https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66759
Bug ID: 66759
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in generic-match.c on 456.hmmer
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66747
Doug Gilmore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matthew.fortune at imgtec dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66754
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66754
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
Doc says:
Using the built-in functions described below, you can record the
arguments a function received, and call another function with the same
arguments, without knowing the number or types of the arguments.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65732
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66030
--- Comment #17 from Hamza Alloush ---
Boost compilling properly now!
Thanks to all involved! :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
--- Comment #1 from Eric Niebler ---
Created attachment 35907
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35907&action=edit
preprocessed source, bug #2(?)
This might be the same bug, but the error is different. It yields:
/cygdrive/c/Us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
Bug ID: 66758
Summary: [concepts] ICE compiler deeply confused by
simple-seeming concept definition
Product: gcc
Version: c++-concepts
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
--enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20150703 (experimental) [trunk revision 225367] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O0 small.c; ./a.out
$ gcc-5.1 -O1 small.c; ./a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -O1 small.c
$ ./a.out
Aborted (core dumped)
$
--
int a, b;
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66334
--- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8)
> (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #7)
> > I've looked at this. Insn 34 is transformed into
> >
> > ebx=ebx
> >
> > as pseudo 87 gets ebx. At the very en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66747
--- Comment #4 from Doug Gilmore ---
Thanks!
I started up a build with the patch and it got through
the initial_gcc build so that is a good sign.
I'll send an update once the build is done.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
I have yet to sort out private symbols before I close this PR. It will take
some days to conclude because of the issues discussed on the list.
I'm on to it!
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66334
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #7)
> I've looked at this. Insn 34 is transformed into
>
> ebx=ebx
>
> as pseudo 87 gets ebx. At the very end. LRA removes the useless insn.
> Therefore there is no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66754
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
extern void foo (char *name, double d, double e, double f, int g);
void
bar (char *name, ...)
{
__builtin_apply(foo, __builtin_apply_args(), 64);
}
is miscompiled. IA MCU passes everything on stack for vararg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66509
--- Comment #25 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Jul 3 17:50:48 2015
New Revision: 225400
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225400&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-03 Jack Howarth
PR target/66509
* conf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66745
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #5)
> I've had a look at it - however it's not an area that I've worked in before,
> so beware it will take me a while to understand the issue here.
>
> I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66712
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66712
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 3 17:46:04 2015
New Revision: 225399
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225399&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66712
* gcc/cp/pt.c (tsubst_pack_expansion): Use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
--- Comment #17 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fink's 4.7 has to be patched by itself, if you would like the fix there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66745
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
I've had a look at it - however it's not an area that I've worked in before, so
beware it will take me a while to understand the issue here.
If someone can help with a reduced testcase that would be a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
--- Comment #15 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Jul 3 17:35:37 2015
New Revision: 225390
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225390&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-03 Carlos Sánchez de La Lama
PR target/52482
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66712
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
--- Comment #14 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Jul 3 17:31:21 2015
New Revision: 225389
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225389&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-03 Carlos Sánchez de La Lama
PR target/52482
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
--- Comment #13 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Jul 3 17:28:43 2015
New Revision: 225388
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225388&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-03 Carlos Sánchez de La Lama
PR target/52482
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66334
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66509
--- Comment #24 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Jul 3 17:00:49 2015
New Revision: 225386
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225386&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-03 Jack Howarth
PR target/66509
* conf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66756
Bug ID: 66756
Summary: libgfortran: ThreadSanitizer: lock-order-inversion
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66754
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66750
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Yulia Koval from comment #4)
> Well, it fixes issue for -miamcu, but not for "-m32 -mregparm=3", am i right?
callee_pop_aggregate_return isn't applicable to -mregparm since
there is nothing on stack t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66750
--- Comment #4 from Yulia Koval ---
Well, it fixes issue for -miamcu, but not for "-m32 -mregparm=3", am i right?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66754
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66755
Bug ID: 66755
Summary: [ARM] TARGET_ASM_OUTPUT_MI_THUNK should be rewritten
to an RTL implementation
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66745
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66742
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
A candidate patch has been posted to
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg00217.html
With that fix your testcase segfaults, because you allocate n bytes not
n*sizeof(Tp).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66744
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 35905
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35905&action=edit
Suggested patch
Can you please test that the patch works?
Thanks,
Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66754
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66750
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66750
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
IA MCU psABI is wrong since the implicit pointer argument isn't passed
on stack. I will fix it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66750
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66706
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Jul 3 14:37:26 2015
New Revision: 225382
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225382&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/66706
* gcc.target/powerpc/shift
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66186
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66749
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 35904
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35904&action=edit
A patch
Please try this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66754
Bug ID: 66754
Summary: [4.9/5/6] gcc.dg/builtin-apply2.c aborts with -m32
-mregparm=3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752
Stupachenko Evgeny changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66509
--- Comment #23 from Jack Howarth ---
Mike, tested back port of...
