https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71588
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 21 06:59:33 2016
New Revision: 237628
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237628&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/71588
* tree-ssa-strlen.c (valid_buil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71528
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 21 07:02:59 2016
New Revision: 237629
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237629&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-06-14 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71604
Bug ID: 71604
Summary: ICE on valid C++11 code with range-based for loop: in
pop_binding, at cp/name-lookup.c:376
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71581
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 21 07:13:52 2016
New Revision: 237632
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237632&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-06-20 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71588
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 21 07:15:36 2016
New Revision: 237633
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237633&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/71588
* tree-ssa-strlen.c (valid_buil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71567
--- Comment #4 from Artem ---
Thank you very much.
This help
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71591
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71581
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71588
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE |[4.9/5 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71528
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] multiple |[5 Regression] multiple
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71604
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71605
Bug ID: 71605
Summary: ICE on invalid C++ code (incorrect member access): in
pop_binding, at cp/name-lookup.c:368
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64095
Patryk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||malekpatryk+gcc at gmail dot
com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71605
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71602
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 38737
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38737&action=edit
tentative patch with log entry and test-case
Currently testing on x86_64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71103
--- Comment #11 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jun 21 10:10:46 2016
New Revision: 237635
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237635&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/71103
* config/avr/avr.md (movqi): Only handle
: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160621 (experimental) [trunk revision 237628] (GCC)
$:
$: gcc-trunk -O2 small.c
unhandled expression in get_expr_operands():
unit size
align 64 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x7fe5fd7ae5e8
precision 64
pointer_to_this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71103
--- Comment #12 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jun 21 10:15:25 2016
New Revision: 237636
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237636&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/71103
* config/avr/avr.md (movqi): Only handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71606
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71103
--- Comment #13 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jun 21 10:18:26 2016
New Revision: 237637
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237637&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/71103
* config/avr/avr.md (movqi): Only handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71103
--- Comment #14 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jun 21 10:23:08 2016
New Revision: 237638
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237638&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/71103
* config/avr/avr.md (movqi): Only handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30417
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jun 21 10:36:13 2016
New Revision: 237639
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237639&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/30417
* config/avr/gen-avr-mmcu-specs.c (print_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30417
--- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jun 21 10:39:59 2016
New Revision: 237640
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237640&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from 2016-06-21 trunk r237639.
PR target/30417
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71607
Bug ID: 71607
Summary: [ARM] ice due to forbidden enabled attribute
dependency on instruction operands
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71607
--- Comment #1 from Mickael Guene ---
Created attachment 38739
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38739&action=edit
ice backtrace
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30417
--- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jun 21 10:43:12 2016
New Revision: 237641
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237641&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from 2016-06-21 trunk r237639.
PR target/30417
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71607
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30417
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jun 21 11:00:54 2016
New Revision: 237643
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237643&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from 2016-06-21 trunk r237639.
PR target/30417
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30417
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71144
Dominik Vogt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
--- Commen
: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160621 (experimental) (GCC)
Reproduces on gcc-4.3.6 or later with -O3.
Also reproduces on 5.1.0 or later with -O1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71549
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71549
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71068
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
cat pr71068.diff
Index: resolve.c
===
--- resolve.c (revision 236243)
+++ resolve.c (working copy)
@@ -14495,6 +14495,17 @@ check_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71608
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71068
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> cat pr71068.diff
> Index: resolve.c
> ===
...
Different patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-06/msg00067.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68463
jnorris at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71608
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm. Doesnt -2 * x overflow?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71608
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
negate_expr_p, for MULT_EXPR, has:
/* INT_MIN/n * n doesn't overflow while negating one operand it does
if n is a power of two. */
if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (t))
&& ! TYPE_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71608
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71609
Bug ID: 71609
Summary: [7 regression] test case gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90
fails starting with r237549
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71609
--- Comment #1 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Should be fixed by https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01501.html ?
Thanks,
bin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66867
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71103
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71068
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Jun 21 18:36:25 2016
New Revision: 237656
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237656&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-20 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/71068
* resolve.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71610
Bug ID: 71610
Summary: Improve location for "warning: ISO C restricts
enumerator values to range of ‘int’ [-Wpedantic]"?
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71611
Bug ID: 71611
Summary: UBSan shows type '' for enums based on long
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71612
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Something like the following is needed; the first part should be fine
(untested) and be sufficient for compiling the code, but the FIXME is required
to get it actually working ...
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71613
Bug ID: 71613
Summary: Useful warnings silenced when macros from system
headers are used
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71612
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71068
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71609
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71603
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, easyhack
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71597
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71567
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71610
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71613
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71613
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Really we need to review warnings and work out in each case what's right
for macros from system headers. If the issue is about the macro's
contents, the warnings should be avoided; if it r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70123
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Certainly OK by me to backport to gcc-5. So go for it Bernd when you're back
from PTO.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54412
Joseph Coffland changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at joe dot coffland.com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70864
Ian Harvey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian_harvey at bigpond dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71580
Ian Harvey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71614
Bug ID: 71614
Summary: ppc __gcc_qmul is mis-optimized not to be commutative
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71614
--- Comment #1 from Tim Shen ---
> Suppose the attached file is a.c
s/a\.c/b.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71614
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Two things, try -fno-strict-aliasing first.
Since your main violates C aliasing rules.
Second thing to try is -ffp-contract=off as I am suspecting:
v = a*d;
w = b*c;
tau += v + w; /* Add in other se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71614
--- Comment #3 from Tim Shen ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Two things, try -fno-strict-aliasing first.
> Since your main violates C aliasing rules.
> Second thing to try is -ffp-contract=off as I am suspecting:
> v = a*d;
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71614
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
The fix would then put a barrier to force GCC not to do contracting.
Something like:
v = a*d;
w = b*c;
asm("":"+f"(v));
asm("":"+f"(w));
tau += v + w; /* Add in other second-order terms. */
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71614
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
The other thing to note is:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00157.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71615
Bug ID: 71615
Summary: wrong float point result with {-Ofast, -march=native,
and valgrind}
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71615
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Component|f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71592
--- Comment #2 from 鍾 ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> You can't use such static_assert this way in C++, unless the function is
> constexpr, nor in C (always), so guess you are proposing something
> completely different (like, if
: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160621 (experimental) [trunk revision 237650] (GCC)
$
$ g++-trunk -O0 -c small.cpp
$ g++-6.1 -O1 -c small.cpp
$
$ g++-trunk -O1 -c small.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71592
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71592
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to 鍾 from comment #2)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> > You can't use such static_assert this way in C++, unless the function is
> > constexpr, nor in C (always), so guess you are pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71592
鍾 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from 鍾 ---
full_assertion_decl
75 matches
Mail list logo
