[Bug debug/49366] pointer-to-member-function not given value in DW_TAG_template_value_param

2016-08-12 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49366 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Aug 12 07:11:23 2016 New Revision: 239401 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239401&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR49366] emit loc exprs for C++ non-virtual pmf template value parms

[Bug debug/63240] DWARF does not represent C++ defaulted methods

2016-08-12 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63240 --- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Aug 12 07:11:50 2016 New Revision: 239403 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239403&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR63240] generate debug info for defaulted member functions This impl

[Bug debug/55641] debug info for the type of a reference declared with a typedef has spurious 'const'

2016-08-12 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55641 --- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Aug 12 07:11:36 2016 New Revision: 239402 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239402&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR55641] drop spurious const_type from reference_type variables Alth

[Bug debug/63240] DWARF does not represent C++ defaulted methods

2016-08-12 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63240 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/49366] pointer-to-member-function not given value in DW_TAG_template_value_param

2016-08-12 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49366 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/63243] [meta-bug] RH GDB project tracker

2016-08-12 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63243 Bug 63243 depends on bug 49366, which changed state. Bug 49366 Summary: pointer-to-member-function not given value in DW_TAG_template_value_param https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49366 What|Removed

[Bug debug/63243] [meta-bug] RH GDB project tracker

2016-08-12 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63243 Bug 63243 depends on bug 63240, which changed state. Bug 63240 Summary: DWARF does not represent C++ defaulted methods https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63240 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/73650] powerpc: -mcpu=e500mc hits ICE: insn does not satisfy its constraints

2016-08-12 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73650 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #39160|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug debug/55641] debug info for the type of a reference declared with a typedef has spurious 'const'

2016-08-12 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55641 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/63243] [meta-bug] RH GDB project tracker

2016-08-12 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63243 Bug 63243 depends on bug 55641, which changed state. Bug 55641 Summary: debug info for the type of a reference declared with a typedef has spurious 'const' https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55641 What|Removed

[Bug libitm/63907] libitm/config/posix/rwlock.cc doesn't compile

2016-08-12 Thread lts-rudolph at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63907 Klaus Rudolph changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.9.2, 6.1.0 --- Comment #3 from Klaus R

[Bug target/73650] powerpc: -mcpu=e500mc hits ICE: insn does not satisfy its constraints

2016-08-12 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73650 --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra --- It's a bit interesting that the problem insn (from ira dump): (insn 70 66 76 3 (parallel [ (set (reg:CC 198) (compare:CC (reg/v:SI 188 [ n ]) (const_int 0 [0])))

[Bug c/74751] New: gcc can't generate correct code

2016-08-12 Thread jeanerpp at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74751 Bug ID: 74751 Summary: gcc can't generate correct code Product: gcc Version: 4.8.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: c Assign

[Bug c/74751] gcc can't generate correct code

2016-08-12 Thread jeanerpp at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74751 --- Comment #1 from xujian --- I'd tried latest gcc 4.9.4, but fail to solve this issue. ngnsvr14 []/home/xujian/tools $ 4.9.4/bin/gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.9.4 Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the sour

[Bug target/72851] [6/7 Regression] memory hog with -O3 on s390x-linux-gnu

2016-08-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72851 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 12 07:34:40 2016 New Revision: 239405 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239405&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-08-12 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/72851

[Bug c/74751] gcc can't generate correct code

2016-08-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74751 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/74753] New: Windows 10 Helpline +1-855-639-4698

2016-08-12 Thread rk140280 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74753 Bug ID: 74753 Summary: Windows 10 Helpline +1-855-639-4698 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug c/74265] address sanitizer detects stack-buffer-overflow in set_nonincremental_init_from_string in c-typeck.c

2016-08-12 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74265 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug sanitizer/71042] libtsan requires __pointer_chk_guard@GLIBC_PRIVATE (6)

2016-08-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71042 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Aug 12 08:53:07 2016 New Revision: 239407 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239407&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR sanitizer/71042 * tsan/tsan_platform_linux.cc: Cherry-

[Bug sanitizer/71042] libtsan requires __pointer_chk_guard@GLIBC_PRIVATE (6)

2016-08-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71042 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Aug 12 08:53:07 2016 New Revision: 239407 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239407&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR sanitizer/71042 * tsan/tsan_platform_linux.cc: Cherry-

[Bug sanitizer/71042] libtsan requires __pointer_chk_guard@GLIBC_PRIVATE (6)

2016-08-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71042 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Aug 12 08:53:46 2016 New Revision: 239408 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239408&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR sanitizer/71042 * tsan/tsan_platform_linux.cc: Cherry-

[Bug sanitizer/71042] libtsan requires __pointer_chk_guard@GLIBC_PRIVATE (6)

2016-08-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71042 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/74585] SRA forces parameters to memory causing awful code generation

2016-08-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74585 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug tree-optimization/74585] SRA forces parameters to memory causing awful code generation

2016-08-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74585 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- That is, compare DECL_RTL for a in the good/bad case and see how it arrives so.

