[Bug target/68172] [6 Regression] LTO/PGO bootstrapped compiler is miscompiled (looping in sched_rgn_init)

2015-11-09 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68172 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/68251] New: [6 Regression] sorry, unimplemented: reverse storage order for BLKmode

2015-11-09 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68251 Bug ID: 68251 Summary: [6 Regression] sorry, unimplemented: reverse storage order for BLKmode Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/66728] [5 Regression] CONST_WIDE_INT causes corrupted DWARF debug info

2015-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66728 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/68252] New: regiression left operand of shift expression, while we shift > 0 integer

2015-11-09 Thread dushistov at mail dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68252 Bug ID: 68252 Summary: regiression left operand of shift expression, while we shift > 0 integer Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug middle-end/68251] [6 Regression] sorry, unimplemented: reverse storage order for BLKmode

2015-11-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68251 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug regression/68253] New: Valgrind: Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value in fold-const.c:5587

2015-11-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68253 Bug ID: 68253 Summary: Valgrind: Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value in fold-const.c:5587 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug middle-end/68253] [6 Regression] Valgrind: Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value in fold-const.c:5587

2015-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68253 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|regression |middle-end Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/68251] [6 Regression] sorry, unimplemented: reverse storage order for BLKmode

2015-11-09 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
--enable-lto --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20151109 (experimental) [trunk revision 229981] (GCC)

[Bug c++/68252] regiression left operand of shift expression, while we shift > 0 integer

2015-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68252 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug fortran/44856] Usage of array PARAMETERs: Literal copy vs. global variable

2015-11-09 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44856 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/68251] [6 Regression] sorry, unimplemented: reverse storage order for BLKmode

2015-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68251 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/66768] address space gets lost on literal pointer

2015-11-09 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66768 --- Comment #11 from Richard Henderson --- Author: rth Date: Mon Nov 9 09:18:16 2015 New Revision: 229997 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229997&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-opt/66768 * tree-ssa-address.c (create_mem_ref_raw): U

[Bug rtl-optimization/68250] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)

2015-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68250 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/68249] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2015-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68249 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/68248] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in uniform_vector_p, at tree.c:10807

2015-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68248 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/68189] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu by RTL if-conversion

2015-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68189 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #6) > Started with r208165 (on x86_64-linux with -O3). This also only exposed the bug I believe.

[Bug c++/68252] regiression left operand of shift expression, while we shift > 0 integer

2015-11-09 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68252 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- (with { tree utype = unsigned_type_for (TREE_TYPE (@0)); } (convert (lshift (convert:utype @0) @2 maybe?

[Bug tree-optimization/68240] [6 Regression] compilation hangs on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

2015-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68240 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/68240] [6 Regression] compilation hangs on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

2015-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68240 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Starting iteration 95064 Value numbering iftmp.1_2 stmt = iftmp.1_2 = PHI <1(3), 0(4)> Setting value number of iftmp.1_2 to iftmp.0_1 (changed) Starting iteration 95065 Value numbering iftmp.1_2 stmt = iftmp

[Bug middle-end/68251] [6 Regression] sorry, unimplemented: reverse storage order for BLKmode

2015-11-09 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68251 --- Comment #3 from Joost VandeVondele --- Created attachment 36667 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36667&action=edit partially reduced testcase I attach a partially reduced testcase, reduction will continue for a while. g

[Bug tree-optimization/68234] tree-vrp pass need to be improved when handling ASSERT_EXPR

2015-11-09 Thread jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68234 Jiong Wang changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|tree-vrp pass need to be|tree-vrp pass need to be

[Bug middle-end/68253] [6 Regression] Valgrind: Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value in fold-const.c:5587

2015-11-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68253 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/68238] Vector cost model overestimates prologue cost for SLPed code

2015-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68238 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/68251] [6 Regression] sorry, unimplemented: reverse storage order for BLKmode

2015-11-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68251 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug tree-optimization/68234] tree-vrp pass need to be improved when handling ASSERT_EXPR

2015-11-09 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68234 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68234 > > Jiong Wang changed: > >What|Removed |Added > --

[Bug target/66326] Floating point exception with -mfpmath=387 and -fcilkplus.

