https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65471
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65471
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Jun 9 10:16:19 2016
New Revision: 237252
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237252=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c/65471
* gcc.dg/c11-generic-3.c: New test.
Added:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71470
Bug ID: 71470
Summary: Wrong code on trunk gcc with westmere target
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71469
Bug ID: 71469
Summary: Print possible override candidates when a method is
marked override but doesn't override
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71455
--- Comment #4 from Avi Bloch ---
Unfortunately re-compiling gcc or moving to a different version is not an
option.
What I'm looking for are flags to pass to gcc that will alleviate the problem.
My problem seems similar to this one:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71386
--- Comment #1 from Anton Mitrokhin ---
Could anyone please take a look?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71455
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I think the patches for the performance issue were not too invasive so
backporting them should be possible. You can identify them by searching
bugzilla for "expand" slowness or by bisecting SVN revisions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71468
Bug ID: 71468
Summary: explicit ctor and overload resolution
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71445
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
True; on the other side, at least for backports we need some other solution,
because the symbol versioning stuff can't be backported to GCC 6.2 or 5.5 and
people will surely want to be able to compile those
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463
--- Comment #2 from Milian Wolff ---
Indeed, there is a difference between malloc in the two levels:
-O0:
extern void *malloc (size_t __size) throw () __attribute__ ((__malloc__)) ;
-O1:
extern void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71455
--- Comment #2 from Avi Bloch ---
Any ideas how I can workaround this problem?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71458
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
The PR is very similar to PR65044, I'm going to prepare a very similar patch
for -fsanitize=bounds.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71458
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Minimal test-case:
enum {} a[0];
void fn1(int);
void fn2() { fn1(a[-1]); }
Minimal command line arguments:
g++ pr.ii -fsanitize=bounds -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx
I've got a patch that fixes that, will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65832
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65832
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mirq-gccboogs at rere dot
qmqm.pl
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71467
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71458
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5)
> > Following patch fixes the failure:
> >
> > --cut here--
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71464
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71465
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71467
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
DUP of PR55266? (there are probably other related PRs)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71467
--- Comment #1 from Micha³ Miros³aw ---
It gets even worse with AVX also disabled.
$ gcc -O3 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -S -o - a.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71467
Bug ID: 71467
Summary: extra store for -mavx -mno-avx
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization, ssemmx
Severity: minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71462
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
#4 0x01035c30 in find_uses_to_rename (changed_bbs=0x26e1748,
use_blocks=0x281d750, need_phis=0x2792450, use_flags=1)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:476
476
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71455
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71466
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71310
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71310
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
--- Comment #5 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71407
Qirun Zhang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||helloqirun at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> It looks like RTL expansion uses DFmode to copy the aggregate which is likely
> because the backend (or stor-layout.c) assigns DFmode to struct s. A similar
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71465
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71464
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71462
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71461
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71456
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71462
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Summary|[7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70729
--- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016, ysrumyan at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70729
>
> --- Comment #23 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
> OK. I will try to prepare the second
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57745
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
101 - 141 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