[Bug tree-optimization/74585] SRA forces parameters to memory causing awful code generation

2016-08-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74585 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Bad case: (mem/c:BLK (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 150 virtual-stack-vars) (const_int 64 [0x40])) [1 a+0 S64 A128]) #0 set_decl_rtl (t=, x=0x2c1ae960) at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/emit-rtl.c

[Bug target/74563] [6/7 regression] Classic MIPS16 (non-MIPS16e) function return broken

2016-08-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74563 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Known to work|

[Bug target/72851] [6 Regression] memory hog with -O3 on s390x-linux-gnu

2016-08-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72851 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Target Milestone|6.2

[Bug testsuite/71008] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vprord-1.c scan-assembler-times vprord

2016-08-12 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71008 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|target

[Bug libfortran/74755] New: libgfortran: build breaks if localtime_r prototype is present, but definition is not

2016-08-12 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74755 Bug ID: 74755 Summary: libgfortran: build breaks if localtime_r prototype is present, but definition is not Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug fortran/74600] [openacc] duplicate data map error

2016-08-12 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74600 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/73650] powerpc: -mcpu=e500mc hits ICE: insn does not satisfy its constraints

2016-08-12 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73650 --- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool --- [ i have a patch, it is bootstrapping+checking ] [ the revision in #c4 is a red herring ] Yeah, single_set holds for that, and LRA then treats it as a reg-reg move (because that is what the single set i

[Bug c/7652] -Wswitch-break : Warn if a switch case falls through

2016-08-12 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652 --- Comment #57 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Aug 12 10:15:57 2016 New Revision: 239409 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239409&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/7652 * tree-complex.c (expand_complex_division): A

[Bug c/7652] -Wswitch-break : Warn if a switch case falls through

2016-08-12 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652 --- Comment #58 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Aug 12 10:30:47 2016 New Revision: 239410 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239410&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/7652 gcc/ * alias.c (find_base_value): Adjust fall

[Bug c++/72865] Adding __may_alias__ attribute triggers a compilation error

2016-08-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72865 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug target/72819] [AArch64] ABI error: HFA structs of __fp16 incorrectly passed to functions

2016-08-12 Thread jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72819 --- Comment #2 from James Greenhalgh --- Author: jgreenhalgh Date: Fri Aug 12 11:26:06 2016 New Revision: 239411 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239411&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [AArch64] Handle HFAs of float16 types properly Backport from ma

[Bug tree-optimization/73434] [6/7 Regression] Wrong code with casting, branches and aliasing

2016-08-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73434 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- So it happens because we forward &objs[idx] into the dereference in the SCCVN representation which messes up base_alias_set when re-constructing an ao_ref from that. We get 3 vs. 4 here. And then in indire

[Bug middle-end/74762] New: Uncaught Wuninitialized case

2016-08-12 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74762 Bug ID: 74762 Summary: Uncaught Wuninitialized case Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end A

[Bug middle-end/74762] [5/6/7 Regression] Uncaught Wuninitialized case

2016-08-12 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74762 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5

[Bug debug/56974] c++ ref qualifiers not represented in DWARF

2016-08-12 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56974 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c/74265] address sanitizer detects stack-buffer-overflow in set_nonincremental_init_from_string in c-typeck.c

2016-08-12 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74265 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/67410] c/c-typeck.c references out of bounds array

2016-08-12 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67410 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- *** Bug 74265 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug gcov-profile/58306] Broken profiling for unrar sources: error: corrupted value profile: value profile counter (X out of Y) inconsistent with basic-block count

2016-08-12 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306 --- Comment #34 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #33) > Created attachment 39275 [details] > Patch candidate for the fallout > > Hi Andread. *Andreas > > Can you please test me the following patch. I understand why

[Bug gcov-profile/58306] Broken profiling for unrar sources: error: corrupted value profile: value profile counter (X out of Y) inconsistent with basic-block count

2016-08-12 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306 --- Comment #33 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 39275 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39275&action=edit Patch candidate for the fallout Hi Andread. Can you please test me the following patch. I understand why the s

[Bug gcov-profile/35590] Value profiling: string op -- requires power of 2 value??

