[Bug target/69274] [6 Regression] 435.gromacs performance regression after r231814 on x86 Haswell and bdver2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69274 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/69274] [6 Regression] 435.gromacs performance regression after r231814 on x86 Haswell and bdver2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69274 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug target/69344] [6 Regression] 435.gromacs regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69344 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69345] [6 Regression] 459.GemsFDTD regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69345 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/69345] New: [6 Regression] 459.GemsFDTD regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69345 Bug ID: 69345 Summary: [6 Regression] 459.GemsFDTD regression Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Prior

[Bug target/69305] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128 @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69305 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #5) > Confirmed as well. > If combine changed the plus-compare into a minus-compare, shouldn't it also > go into the condition code usage and update that too th

[Bug target/69344] [6 Regression] 435.gromacs regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69344 Igor Zamyatin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug target/69305] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128 @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69305 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Confirmed as well. If combine changed the plus-compare into a minus-compare, shouldn't it also go into the condition code usage and update that too though?

[Bug target/69305] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128 @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69305 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69344] New: [6 Regression] 435.gromacs regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69344 Bug ID: 69344 Summary: [6 Regression] 435.gromacs regression Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priori

[Bug target/69344] [6 Regression] 435.gromacs regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69344 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/68620] ICE on gcc.target/arm/attr-neon-fp16.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68620 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2015-12-03

[Bug tree-optimization/69308] ifcombine joins together floating point expression with side effects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69308 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/69308] ifcombine joins together floating point expression with side effects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69308 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jan 18 13:03:54 2016 New Revision: 232516 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232516&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-01-18 Richard Biener PR middle-end/69308 * gi

[Bug target/69305] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128 @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69305 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Looks like aarch64 backend bug to me. unsigned __int128 f1 (unsigned __int128 x, unsigned __int128 y) { return x + y; } unsigned __int128 f2 (unsigned __int128 x, unsigned __int128 y) { return x - y; } unsign

[Bug tree-optimization/69336] Constant value not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69336 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/69336] Constant value not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69336 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Not fixed with r232508. Fixed with the suggested Index: gcc/tree-ssa-scopedtables.c === --- gcc/tree-ssa-scopedtables.c (revision 232508) +++

[Bug target/63679] [5/6 Regression][AArch64] Failure to constant fold.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679 --- Comment #40 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: alalaw01 Date: Mon Jan 18 12:40:43 2016 New Revision: 232508 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232508&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Equate MEM_REFs and ARRAY_REFs in tree-ssa-scopedtables.c

[Bug libstdc++/69243] std::function summons a non-null pointer out of thin air

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69243 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/69293] scoped_allocator_adaptor::construct calls wrong function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69293 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6) > Author: redi > Date: Mon Jan 18 11:43:37 2016 > New Revision: 232504 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232504&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > Fix construct

[Bug target/63679] [5/6 Regression][AArch64] Failure to constant fold.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679 --- Comment #39 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: alalaw01 Date: Mon Jan 18 12:29:02 2016 New Revision: 232506 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232506&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Make SRA scalarize constant-pool loads PR target/63679

[Bug tree-optimization/69328] [6 Regression] ice in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1379 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69328 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

[Bug rtl-optimization/69307] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fselective-scheduling @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69307 Zdenek Sojka changed: What|Removed |Added Target|armv7a-*-linux-gnueabi-gcc |armv7a-*-linux-gnueabi --- Comment #5 fro

[Bug lto/69337] [6 Regression] Internal compiler error fortran c lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69337 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jan 18 12:19:31 2016 New Revision: 232505 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232505&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-01-18 Richard Biener PR lto/69337 * lto-symtab

[Bug lto/69337] [6 Regression] Internal compiler error fortran c lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69337 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69252] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-9.c FAILs with -Os -fmodulo-sched -fmodulo-sched-allow-regmoves -fsched-pressure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69252 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Thus, Roman, can you please post your patch to gcc-patches? Thanks.

[Bug libstdc++/69295] [6 Regression] New special math function failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69295 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug tree-optimization/69341] [6 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 37 does not dominate use in block 30)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69341 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug target/69343] [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on s390{,x}-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69343 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- libitm configury really should check if compiling something with -march=z13 on s390{,x}-* succeeds. The question is what to do if it fails, whether we create an ABI incompatible version of libitm in that cas

[Bug libstdc++/69293] scoped_allocator_adaptor::construct calls wrong function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69293 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon Jan 18 11:43:37 2016 New Revision: 232504 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232504&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix construction of std::function from null pointer-to-member PR

[Bug bootstrap/69343] New: [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on s390{,x}-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69343 Bug ID: 69343 Summary: [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on s390{,x}-linux Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug bootstrap/69343] [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on s390{,x}-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69343 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/68955] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86-64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68955 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37362|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libstdc++/69340] [6 Regression] Incorrect use of standard try catch in libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cow-stdexcept.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69340 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon Jan 18 11:24:20 2016 New Revision: 232502 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232502&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix libstdc++ build with -fno-exceptions PR libstdc++/69340

[Bug libstdc++/69340] [6 Regression] Incorrect use of standard try catch in libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cow-stdexcept.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69340 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/68824] [6 Regression] libtsan is missing the __interceptor___tls_get_addr symbol without bumping the soname

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68824 --- Comment #7 from Dmitry Vyukov --- I will land such fix in clang. Thanks!

[Bug libstdc++/69340] [6 Regression] Incorrect use of standard try catch in libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cow-stdexcept.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69340 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libstdc++/69259] std::experimental::filesystem::copy does not create symlinks for directories

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69259 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- The TS says "Otherwise no effects" which seems pretty clear it's not meant to treat it as an error, but I'll raise it with the committee.

