https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79012
Bug ID: 79012
Summary: basic block reordering causes suboptimal code
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79004
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79004
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner ---
This was caused by subversion id 237806 that added small integer support in
vector registers (32-bit on power8, 8/16-bit on power9). Unfortunately, the
IEEE 128-bit hardware support was not adjusted for s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79011
Bug ID: 79011
Summary: incorrect form of warning options listed in the manual
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71905
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
To get around the INT_MAX limit the -Walloc-size-larger-than accepts numbers
with suffixes like KB and MB. Other options that accept sizes should probably
accept the same suffixes for consistency.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79010
Bug ID: 79010
Summary: -Wlarger-than ineffective for VLAs, alloca, malloc
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009
Bug ID: 79009
Summary: Missing 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when
having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one
in the same declaration
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78931
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71016
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] Redundant |[6 Regression] Redundant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78890
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE on |[5/6 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78910
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78910
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Jan 5 22:32:09 2017
New Revision: 244116
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244116&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/78910 - Wrong print-return-value for a negative numbe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78973
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79007
--- Comment #2 from Bill Seurer ---
I just tried it on an x86 system and it also fails there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71016
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 5 21:14:19 2017
New Revision: 244114
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244114&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/71016
* tree-ssa-phiopt.c (tree_ssa_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78931
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 5 21:13:09 2017
New Revision: 244113
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244113&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78931
* decl.c (cp_finish_decomp): Remove probe var
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78890
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 5 21:12:02 2017
New Revision: 244112
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244112&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78890
* class.c (check_field_decls): Diagnose REFER
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79004
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner ---
Minimal test case:
bergner@genoa:~/gcc/BUGS/PR79004$ cat pr79004.i
int
main (void)
{
char ivin;
_Float64x fv2 = ivin;
}
bergner@genoa:~/gcc/BUGS/PR79004$
/home/bergner/gcc/build/gcc-fsf-mainline-reg-mov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79008
Bug ID: 79008
Summary: missing detail in -Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79007
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79007
Bug ID: 79007
Summary: [7 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/dse-points-to.c fails
starting with r244067
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79006
Bug ID: 79006
Summary: [6/7 Regression] Invalid transformation in
tree-dominators pass
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78973
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Summary|warning: ‘mem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78812
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79005
--- Comment #3 from M. McCutcheon ---
Sorry, forgot to include the actual error message, though it doesn't seem very
illuminating :
auto-lambda_sub-capture.cpp:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79005
--- Comment #2 from M. McCutcheon ---
Created attachment 40469
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40469&action=edit
Preprocessed source as requested by the error message
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78812
--- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
ABNORMAL_CALL and EH imply ABNORMAL, at least for RTL CFG according to their
documentation. I haven't gone through the trouble to see where that is
enforced, but I did very that the edges had EH and ABNORM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79005
--- Comment #1 from M. McCutcheon ---
The following code provokes an internal compiler error with :
g++ -save-temps -Wall -Wextra -std=c++14
int main()
{
auto glambda = [] (auto a)
{
const int c = a;
auto cglambda = [&]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79005
Bug ID: 79005
Summary: Use of a captured variable within nested generic
lambdas provokes internal compiler error.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63829
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79004
--- Comment #2 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Just checked and it also fails with 244106 from 20 minutes ago.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661
--- Comment #19 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to janus from comment #18)
> Created attachment 40364 [details]
> updated patch
>
> Here is an updated patch, which fixes all wrong-code issues AFAICS. It
> includes improved handling of CLASS-vs-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79004
--- Comment #1 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float64x.c also fails in the same way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79004
Bug ID: 79004
Summary: ICE in gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float128-ieee.c
with -mcpu=power9
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78977
--- Comment #13 from Hannes Hauswedell ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> So that looks like r244037 has fixed this bug. Please reopen if that is not
> the case. Given Martin's description that
> 2.999888977697537484
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78977
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79003
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79003
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351
--- Comment #48 from Martin Sebor ---
Send a check to Manuel ;) The feature is available under the
-Wnull-dereference option (see comment 31). Unfortunately, due to false
positives, the option was removed from -Wall in a subsequent commit (r226
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79002
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So do you suggest to run ehcleanup earlier, or another pass of it, or move
tailr?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78990
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78938
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77265
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78983
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78990
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78958
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78970
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Fixed on trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78970
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Jan 5 14:17:07 2017
New Revision: 244103
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244103&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Error for '-' as filename of a precompiled header (PR pch/78970)
2017-01-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
--- Comment #19 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> The commit in comment 14 has instroduced size and runtime regressions in the
> Spec2006 testsuite on s390x:
I get reproducible regressions on AArch64 as well with the latest patch
(changes >0.5%
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29333
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78973
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 40466
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40466&action=edit
unreduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79003
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79003
Bug ID: 79003
Summary: [7 Regression] r238991 breaks ODR
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79002
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79002
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Looks like (i) makes i TREE_ADDRESSABLE somehow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79002
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|s390x |s390x x86_64-*-*
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78765
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78765
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Jan 5 12:30:26 2017
New Revision: 244101
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244101&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
cp/
PR c++/78765
* pt.c (convert_nontype_argumen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351
--- Comment #47 from Jon Grant ---
I'm happy to pay a 400 USD bug bounty to contributors who introduce this
feature in GCC. Let's get this feature in! :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79002
Bug ID: 79002
Summary: Weird c++ assembly code generated for tail call
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78948
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Related questions:
Are uses of deleted functions ok in discarded stmts?
Should we warn about uses of deprecated functions/vars in discarded stmts?
Shall we ever set DECL_ODR_USED on odr-used decls in discarde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78995
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to feiz from comment #4)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > static inline void
> > rte_memcpy(void *dst, const void *src, size_t n)
> > {
> > uintptr_t dstu = (uintptr_t)dst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78948
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
During parsing, we call mark_used on the function to call, which in turn does
instantiate_decl -> add_pending_template.
So, shall we avoid calling mark_used from parser->in_discarded_stmt (we'd need
to propag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78991
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78997
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Built by
#2 0x011c1759 in vectorizable_condition (
stmt=, gsi=0x7fffd460,
vec_stmt=0x7fffd378, reduc_def=, reduc_index=0,
slp_node=0x296b8a0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79001
Bug ID: 79001
Summary: spurious "defined but not used" warning with explicit
instantiation
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78995
--- Comment #4 from feiz ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> static inline void
> rte_memcpy(void *dst, const void *src, size_t n)
> {
> uintptr_t dstu = (uintptr_t)dst;
> uintptr_t srcu = (uintptr_t)src;
>
> *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78995
--- Comment #3 from feiz ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Does adding -fno-strict-aliasing fix the problem you are seeing?
>
> I am suspecting the code is violating C/C++ aliasing rules.
Yeah, that's right. I try the -fno-stric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79000
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77734
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78979
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78995
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78997
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78978
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78815
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78815
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Jan 5 09:16:50 2017
New Revision: 244095
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244095&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Do not sanitize in an abnormal context (PR sanitizer/78815).
2017-01-05
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76957
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78342
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78342
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Summar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Summar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78652
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78812
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 4 Jan 2017, law at redhat dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78812
>
> Jeffrey A. Law changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78880
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
83 matches
Mail list logo