--enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160117 (experimental) [trunk revision 232481] (GCC)
$:
$: gcc-trunk small.c -O1 ; ./a.out
1
$: gcc-trunk small.c -O2 ; ./a.out
1
$: gcc-trunk small.c -O3 ; ./a.out
1
$: gcc-trunk small.c -O1 -m32 ; ./a.out
1
$: gcc-trunk small.c -O2 -m32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69341
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||68692
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69341
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69341
Bug ID: 69341
Summary: [6 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_ssa failed
(error: definition in block 37 does not dominate use
in block 30)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69340
Bug ID: 69340
Summary: Incorrect use of standard try catch in
libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cow-stdexcept.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68799
--- Comment #16 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Mon Jan 18 03:54:48 2016
New Revision: 232494
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232494&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-17 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline:
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68799
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
-I/var/tmp/gcc-6.0.0_alpha20160117/work/gcc-6-20160117/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++
-I/var/tmp/gcc-6.0.0_alpha20160117/work/gcc-6-20160117/libstdc++-v3/include/backward
-I/var/tmp/gcc-6.0.0_alpha20160117/work/gcc-6-20160117/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util
-L/var/tmp/gcc-6.0.0_alpha20160117/work/build/powe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68799
--- Comment #15 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Mon Jan 18 02:46:58 2016
New Revision: 232492
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232492&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-17 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline:
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68799
--- Comment #14 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Mon Jan 18 02:43:06 2016
New Revision: 232491
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232491&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-17 Bill Schmidt
PR tree-optimization/68799
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69338
Bug ID: 69338
Summary: incorrect ctor initialization of a flexible array
member
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69337
Bug ID: 69337
Summary: Internal compiler error fortran c lto
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69336
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69336
Bug ID: 69336
Summary: Constant value not detected
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69295
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69332
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69333
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69331
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69317
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69318
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69310
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Component|bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69311
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69307
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69296
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69297
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69322
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69295
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69335
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
le-bootstrap --enable-checking=yes,rtl
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,go,java,objc,obj-c++,ada
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160117 (experimental) (GCC)
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
--- Comment #15 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #2)
> the regression and I'm pretty sure would not introduce other wrt the status
> pre-r226234, but I don't fully understand why that is necessary, there are
W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69334
Bug ID: 69334
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/guality/pr55665.C -O2 line 23 p == 40
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
--- Comment #14 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Related bug 52116
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69326
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Started with r232361.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69325
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69329
--- Comment #1 from Mikhail Maltsev ---
I tried this patch:
diff --git a/Makefile.in b/Makefile.in
index 2733c4d..31ee4c0 100644
--- a/Makefile.in
+++ b/Makefile.in
@@ -789,7 +789,8 @@ BASE_FLAGS_TO_PASS = \
$(CXX_FOR_TARGET_FLAG_TO_PASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53901
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69333
Bug ID: 69333
Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: StackTrace2 execution - source
compiled test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69326
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69332
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|FAIL: |[6 Regression] FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69328
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69332
Bug ID: 69332
Summary: FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print
abspawn -ignore SIGHUP
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/xg++ -shared-libgcc
-B/home /dave/gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69331
Bug ID: 69331
Summary: [6 regression] FAIL:
20_util/shared_ptr/thread/default_weaktoshared.cc
execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68734
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53901
W E Brown changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||webrown.cpp at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68734
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Jan 17 18:16:42 2016
New Revision: 232486
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232486&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/68734
* config/abi/post/hppa-linux-gnu/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61831
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61831
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/ 5 Regression] runtime |[4.9 Regression] runtime
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66082
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jan 17 17:34:12 2016
New Revision: 232482
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232482&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-17 Mikael Morin
Backport from trunk.
PR fortran/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61831
--- Comment #60 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jan 17 17:34:12 2016
New Revision: 232482
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232482&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-17 Mikael Morin
Backport from trunk.
PR fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69312
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69330
Bug ID: 69330
Summary: avr-gcc Error: operand out of range: 32
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
--- Comment #12 from David Malcolm ---
Patch posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg01212.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69003
--- Comment #6 from Franz Sirl ---
Yes, this fixes the testcase and also the real application it was derived from
here. No testsuite regressions on x86_64 either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69329
Bug ID: 69329
Summary: [6 Regression] --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan
fails because LSAN_OPTIONS is not honored
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69328
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69328
Bug ID: 69328
Summary: ice in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at
tree-vect-stmts.c:1379 with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69204
--- Comment #11 from Dmitry Vyukov ---
> No it just exposes the problem of using futex system calls with TSAN.
What is that problem?
Future does not use futex for synchronization, only for wait optimization. So I
don't see how it can cause false
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69327
Bug ID: 69327
Summary: constexpr leaves reference member var uninitialized
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038
--- Comment #36 from Joshua Kinard ---
(In reply to Joshua Kinard from comment #35)
>
> It looks like it's my LDFLAGS, specifically with -Wl,-z,now.
It looks like this might be a problem with my toolchain, possibly in binutils,
and possibly onl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69205
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the trunk has a different error message:
t.cc: In function ‘int main(int, char**)’:
t.cc:12:30: error: no matching function for call to
‘print_action(function&)’
print_action(t);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69205
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69326
Bug ID: 69326
Summary: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69205
--- Comment #1 from mohsen ---
I reported this bug one week ago but I did not get any feedback about this. I
am not familiar about procedures of answering a bug. Please take me any
suggestion about this bug or at least the minimum time that may t
66 matches
Mail list logo