2016-08-12 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35590 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Aug 12 12:12:51 2016 New Revision: 239412 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239412&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Add test coverage for PR gcov-profile/35590 PR gcov-profile/35590

[Bug gcov-profile/35590] Value profiling: string op -- requires power of 2 value??

2016-08-12 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35590 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/35590] Value profiling: string op -- requires power of 2 value??

2016-08-12 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35590 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/74762] [5/6/7 Regression] Uncaught Wuninitialized case

2016-08-12 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74762 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug gcov-profile/67097] gcov-tool merge (can) crash when dir2 contains files not in dir1

2016-08-12 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67097 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/71512] ICE: verify_gimple failed with UBSAN

2016-08-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71512 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/74762] [5/6/7 Regression] Uncaught Wuninitialized case

2016-08-12 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74762 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/65831] gcov does not output 0% coverage files

2016-08-12 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65831 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/74765] New: missing uninitialized warning (parenthesis, TREE_NO_WARNING abuse)

2016-08-12 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74765 Bug ID: 74765 Summary: missing uninitialized warning (parenthesis, TREE_NO_WARNING abuse) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/25814] Request for warning for parser ambiguity of function declarations and variable declarations with initializations

2016-08-12 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2006-03-08 05:07:27 |2016-8-12 CC|

[Bug c++/74765] missing uninitialized warning (parenthesis, TREE_NO_WARNING abuse)

2016-08-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74765 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- I wonder if we can somehow "annotate" locations with NO_WARNING (warning-option) instead of relying on bits on tree nodes / stmts. Maybe even as simple as a global hash_map that could also be used to tack

[Bug tree-optimization/57326] Piecewise folding of operations on PHI nodes

2016-08-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57326 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/57326] Piecewise folding of operations on PHI nodes

2016-08-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57326 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/67410] [5/6/7 Regression] c/c-typeck.c references out of bounds array

2016-08-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67410 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Assig

[Bug c/67410] [5/6/7 Regression] c/c-typeck.c references out of bounds array

2016-08-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67410 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Assig

[Bug c++/74765] missing uninitialized warning (parenthesis, TREE_NO_WARNING abuse)

2016-08-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74765 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/74762] [5/6/7 Regression] missing uninitialized warning (C++, parenthesized expr, TREE_NO_WARNING)

2016-08-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74762 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/74762] [5/6/7 Regression] missing uninitialized warning (C++, parenthesized expr, TREE_NO_WARNING)

2016-08-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74762 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Started most likely with r177667, r177670 doesn't warn, r177661 does.

[Bug c++/71972] [6 Regression] ICE with "-std=c++14" on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault, cxx_eval_store_expression)

2016-08-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71972 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug testsuite/71008] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vprord-1.c scan-assembler-times vprord

2016-08-12 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71008 --- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Fri Aug 12 13:44:13 2016 New Revision: 239415 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239415&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR testsuite/71008 * gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpror

[Bug tree-optimization/74585] SRA forces parameters to memory causing awful code generation

2016-08-12 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74585 --- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > The issue is not SRA pushing things to memory - it doesn't. The issue is > that in the GIMPLE IL the parameter appears as "memory" as it is an > aggregate type.

[Bug testsuite/71008] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vprord-1.c scan-assembler-times vprord

2016-08-12 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71008 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ada/74775] New: Quickbooks POS SUPPORT PHONE number ((((1.800 919 0992 Quickbooks PREMIER tech support number

2016-08-12 Thread jightaaa at mail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74775 Bug ID: 74775 Summary: Quickbooks POS SUPPORT PHONE number 1.800 919 0992 Quickbooks PREMIER tech support number Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug boehm-gc/74782] New: HP Printer Support Phone Number 1 (888) 990-8801

2016-08-12 Thread gabrurock411 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74782 Bug ID: 74782 Summary: HP Printer Support Phone Number 1 (888) 990-8801 Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug bootstrap/74784] New: HP Printer Tech Support Phone Number 1 (888) 990-8801