[Bug rtl-optimization/69307] [6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fselective-scheduling @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69307 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |rtl-optimization Known

[Bug libstdc++/69295] [6 Regression] New special math function failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69295 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- It's arguable whether this should be marked as a regression, as it's new code and new tests, so the tests wouldn't even compile before gcc6.

[Bug sanitizer/68824] [6 Regression] libtsan is missing the __interceptor___tls_get_addr symbol without bumping the soname

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68824 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Dmitry Vyukov from comment #5) > In 3) did you mean -mstackrealign? No, I meant -mincoming-stack-boundary=3, -mstackrealign doesn't do anything in this case. > 1) looks like the simplest option

[Bug target/69307] [6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fselective-scheduling @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69307 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Although, the trigger is the scheduling model used For example, -mtune=arm1136j-s shows the wrong code with any -march option

[Bug sanitizer/68824] [6 Regression] libtsan is missing the __interceptor___tls_get_addr symbol without bumping the soname

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68824 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry Vyukov --- In 3) did you mean -mstackrealign? 1) looks like the simplest option. Are there any downsides?

[Bug tree-optimization/69341] [6 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 37 does not dominate use in block 30)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69341 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/69297] [6 Regression] Performance regression after r230020

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69297 --- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- Yes, this loop was added for avoiding dce phase. Thanks. Yuri. 2016-01-18 13:33 GMT+03:00 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org : > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69297 > > --- Comment #3 from Richard

[Bug libstdc++/69340] [6 Regression] Incorrect use of standard try catch in libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cow-stdexcept.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69340 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/69339] [6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe target: libitm/vect128.cc:1:0: error: AltiVec and SPE instructions cannot coexist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69339 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug sanitizer/68824] [6 Regression] libtsan is missing the __interceptor___tls_get_addr symbol without bumping the soname

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68824 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69307] [6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fselective-scheduling @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69307 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/69337] [6 Regression] Internal compiler error fortran c lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69337 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug tree-optimization/69336] Constant value not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69336 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alan.lawrence at arm dot com --- Commen

[Bug bootstrap/69329] [6 Regression] --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan fails because LSAN_OPTIONS is not honored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69329 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/69297] [6 Regression] Performance regression after r230020

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69297 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- With a fix: t.c:76:10: note: Cost model analysis: Vector inside of basic block cost: 376 Vector prologue cost: 0 Vector epilogue cost: 0 Scalar cost of basic block: 96 t.c:76:10: note: not vectorize

[Bug ada/69219] [5/6 regression] error on nested subprograms with Inline_Always and Intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69219 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Mon Jan 18 10:29:45 2016 New Revision: 232499 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232499&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ada/69219 * gcc-interface/trans.c (check_inlining_

[Bug ada/69219] [5/6 regression] error on nested subprograms with Inline_Always and Intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69219 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/69219] [5/6 regression] error on nested subprograms with Inline_Always and Intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69219 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Mon Jan 18 10:27:10 2016 New Revision: 232498 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232498&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ada/69219 * gcc-interface/trans.c (check_inlining_f

[Bug libstdc++/69259] std::experimental::filesystem::copy does not create symlinks for directories

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69259 --- Comment #4 from Roman Puls --- Hi Jonathan, well, I agree that the standard does not cover thar particular combination of input parameters. But: is falling through the function without the error_code set what we expect? I was assuming that

[Bug target/69311] [5 Regression] ICE (cc1 killed) on s390x-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69311 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|6.0 |5.3.1 Target Milestone|6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/69308] ifcombine joins together floating point expression with side effects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69308 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|NEW

[Bug target/69305] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128 @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69305 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.0 |5.4

[Bug c++/69300] g++ segfault on silly noexcept case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69300 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69297] [6 Regression] Performance regression after r230020

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69297 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/66797] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr65447.c scan-tree-dump-not ivopts "\\nuse 5\\n"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66797 --- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Mon Jan 18 09:30:10 2016 New Revision: 232497 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232497&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/66797 * gcc.c-torture/exec

[Bug tree-optimization/69170] [6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in find_uses_to_rename_use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69170 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69170] [6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in find_uses_to_rename_use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69170 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jan 18 09:14:14 2016 New Revision: 232496 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232496&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-01-18 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/69170

[Bug middle-end/52173] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed possibly caused by itm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69323] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Segmentation fault when instantiating class template with inner class which declares itself as a friend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69323 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/69320] [6 Regression] wrong code generation at -O2 and higher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320 --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- *** Bug 69322 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/69322] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86-64-linux-gnu (in 32- and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69322 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/69307] [6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fselective-scheduling @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69307 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/69320] [6 Regression] wrong code generation at -O2 and higher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- *** Bug 69342 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/69320] [6 Regression] wrong code generation at -O2 and higher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/69342] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2, -O3 (NOT -Os) on x86-64-linux-gnu (in 32- and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69342 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69326] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69326 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69320] [6 Regression] wrong code generation at -O2 and higher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chengniansun at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug tree-optimization/69325] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86-64-linux-gnu (in 32- and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69325 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcj/69333] [6 Regression] FAIL: StackTrace2 execution - source compiled test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69333 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/69342] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2, -O3 (NOT -Os) on x86-64-linux-gnu (in 32- and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69342 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug tree-optimization/69342] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2, -O3 (NOT -Os) on x86-64-linux-gnu (in 32- and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69342 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

<    1   2