Author: mrs
Date: Tue Jun 30 02:10:43 2015
New Revision: 225158
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225158&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/66509
* configure.ac: Fix filds and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66749
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Version|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66750
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Version|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50584
--- Comment #10 from Serg Iv ---
Some thoughts after I read C99 rationale.
Actually, [static N] it's a PROMISE to a compiler, that programmer will always
provide N pieces of data. *ALWAYS*.
Therefore compiler can do with this data whatever it wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66729
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #7)
> (gdb) print code
> $3 = ADDR_EXPR
> (gdb) print tclass
> $4 = 1969711199
Er, to be clear, this was part _after_ typing "next". Guess I sho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66746
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to kugan from comment #3)
> > > really you should handle more
> > > than two arguments to phis.
> > I am not sure how we can handle phi stmt w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66746
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jul 3 12:25:10 2015
New Revision: 225376
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225376&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add IA MCU support to x86intrin.h
x86intrin.h has useful intrinsic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66729
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Pat Haugen from comment #6)
> (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #4)
> >
> > Hmm, bootstrap succeeded for me on gcc110. I used r225278, but I don't
> > think anything
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to kugan from comment #3)
> > really you should handle more
> > than two arguments to phis.
> I am not sure how we can handle phi stmt with more than two arguments here.
> Any hints please?
Yes the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> really you should handle more
> than two arguments to phis.
I am not sure how we can handle phi stmt with more than two arguments here. Any
hints please?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61820
Richard PALO changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard at netbsd dot org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66753
Bug ID: 66753
Summary: contrib/make_sunver.pl doesn't digest libraries very
well
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752
Bug ID: 66752
Summary: spec2000 255.vortex performance compiled with GCC is
~20% lower than with CLANG
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66751
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
GNU 90 vs C99/C11 inline semantics.
The default standard changed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66751
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64030
--- Comment #1 from Richard PALO ---
kind reminder to commit this patchset
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66751
Bug ID: 66751
Summary: Inline optimizes away function, keeping call to it in
code
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351
Jon Grant changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jg at jguk dot org
--- Comment #30 from Jon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66747
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Created attachment 35902
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35902&action=edit
proposed patch
this slightly improved patch should fix it, could you give it a try?
Thanks,
Bernd.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
csanchezdll at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||csanchezdll at gmail dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66750
Bug ID: 66750
Summary: [4.9/5/6] Aggregate return not generated with -m32
-mregparm=3 or with -miamcu
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66748
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66742
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
So we need something ugly like this:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/list.tcc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/list.tcc
@@ -398,6 +398,8 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER
}
}
+#define
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66742
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66747
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger ---
get_attr_got fails when called with a SEQUENCE.
I am not sure if reg_overlap_mentioned_p works with SEQUENCE.
--- gcc/config/mips/mips.c.jj 2015-06-08 23:06:50.0 +0200
+++ gcc/config/mips/mips.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66119
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66119
--- Comment #13 from James Greenhalgh ---
Author: jgreenhalgh
Date: Fri Jul 3 09:52:20 2015
New Revision: 225372
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225372&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Backport Patch SRA] Fix PR66119 by calling get_move_ratio in SR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66749
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66749
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50584
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37072
--- Comment #4 from gerald at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: gerald
Date: Fri Jul 3 09:33:17 2015
New Revision: 225370
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225370&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/37072
* doc/invoke.texi (i386 and x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66119
--- Comment #12 from James Greenhalgh ---
Author: jgreenhalgh
Date: Fri Jul 3 09:25:54 2015
New Revision: 225369
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225369&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Patch SRA] Fix PR66119 by calling get_move_ratio in SRA
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66749
--- Comment #1 from Yulia Koval ---
Reproduce:
./gcc -Bgcc addr-sel-1.c -O2 -m32 -mregparm=3 -mtune=i686 -S -o addr-sel-1.s
-mtune=i686 is dg-option of the test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66119
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65908
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66749
Bug ID: 66749
Summary: [4.9/5/6] gcc.target/i386/addr-sel-1.c fails to merge
array index into one instruction with -m32 -mregparm=3
or with -miamcu
Product: gcc
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66748
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
I think just
--- gcc/cp/tree.c
+++ gcc/cp/tree.c
@@ -3654,13 +3654,15 @@ handle_abi_tag_attribute (tree* node, tree name, tree
args,
name, *node);
goto fail;
}
- else
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66747
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64692
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66748
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66742
Marc Di Luzio changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64674
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66742
--- Comment #3 from Marc Di Luzio ---
Created attachment 35901
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35901&action=edit
main.ii
Updating with a valid ==/!= operator pair and state handling, apologies for the
original bad test case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66720
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |testsuite
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66747
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.2
Summary|The commit r2252
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66745
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66748
Bug ID: 66748
Summary: Crash with abi_tag attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66746
--- Comment #2 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> A patch is posted at
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg00174.html
Thanks H.J.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66745
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
98 matches
Mail list logo
