https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71406
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72785
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79168
--- Comment #2 from Brian Rzycki ---
Hello Jakub. Thank you for the fast response. We have verified that gcc with
your patch successfully compiles. We haven't done any real testing on the
compiler itself though.
I think it'd be good to push that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72785
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79198
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
I also saw this on Linux/i686.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77508
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72785
--- Comment #26 from James Greenhalgh ---
(In reply to dhowe...@redhat.com from comment #21)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #20)
> > *** Bug 78879 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>
> Kernel bug or not, it should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79037
--- Comment #12 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Jan 23 18:15:22 2017
New Revision: 244824
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244824&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/79037
compiler, runtime: align gc data for m68k
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79197
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Actually, it ICEs for me only if auto-host.h doesn't have HAVE_POPCNTD defined.
And the problem is in mismatch of the conditions:
(define_expand "fixuns_truncdi2"
[(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72785
--- Comment #27 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #26)
> (In reply to dhowe...@redhat.com from comment #21)
> > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #20)
> > > *** Bug 78879 has been marked as a dupl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79037
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78936
Alexandre Pereira Nunes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexandre.nunes at gmail dot
c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79197
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Ah I can reproduce it now... -mcpu=power7 -mno-popcntd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79197
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yeah, or -mcpu=power8 -mno-popcntd -mvsx -mvsx-scalar-double even if gas has
power7/power8 support.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70012
--- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt ---
It looks to me like vect_alignment_reachable is the wrong test to be using
here. This is equivalent to vect_aligned_arrays || natural_alignment_32.
vect_aligned_array is always 0 for powerpc*-*-*. natural_a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79176
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78936
--- Comment #2 from Reid Kleckner ---
That option does not appear to affect the linked portions of the assembly. The
" [clone .constprop.544]" transform still appears to fire.
I will run the complete build and get back soon.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70012
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wschmidt at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56727
--- Comment #7 from Yuri Gribov ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #6)
> Note that even without symbol aliases, such calls are not necessarily
> self-recursive when 'f' is first called via dlsym with RTLD_NEXT or a
> specific module
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79082
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Except for #8, none of the sprintf calls in the extended testcase in attachment
40566 can be handled as accurately at -O0 as with optimization because the
arguments to the format directives are treated as if t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79082
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
> case 3. You can see that in the dump created by the -ftree-dump-vrp option
> where the argument is assumed to include the negative subrange:
>
> Value ranges after VRP:
> ...
> iftmp.0_11: [-99, 99]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79198
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71406
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon Jan 23 20:19:07 2017
New Revision: 244832
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244832&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71406 - ICE with scope-ref'd template id exprs
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77508
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon Jan 23 20:19:07 2017
New Revision: 244832
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244832&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71406 - ICE with scope-ref'd template id exprs
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77508
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71406
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79165
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71710
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71710
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon Jan 23 20:24:32 2017
New Revision: 244833
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244833&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71710 - template using directive of field
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79192
--- Comment #1 from ricilake at gmail dot com ---
Thanks to Johannes Schaub-litb (via SO), the problem appears to be at around
line 16781 of cp/parser.c:
/* There is no valid C++ program where a non-template type is
followed by a "
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79165
--- Comment #12 from David Malcolm ---
Looking at the line maps, we have a sane list of ordinary linemaps, but then
the linemap_add call at line 4761 here:
4758tree
4759build_translation_unit_decl (tree name)
4760{
4761 linemap_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79165
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|dmalcolm at gcc d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79198
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
I am about to test the following, which fixes the test from comment
#1. It does fix a clear bug in the patch I committed today, without
it there we multitudes of identical cgraph duplication hooks active at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79192
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79200
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78936
--- Comment #3 from Reid Kleckner ---
The compiled code still fails at runtime during an LLVM build in the same way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56727
--- Comment #8 from Alexander Monakov ---
Well, if my argument is correct, then GCC generates wrong code for the very
first example in comment #0. If that is deliberate as a compromise even though
otherwise GCC suppresses optimizations to honor p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79198
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor ---
And based on the IRC discussion I had earlier today with Markus, I
have also added the following to the patch I'm bootstrapping, even
though it is not strictly necessary to prevent OOM in the testcase
from co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78420
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Ville Voutilainen from comment #11)
> Ah, the plot thickens. Jens Maurer wrote:
>
> "Regarding the std::less issue, it seems a bug in the standard
> to require that it be constexpr and deliver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78420
--- Comment #14 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Not in general, no, it doesn't have to always give a compile-time answer. But I
believe the library intent is that when it compares compile-time constant
pointers, it should give that answer at compile-t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77300
--- Comment #6 from Maciej W. Rozycki ---
Fixed in binutils now:
commit 65060a78866f374e25f4668d12efc783235d19d1
Author: Maciej W. Rozycki
Date: Wed Jan 18 18:18:21 2017 +
PR gas/20649: MIPS: Fix GOT16/LO16 reloc pairing with comdat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78420
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Ville Voutilainen from comment #14)
> Not in general, no, it doesn't have to always give a compile-time answer.
