[Bug libgcc/66382] POWER8 Vector optimized implementation of __float128 (IEEE754 128-bit Binary Floating Point)

2016-03-26 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66382 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/70052] [5/6 Regression] ICE compiling _Decimal128 test case

2016-03-26 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70052 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|5.3.1 |4.9.4 Summary|ICE compiling

[Bug c++/70018] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Possible issue around IPO and C++ comdats discovered as pure/const

2016-03-26 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70018 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/70420] New: (Building GCC) mtune=native and internal compiler error at emit-rtl.c:1027

2016-03-26 Thread xsetech at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70420 Bug ID: 70420 Summary: (Building GCC) mtune=native and internal compiler error at emit-rtl.c:1027 Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/70416] [SH]: error: 'asm' operand requires impossible reload when building ruby2.3

2016-03-26 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/70419] New: descriptions of -fpic/-fPIC and -fpic/-fPIE aren't clear and contain syntax error

2016-03-26 Thread britton.kerin at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70419 Bug ID: 70419 Summary: descriptions of -fpic/-fPIC and -fpic/-fPIE aren't clear and contain syntax error Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/70417] New g++6 rejects previously valid code

2016-03-26 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70417 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/70418] VM structure type specifier in list of parameter declarations within nested function definition ices.

2016-03-26 Thread sasho648 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70418 --- Comment #4 from sasho648 at gmail dot com --- The full ice message is: test_bug_0.c: In function ‘main’: test_bug_0.c:24:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 0xb482ef crash_signal ../../gcc/gcc/toplev.c:335 0xbda96a

[Bug c/70418] VM structure type specifier in list of parameter declarations within nested function definition ices.

2016-03-26 Thread sasho648 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70418 --- Comment #3 from sasho648 at gmail dot com --- currently *is* working fine and as expected when the function is not nested

[Bug c/70418] VM structure type specifier in list of parameter declarations within nested function definition ices.

2016-03-26 Thread sasho648 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70418 --- Comment #2 from sasho648 at gmail dot com --- Must be noted that such code must be valid and actually currently working fine and as expected when the function is not nested. Eg.: #include extern void fp(int a, const struct {int _[a];} *b)

[Bug c/70418] VM structure type specifier in list of parameter declarations within nested function definition ices.

2016-03-26 Thread sasho648 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70418 sasho648 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|VM structure type specifier |VM structure type specifier

[Bug c/70418] New: VM structure type specifier in list of parameter declarations function definition

2016-03-26 Thread sasho648 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70418 Bug ID: 70418 Summary: VM structure type specifier in list of parameter declarations function definition Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/70275] -w disables all -Werror flags

2016-03-26 Thread kevin-tucker at cox dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70275 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Tucker --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #2) > I'm not sure if this is desired, but changing it is not a huge amount of > work: One just needs to move the check for > > /* Give preference to being

[Bug target/70416] [SH]: error: 'asm' operand requires impossible reload when building ruby2.3

2016-03-26 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416 --- Comment #10 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- Created attachment 38104 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38104=edit Preprocessed source for sprintf.c when building with -mlra

[Bug target/70416] [SH]: error: 'asm' operand requires impossible reload when building ruby2.3

2016-03-26 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
stored into /tmp/ccbUbdGW.out file, please attach this to your bugreport. Full build log in [1]. Preprocessed source ccbUbdGW.out is following shortly. Adrian > [1] > https://people.debian.org/~glaubitz/ruby2.3_2.3.0-5_sh4-20160326-1814.build

[Bug c++/70417] New: New g++6 rejects previously valid code

2016-03-26 Thread jengelh at inai dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70417 Bug ID: 70417 Summary: New g++6 rejects previously valid code Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/70416] [SH]: error: 'asm' operand requires impossible reload when building ruby2.3

2016-03-26 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416 --- Comment #8 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- Ok, I have added -save-temps to the command line which created both assembly output as well as the preprocessed output. Adrian

[Bug target/70416] [SH]: error: 'asm' operand requires impossible reload when building ruby2.3

2016-03-26 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416 --- Comment #7 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- Created attachment 38103 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38103=edit Assembly output for vm.c

[Bug target/70416] [SH]: error: 'asm' operand requires impossible reload when building ruby2.3

2016-03-26 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416 --- Comment #6 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- Created attachment 38102 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38102=edit Preprocessed source for vm.c

[Bug target/70416] [SH]: error: 'asm' operand requires impossible reload when building ruby2.3

2016-03-26 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416 --- Comment #5 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #3) > (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #1) > > You could try to compile the package with -mlra and see if it helps. > > I'm giving that a

[Bug bootstrap/67728] Build fails when cross-compiling with in-tree GMP and ISL

2016-03-26 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67728 --- Comment #24 from Bernd Edlinger --- Created attachment 38101 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38101=edit possible patch Hi, this is a patch that fixes the check-mpc issue and fixes gmp-6.1.0 in-tree The reason for the

[Bug target/70416] [SH]: error: 'asm' operand requires impossible reload when building ruby2.3

2016-03-26 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416 --- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #3) > > > What constraints does DTRACE_PROBE4 macro have? > > I'm not sure however where DTRACE_PROBE4 is defined. Is that specific for > the build

[Bug target/70416] [SH]: error: 'asm' operand requires impossible reload when building ruby2.3

2016-03-26 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416 --- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #1) > You could try to compile the package with -mlra and see if it helps. I'm giving that a try now and will report back shortly. (In reply to Rich Felker

[Bug target/70416] [SH]: error: 'asm' operand requires impossible reload when building ruby2.3

2016-03-26 Thread bugdal at aerifal dot cx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416 --- Comment #2 from Rich Felker --- Since it's non-obvious where the relevant macros are defined, where that __asm__ statement comes from, and what its operands are, it would be really helpful if you or someone from the Ruby side could point it

[Bug target/70416] [SH]: error: 'asm' operand requires impossible reload when building ruby2.3

2016-03-26 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416 --- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo --- You could try to compile the package with -mlra and see if it helps.

[Bug target/70416] New: [SH]: error: 'asm' operand requires impossible reload when building ruby2.3

2016-03-26 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416 Bug ID: 70416 Summary: [SH]: error: 'asm' operand requires impossible reload when building ruby2.3 Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 URL:

[Bug c/70412] -Wswitch and functions that can only return a small set of values

2016-03-26 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70412 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/70275] -w disables all -Werror flags

2016-03-26 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70275 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug ipa/70366] [6 Regression] chromium fails to build with LTO due to segfault in ipa-inline-transform.c:inline_call

2016-03-26 Thread prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70366 --- Comment #6 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: prathamesh3492 Date: Sat Mar 26 10:08:47 2016 New Revision: 234490 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234490=gcc=rev Log: 2016-03-26 Richard Biener

[Bug testsuite/70356] gcc.target/i386/avx-vextractf128-256-5.c FAILs

2016-03-26 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70356 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/70235] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Incorrect output with PF format

2016-03-26 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70235 --- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Nice work! Unfortunately not finished yet!-( program fmt implicit none real*4 y character(45) :: fmtstr integer :: p,w,d y = 643.125 d=2 w=18 do p=-8,7

[Bug target/70359] [6 Regression] Code size increase for ARM compared to gcc-5.3.0

2016-03-26 Thread kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359 --- Comment #10 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- I am looking into it. -mcpu=arm966e-s does not uses the TARGET_NEW_GENERIC_COSTS. i.e, the rtx costs setup by the back-end might not be optimal.

[Bug fortran/69043] Trying to include a directory causes an infinite loop

2016-03-26 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69043 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---