2016-08-12 Thread gabrurock411 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74784 Bug ID: 74784 Summary: HP Printer Tech Support Phone Number 1 (888) 990-8801 Product: gcc Version: 5.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug c++/74765] missing uninitialized warning (parenthesis, TREE_NO_WARNING abuse)

2016-08-12 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74765 --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > I wonder if we can somehow "annotate" locations with NO_WARNING > (warning-option) Wouldn't that be equivalent to internally generating a #pragma GCC diag

[Bug tree-optimization/74585] SRA forces parameters to memory causing awful code generation

2016-08-12 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74585 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On August 12, 2016 3:46:46 PM GMT+02:00, "wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74585 > >--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt --- >(In reply to Richard Bie

[Bug c++/74762] [5/6/7 Regression] missing uninitialized warning (C++, parenthesized expr, TREE_NO_WARNING)

2016-08-12 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74762 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1) > Looks like warn_uninit() suppresses the warning on 'i' because the > TREE_NO_WARNING flag is set on the ARRAY_REF by the C++ FE (in > finish_parenthesized_e

[Bug tree-optimization/69848] poor vectorization of a loop from SPEC2006 464.h264ref

2016-08-12 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69848 --- Comment #15 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Fri Aug 12 14:58:20 2016 New Revision: 239416 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239416&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/69848 * tree-vectorizer.h

[Bug c/74751] gcc can't generate correct code

2016-08-12 Thread jeanerpp at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74751 xujian changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #3 from xujian --- (In repl

[Bug c++/74765] missing uninitialized warning (parenthesis, TREE_NO_WARNING abuse)

2016-08-12 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74765 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > I had plans to turn TREE_NO_WARNING/gimple_no_warning_p into on the side > hashmap which would map trees or gimple stmts to bitmaps of OPT_W* flags > that s

[Bug target/72819] [AArch64] ABI error: HFA structs of __fp16 incorrectly passed to functions

2016-08-12 Thread jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72819 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/67410] [5/6/7 Regression] c/c-typeck.c references out of bounds array

2016-08-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67410 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Aug 12 16:04:33 2016 New Revision: 239419 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239419&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/67410 * c-typeck.c (set_nonincremental_init_from_stri

[Bug c/67410] [5/6/7 Regression] c/c-typeck.c references out of bounds array

2016-08-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67410 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Aug 12 16:05:53 2016 New Revision: 239420 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239420&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/67410 * c-typeck.c (set_nonincremental_init_from_stri

[Bug middle-end/71654] [6/7 Regression] missing VRP optimization on c++ unsigned char and short expressions

2016-08-12 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71654 --- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Fri Aug 12 16:07:40 2016 New Revision: 239421 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239421&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR middle-end/71654 (missed shortening of a compare) gcc/ChangeLog:

[Bug rtl-optimization/71956] [7 Regression] 176.gcc fails on 32 bits when compiled with -march=core-avx2

2016-08-12 Thread ysrumyan at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71956 --- Comment #3 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- It turned out that after r235653 (with minor int->bool type change) 176.gcc started RF. If we turn off vrp phase benchmark passes. The problem fail is sched.c. Note that avx2 is essential for reproducing. T

[Bug rtl-optimization/71956] [7 Regression] 176.gcc fails on 32 bits when compiled with -march=core-avx2

2016-08-12 Thread ysrumyan at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71956 --- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- Need to read "problem file is 176.gcc/src/sched.c, problem function sched_analyze_insn.

[Bug tree-optimization/71077] [7 Regression] gcc -lto raises ICE

2016-08-12 Thread ysrumyan at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71077 Yuri Rumyantsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/74881] New: re-align optimization blocks vectorization on powerpc

2016-08-12 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74881 Bug ID: 74881 Summary: re-align optimization blocks vectorization on powerpc Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug tree-optimization/71083] [5/6/7 Regression] Unaligned bit-field address when predictive commoning

2016-08-12 Thread edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71083 --- Comment #10 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Fri Aug 12 17:06:44 2016 New Revision: 239423 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239423&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-08-12 Bernd Edlinger Backport from mainline

[Bug tree-optimization/71077] [7 Regression] gcc -lto raises ICE

2016-08-12 Thread patrick at parcs dot ath.cx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71077 --- Comment #6 from patrick at parcs dot ath.cx --- On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, ysrumyan at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71077 > > Yuri Rumyantsev changed: > >What|Removed |Ad