> But I believe the library intent is that when it compares compile-time
> constan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79071
Maciej W. Rozycki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ma...@linux-mips.org
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79088
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Jan 23 22:29:17 2017
New Revision: 244837
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244837&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-23 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/79088
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79188
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Jan 23 22:29:17 2017
New Revision: 244837
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244837&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-23 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/79088
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79188
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79088
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78420
Jens Maurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jens.maurer at gmx dot net
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79193
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from sandr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78420
--- Comment #17 from Ville Voutilainen ---
(In reply to Jens Maurer from comment #16)
> I'd like to point out that there is no prohibition against writing
> reinterpret_cast inside a constexpr function. It's just if you call that
> function and a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78420
--- Comment #18 from Jens Maurer ---
Then you should cheat on [dcl.constexpr] p5 by carving out the nullptr case:
constexpr void less_than(int *p1, int *p2)
{
if (p1 == nullptr && p2 == nullptr)
return false;
return (size_t)p1 < (size_t)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77445
--- Comment #21 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
In response to c#20. We have to be careful about fixing up the loop after
rotation and avoid repeatedly peeling. The old threader dealt with those by
being fairly conservative in passes before the loop op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78420
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jens Maurer from comment #16)
> That means the standard library needs to do its homework to clearly specify
> under which circumstances (which argument types) it expects a constexpr
> function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79202
Bug ID: 79202
Summary: On Power8, consider using vupkhsw/xxpermdi to sign
extend an int in a vector register instead of
mfvsrwz/mtvsrwa
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79202
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77445
--- Comment #22 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
In response to c#19. Yes, a thread path which is cold except for a hot block
in the middle might be profitable to thread as it will sometimes expose path
specific redundancies/simplifications in the hot bl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79203
Bug ID: 79203
Summary: Update PowerPC double->int conversions to know about
-mvsx-small-integer
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79203
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79168
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 24 00:18:36 2017
New Revision: 244844
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244844&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/79168
* merge.sh (change_comment_headers): Do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78703
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Jan 24 00:55:19 2017
New Revision: 244845
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244845&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78703 - -fprintf-return-value floating point handling incorr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78703
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Jan 24 01:06:34 2017
New Revision: 244846
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244846&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78703 - -fprintf-return-value floating point handling incorr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78703
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Jan 24 01:10:10 2017
New Revision: 244847
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244847&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78703 - -fprintf-return-value floating point handling incorr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
--- Comment #4 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kelvin
Date: Tue Jan 24 01:26:13 2017
New Revision: 244850
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244850&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-01-23 Kelvin Nilsen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79204
Bug ID: 79204
Summary: improve -Woverflow by mentioning types and values
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78763
--- Comment #12 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Jan 24 03:34:14 2017
New Revision: 244852
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244852&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/78763
Backported from mainline:
compiler:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79205
Bug ID: 79205
Summary: ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.c:473
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79206
Bug ID: 79206
Summary: string_view operator== could do an early exit if sizes
differ
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79168
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
101 - 168 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