2015-11-09 Thread ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66326 --- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Mon Nov 9 10:12:34 2015 New Revision: 230008 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230008&root=gcc&view=rev Log: libcilkrts/ 2015-11-09 Igor Zamyatin PR target/66326

[Bug tree-optimization/65447] AArch64: iv-opt causes bad addressing

2015-11-09 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65447 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug middle-end/68253] [6 Regression] conditional jump or move depends on uninitialized value in fold-const.c:5587

2015-11-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68253 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Mon Nov 9 10:45:00 2015 New Revision: 230011 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230011&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/68253 * fold-const.c (fold_truth_andor_1

[Bug middle-end/68253] [6 Regression] conditional jump or move depends on uninitialized value in fold-const.c:5587

2015-11-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68253 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/67141] wrong libgomp mutex initialisation order

2015-11-09 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67141 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/49526] extra move instruction for smmul

2015-11-09 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49526 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/68254] New: [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:954 with -O -fPIC and "X" asm input @ aarch64

2015-11-09 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68254 Bug ID: 68254 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:954 with -O -fPIC and "X" asm input @ aarch64 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCO

[Bug rtl-optimization/67749] FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-2.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made"

2015-11-09 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67749 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Mon Nov 9 11:40:17 2015 New Revision: 230014 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230014&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [RTL-ifcvt] PR rtl-optimization/67749: Do not emit separat

[Bug debug/66716] gomp4: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/kernels-loop.c -g ICE

2015-11-09 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66716 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug target/68254] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:954 with -O -fPIC and "X" asm input @ aarch64

2015-11-09 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68254 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/67749] FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-2.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made"

2015-11-09 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67749 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug target/68254] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:954 with -O -fPIC and "X" asm input @ aarch64

2015-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68254 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/63669] [AArch64] gcc.dg/torture/asm-subreg-1.c ICEs with -fPIC or -mno-lra

2015-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63669 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz --- Comment #5 f

[Bug rtl-optimization/68250] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)

2015-11-09 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68250 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/68250] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)

2015-11-09 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68250 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- And that's PR66949, but that's an ICE, not wrong-code.

[Bug tree-optimization/68249] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2015-11-09 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68249 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/68251] [6 Regression] sorry, unimplemented: reverse storage order for BLKmode

2015-11-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68251 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|wrong-code |rejects-valid URL|

[Bug middle-end/68251] [6 Regression] sorry, unimplemented: reverse storage order for BLKmode

2015-11-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68251 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Mon Nov 9 12:14:07 2015 New Revision: 230015 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230015&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/68251 * tree-core.h (REF_REVERSE_STORAGE

[Bug middle-end/68251] [6 Regression] sorry, unimplemented: reverse storage order for BLKmode

2015-11-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68251 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/68253] [6 Regression] conditional jump or move depends on uninitialized value in fold-const.c:5587

2015-11-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68253 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Mon Nov 9 12:31:50 2015 New Revision: 230017 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230017&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/68253 * fold-const.c (fold_truth_andor_1

[Bug middle-end/68251] [6 Regression] sorry, unimplemented: reverse storage order for BLKmode

2015-11-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68251 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Mon Nov 9 12:32:28 2015 New Revision: 230018 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230018&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/68251 * tree-core.h (REF_REVERSE_STORAGE

[Bug middle-end/68253] [6 Regression] conditional jump or move depends on uninitialized value in fold-const.c:5587

2015-11-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68253 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- The leak has gone, thanks.

[Bug tree-optimization/56118] Piecewise vector / complex initialization from constants not combined

2015-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56118 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Nov 9 12:59:17 2015 New Revision: 230020 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230020&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-11-09 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/56118

[Bug tree-optimization/68234] tree-vrp pass need to be improved when handling ASSERT_EXPR

2015-11-09 Thread jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68234 --- Comment #4 from Jiong Wang --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3) > On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68234 > > > > Jiong Wang changed: > > > >

[Bug go/68255] New: cgo-generated constructor not being called

2015-11-09 Thread vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68255 Bug ID: 68255 Summary: cgo-generated constructor not being called Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug tree-optimization/56118] Piecewise vector / complex initialization from constants not combined

2015-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56118 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Cost model still rejects the original testcase.

[Bug target/68256] New: [6 regression] switching constant pools to rodata sections causes go bootstrap failure.

2015-11-09 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68256 Bug ID: 68256 Summary: [6 regression] switching constant pools to rodata sections causes go bootstrap failure. Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug target/68256] [6 regression] switching constant pools to rodata sections causes go bootstrap failure.

2015-11-09 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68256 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/67811] [TM] ICE with try-block in transaction

2015-11-09 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67811 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/68068] [6 Regression] ICE: in get_untransformed_body, at cgraph.c:3268

2015-11-09 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68068 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/67295] [ARM][6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/arm/builtin-bswap-1.c scan-assembler-times revshne\\t 1

2015-11-09 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67295 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Sorry for getting back late on this. I'll try to give more detailed steps to reproduce this. I take my clean checkout of trunk from svn and do: 1) $ svn up -r226900 This is the revision before

[Bug target/68256] [6 regression] switching constant pools to rodata sections causes go bootstrap failure.