[Bug c++/74970] New: Microsoft 24/7 online Live Number ( 1-800+492+3958) that provided byMicrosoft Office 365

2016-08-12 Thread divalisingh at yopmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74970 Bug ID: 74970 Summary: Microsoft 24/7 online Live Number ( 1-800+492+3958) that provided byMicrosoft Office 365 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug rtl-optimization/74585] powerpc64: Very poor code generation for homogeneous vector aggregates passed in registers

2016-08-12 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74585 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization Summary|SRA f

[Bug rtl-optimization/69847] Spec 2006 403.gcc slows down with -mlra vs. reload on PowerPC

2016-08-12 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847 --- Comment #26 from Andreas Krebbel --- (In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #21) > However, there appear to be performance regressions at least with cactusADM. I was not able to reproduce the regression in an non-shared environment. In fa

[Bug rtl-optimization/74585] powerpc64: Very poor code generation for homogeneous vector aggregates passed in registers

2016-08-12 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74585 --- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt --- FYI, adding -mcpu=power9 to the options makes it much easier to read the RTL, as it gets rid of the extra vector swaps needed for POWER8.

[Bug c++/75130] New: @@@@1++855++709++2847^^@@%@%@$$ Epson Printer tech support

2016-08-12 Thread wave3 at codehot dot co.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75130 Bug ID: 75130 Summary: 1++855++709++2847^^@@%@%@$$ Epson Printer tech support Product: gcc Version: 3.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug tree-optimization/71083] [5/6/7 Regression] Unaligned bit-field address when predictive commoning

2016-08-12 Thread edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71083 --- Comment #11 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Fri Aug 12 18:56:30 2016 New Revision: 239424 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239424&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-08-12 Bernd Edlinger Backport from mainline

[Bug c/72858] incorrect fixit hints in -Wformat diagnostics

2016-08-12 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72858 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Candidate patch posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg01053.html

[Bug libstdc++/68740] FAIL: experimental/type_erased_allocator/1.cc (test for excess errors)

2016-08-12 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68740 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/75173] New: vczvxczv zcx dsf sdf s adf asd

2016-08-12 Thread klfohfn at yopmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75173 Bug ID: 75173 Summary: vczvxczv zcx dsf sdf s adf asd Product: gcc Version: trans-mem Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug c++/75186] New: oll fr33 nUmBeR @@++1-888-527-3401++@@ for AVG Antivirus tech & technical suppor

2016-08-12 Thread Drythilite1976 at fleckens dot hu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75186 Bug ID: 75186 Summary: oll fr33 nUmBeR @@++1-888-527-3401++@@ for AVG Antivirus tech & technical suppor Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug lto/75194] New: -flto loses .debug_macro section

2016-08-12 Thread jim at jtan dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75194 Bug ID: 75194 Summary: -flto loses .debug_macro section Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto As

[Bug ada/75198] New: ***PrinTer call @@@@@ .1-855 709 2847 Lexmark Printer customer care

2016-08-12 Thread shrutig736 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75198 Bug ID: 75198 Summary: ***PrinTer call @ .1-855 709 2847 Lexmark Printer customer care Product: gcc Version: 4.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/75250] New: norton

2016-08-12 Thread xvfxvfxvx at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75250 Bug ID: 75250 Summary: norton Product: gcc Version: new-ra Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada Assignee: unassigned at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/71083] [5/6/7 Regression] Unaligned bit-field address when predictive commoning

2016-08-12 Thread edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71083 --- Comment #12 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Fri Aug 12 19:30:39 2016 New Revision: 239426 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239426&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-08-12 Bernd Edlinger PR tree-optimization/71083

[Bug tree-optimization/71083] [5/6/7 Regression] Unaligned bit-field address when predictive commoning

2016-08-12 Thread edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71083 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/75276] New: @%@$$$@^^@1_8OOx790x72O8 @^^@@%CANON P.r.i.n.t.e.r t.e.c.h. s.u.p.p..o.r.t p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r

2016-08-12 Thread nia77 at ov3u841 dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75276 Bug ID: 75276 Summary: @%@$$$@^^@1_8OOx790x72O8 @^^@@%CANON P.r.i.n.t.e.r t.e.c.h. s.u.p.p..o.r.t p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r Product: gcc Version: fortran-dev Status: UNCONFIR

  1   2   >