 51153 depends on bug 64950, which changed state. Bug 64950 Summary: postpone expanding va_arg till pass_stdarg https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64950 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug lto/52159] ICE when building qemu with GCC 4.7 trunk: cannot read LTO decls

2015-05-04 Thread steffen at hauihau dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52159 --- Comment #4 from Steffen Hau --- Created attachment 35452 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35452&action=edit preprocessed sources and minimal build script

[Bug libstdc++/66004] [6 Regression]: performance of 26_numerics/random/negative_binomial_distribution/operators/values.cc

2015-05-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66004 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |6.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug lto/52159] ICE when building qemu with GCC 4.7 trunk: cannot read LTO decls

2015-05-04 Thread steffen at hauihau dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52159 Steffen Hau changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steffen at hauihau dot de --- Comment #3 f

[Bug testsuite/65767] Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi

2015-05-04 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65767 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/66002] paq8p benchmark 50% slower than clang on sandybridge

2015-05-04 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66002 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- clang without -vectorize-loops -vectorize-slp: ./paq8p -4 file1.in 54.82s user 0.08s system 100% cpu 54.891 total

[Bug tree-optimization/66002] paq8p benchmark 50% slower than clang on sandybridge

2015-05-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66002 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- gprof tells me Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds. % cumulative self self total time seconds secondscalls s/call s/call name 67.13 25.4025.40 20

[Bug libstdc++/66004] New: [6 Regression]: performance of 26_numerics/random/negative_binomial_distribution/operators/values.cc

2015-05-04 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66004 Bug ID: 66004 Summary: [6 Regression]: performance of 26_numerics/random/negative_binomial_distribution/oper ators/values.cc Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug go/61303] gccgo: segfault, regression since 4.8.2

2015-05-04 Thread maciej at opencsw dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61303 --- Comment #8 from Maciej Bliziński --- Here's my attempt to get some information: experimental10s 14:35:13 ~/src/opencsw-gar/v2/go $ gcc -v Reading specs from /opt/csw/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/5.1.0/specs COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPP

[Bug fortran/65996] [5/6 Regression] gfortran ICE with -dH

2015-05-04 Thread Melven.Roehrig-Zoellner at DLR dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65996 --- Comment #8 from Melven.Roehrig-Zoellner at DLR dot de --- Thanks for the quick replies and the discussion about the "not-so-usefulness" of the -dH switch (at least for our project). We most probably used this switch by mistake - you might poss

[Bug c++/66001] [5/6 regression] ICE when NSDMI in a literal class uses a destructor

2015-05-04 Thread maltsevm at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66001 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/66003] missed cse opportunity in addr expressions because of tree pre/lim

2015-05-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66003 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #1 from

[Bug libgomp/65993] [6 Regression] Numerous libgomp.oacc failures seen in r222712

2015-05-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65993 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|5.0 |6.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/65987] [6 Regression] [SH] Wrong jump generated for gcc.dg/tree-prof/va-arg-pack-1.c with -fprofile-use

2015-05-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65987 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug lto/65982] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in lto_output_varpool_node, at lto-cgraph.c:623

2015-05-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65982 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.2

  1   2   >