2015-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68256 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/68248] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in uniform_vector_p, at tree.c:10807

2015-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68248 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Nov 9 14:47:09 2015 New Revision: 230021 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230021&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-11-09 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/68248

[Bug ipa/67811] [TM] ICE with try-block in transaction

2015-11-09 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67811 --- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson --- copy_bbs fails to duplicate the eh regions included within the requested region. This no doubt causes all sorts of bad follow-on effects, heretofore unobserved.

[Bug debug/67192] [6 Regression] Backward-goto in loop can get wrong line number

2015-11-09 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192 --- Comment #23 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Mon Nov 9 15:31:32 2015 New Revision: 230023 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230023&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR debug/67192] Fix C loops' back-jump location gcc/c/ChangeLog:

[Bug debug/67192] [6 Regression] Backward-goto in loop can get wrong line number

2015-11-09 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192 --- Comment #24 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Mon Nov 9 15:35:10 2015 New Revision: 230024 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230024&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR debug/67192] Further fix C loops' back-jump location gcc/c/Chang

[Bug target/68129] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in simplify_const_binary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:3961 (TARGET_SUPPORTS_WIDE_INT == 0) with -fno-split-wide-types @ aarch64

2015-11-09 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68129 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Mon Nov 9 15:53:26 2015 New Revision: 230029 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230029&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [AArch64] PR target/68129: Define TARGET_SUPPORTS_WIDE_INT

[Bug c/68107] Non-VLA type whose size is half or more of the address space constructed via a pointer

2015-11-09 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68107 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c/68107] Non-VLA type whose size is half or more of the address space constructed via a pointer

2015-11-09 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68107 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- The same seems to apply for the C++ FE as well.

[Bug c++/68257] New: Reject empty abi_tag attribute on inline namespace

2015-11-09 Thread sbergman at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68257 Bug ID: 68257 Summary: Reject empty abi_tag attribute on inline namespace Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c++/68258] New: core 879 Missing built-in comparison operators for pointer types not supported

2015-11-09 Thread derrick at ca dot ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68258 Bug ID: 68258 Summary: core 879 Missing built-in comparison operators for pointer types not supported Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug sanitizer/68259] New: [6 Regression][UBSAN] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type or array_type, have reference_type in reverse_storage_order_for_component_p, at t

2015-11-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68259 Bug ID: 68259 Summary: [6 Regression][UBSAN] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type or array_type, have reference_type in reverse_sto

[Bug debug/66728] [5 Regression] CONST_WIDE_INT causes corrupted DWARF debug info

2015-11-09 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66728 --- Comment #11 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Mon Nov 9 18:27:43 2015 New Revision: 230039 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230039&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/66728 * dwarf2out.c (get_full_len): Retur

[Bug debug/66728] [5 Regression] CONST_WIDE_INT causes corrupted DWARF debug info

2015-11-09 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66728 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/57854] Would like to have a warning for virtual overrides without C++11 "override" keyword

2015-11-09 Thread nachms+gcc at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57854 Nach changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nachms+gcc at gmail dot com --- Comment #6 from N

[Bug fortran/68225] ICE with -Wrealloc-lhs-all on structure constructor with allocatable components

2015-11-09 Thread gerhard.steinmetz.fort...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68225 --- Comment #4 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- > > Am I correct to understand that this error is bogus for Fortran 2008 (at > least)? That feature is new in F2008 : A structure constructor can omit the value for an allocatable component. Further

[Bug fortran/68225] ICE with -Wrealloc-lhs-all on structure constructor with allocatable scalar component(s)

2015-11-09 Thread gerhard.steinmetz.fort...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68225 --- Comment #5 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- $ cat yy0.f90 program p type t integer, allocatable :: a(:) end type type(t) :: x x = t() print *, allocated(x%a), x%a end $ gfortran -g -O0 -Wall -fcheck=all yy0.f90 $ a.out F -

[Bug fortran/66494] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on using same name for embedded subroutine

2015-11-09 Thread gerhard.steinmetz.fort...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66494 --- Comment #4 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Indeed it is. And prefix specs recursive and non_recursive are not relevant here.

[Bug sanitizer/68260] New: false positive with tsan

2015-11-09 Thread claprix at yandex dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68260 Bug ID: 68260 Summary: false positive with tsan Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer Assi

[Bug sanitizer/68260] false positive with tsan

2015-11-09 Thread dvyukov at google dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68260 Dmitry Vyukov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dvyukov at google dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug sanitizer/68259] [6 Regression][UBSAN] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type or array_type, have reference_type in reverse_storage_order_for_component_p, at tree.h

2015-11-09 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68259 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/44348] ICE in build_function_decl

2015-11-09 Thread gerhard.steinmetz.fort...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44348 --- Comment #11 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- As a side note, with a slightly modified example b from comment 3 and $ gfortran --version GNU Fortran (SUSE Linux) 5.2.1 20151008 [gcc-5-branch revision 228597] $ cat pr44348_c3b_modified.f90 FUNCTI

[Bug sanitizer/68259] [6 Regression][UBSAN] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type or array_type, have reference_type in reverse_storage_order_for_component_p, at tree.h

2015-11-09 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68259 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Started with r229965 aka Merge of the scalar-storage-order branch.

[Bug sanitizer/68259] [6 Regression][sso] tree checking failure in reverse_storage_order_for_component_p, at tree.h:4392

2015-11-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68259 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug middle-end/68259] [6 Regression][sso] tree checking failure in reverse_storage_order_for_component_p, at tree.h:4392

2015-11-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68259 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Component|sanitizer |middle-end --- Comment #4 from Eric Botc

[Bug target/68261] New: GCC needs to use optimized version of memcpy

2015-11-09 Thread geir at cray dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68261 Bug ID: 68261 Summary: GCC needs to use optimized version of memcpy Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: targ

[Bug c++/68262] New: Ill-formed function pointer declaration acts as multi-line comment until ;

2015-11-09 Thread yaghmour.shafik at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68262 Bug ID: 68262 Summary: Ill-formed function pointer declaration acts as multi-line comment until ; Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/68263] New: Vector "*mov_internal" fails to handle misaligned load/store from reload

2015-11-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68263 Bug ID: 68263 Summary: Vector "*mov_internal" fails to handle misaligned load/store from reload Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/68259] [6 Regression][sso] tree checking failure in reverse_storage_order_for_component_p, at tree.h:4392

2015-11-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68259 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Mon Nov 9 22:40:44 2015 New Revision: 230056 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230056&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/68259 * tree.h (reverse_storage_order_fo

[Bug middle-end/68259] [6 Regression][sso] tree checking failure in reverse_storage_order_for_component_p, at tree.h:4392

2015-11-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68259 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Mon Nov 9 22:42:14 2015 New Revision: 230057 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230057&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/68259 * tree.h (reverse_storage_order_fo

[Bug middle-end/68259] [6 Regression][sso] tree checking failure in reverse_storage_order_for_component_p, at tree.h:4392

2015-11-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68259 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68264] New: tree-call-cdce wrongly uses ordered comparisons

2015-11-09 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68264 Bug ID: 68264 Summary: tree-call-cdce wrongly uses ordered comparisons Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tre

[Bug target/57845] ICE with -freg-struct-return on SPARC

2015-11-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57845 --- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Tue Nov 10 00:45:03 2015 New Revision: 230074 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230074&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/57845 * config/sparc/sparc.c (sparc_functio

[Bug target/57845] ICE with -freg-struct-return on SPARC

2015-11-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57845 --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Tue Nov 10 00:47:28 2015 New Revision: 230076 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230076&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/57845 * config/sparc/sparc.c (sparc_functio

[Bug target/57845] ICE with -freg-struct-return on SPARC

2015-11-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57845 --- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Tue Nov 10 00:49:05 2015 New Revision: 230077 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230077&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/57845 * config/sparc/sparc.c (sparc_functio

[Bug target/57845] ICE with -freg-struct-return on SPARC

2015-11-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57845 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Version|4.9.0

[Bug target/68261] GCC needs to use optimized version of memcpy

2015-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68261 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Note glibc does provide a memcpy which is optimized for each target via ifuncs. What version of glibc are you running.

[Bug c++/68265] New: Arbitrary syntactic nonsense silently accepted after 'int (*){}' until the next close brace

2015-11-09 Thread zackw at panix dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68265 Bug ID: 68265 Summary: Arbitrary syntactic nonsense silently accepted after 'int (*){}' until the next close brace Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/67927] array new expression with excessive number of elements not diagnosed

2015-11-09 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67927 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Nov 10 02:23:34 2015 New Revision: 230081 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230081&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/67913 - new expression with negative size not diagnosed PR c++/6792

[Bug c++/67913] new expression with negative size not diagnosed

2015-11-09 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67913 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Nov 10 02:23:34 2015 New Revision: 230081 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230081&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/67913 - new expression with negative size not diagnosed PR c++/6792

[Bug c++/67913] new expression with negative size not diagnosed

2015-11-09 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67913 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67927] array new expression with excessive number of elements not diagnosed

2015-11-09 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67927 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/68231] [6 Regression] bootstrap failure after placement new

2015-11-09 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68231 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68266] New: pointers to arrays of excessive size not diagnosed

2015-11-09 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68266 Bug ID: 68266 Summary: pointers to arrays of excessive size not diagnosed Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug middle-end/68251] [6 Regression] sorry, unimplemented: reverse storage order for BLKmode

2015-11-09 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68251 --- Comment #8 from Joost VandeVondele --- Created attachment 36671 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36671&action=edit reduced testcase thanks, the issue is fixed indeed. Attached is the reduced testcase, about 1000 lines re

  1   2   >