[Bug target/83831] [RX] Unused bclr,bnot,bset insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83831 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/83831] [RX] Unused bclr,bnot,bset insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83831 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #43270|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/83831] [RX] Unused bclr,bnot,bset insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83831 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #43266|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/86205] [9 Regression] ICE on valid C++11 code: in type_dependent_expression_p, at cp/pt.c:25193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86205 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/86182] [8/9 Regression] gcc crashes when compiling the code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86182 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/86200] [8/9 Regression] ICE in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:24634

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86200 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86200] [8/9 Regression] ICE in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:24634

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86200 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jun 19 00:38:58 2018 New Revision: 261730 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261730=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/86200 - ICE with unexpanded pack in lambda parameter. *

[Bug c++/81060] [8 Regression] ICE with un-expanded parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81060 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jun 19 00:38:26 2018 New Revision: 261725 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261725=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81060 - ICE with unexpanded parameter pack. * pt.c

[Bug c++/81060] [8 Regression] ICE with un-expanded parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81060 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jun 19 00:38:52 2018 New Revision: 261729 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261729=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81060 - ICE with unexpanded parameter pack. * pt.c

[Bug c++/86200] [8/9 Regression] ICE in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:24634

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86200 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jun 19 00:38:32 2018 New Revision: 261726 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261726=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/86200 - ICE with unexpanded pack in lambda parameter. *

[Bug c++/86201] ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86201 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- The problem here is that we report the missing return value: 9224 permerror (input_location, "return-statement with no value, in " 9225"function returning %qT", valtype); but

[Bug middle-end/82063] issues with arguments enabled by -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82063 --- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Jun 19 00:02:30 2018 New Revision: 261720 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261720=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/82063 - issues with arguments enabled by -Wall gcc/ChangeLog:

[Bug libstdc++/86188] Enhancement to std::merge, constexpr check of iterator types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86188 --- Comment #2 from Josh Marshall --- That looks similar enough. But I think the Bidirectional iterator tag in the case of sorting is expressive enough and for std::merge, either forward iterator tags or output iterator tags would express the

[Bug c++/84918] Better handling of "std::cout >> 42;"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84918 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84920] Better handling of unmatched/ambiguous calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84920 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/82063] issues with arguments enabled by -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82063 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Mon Jun 18 23:31:53 2018 New Revision: 261719 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261719=gcc=rev Log: PR c/82063 - issues with arguments enabled by -Wall gcc/ChangeLog: PR

[Bug c++/86205] New: ICE on valid C++11 code: in type_dependent_expression_p, at cp/pt.c:25193

/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/home/su/software/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 9.0.0 20180618 (experimental

[Bug middle-end/85602] -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess for strncat with size of source

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85602 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Adjusted patch committed into trunk in r261718.

[Bug middle-end/85602] -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess for strncat with size of source

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85602 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Mon Jun 18 22:17:57 2018 New Revision: 261718 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261718=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/85602 - -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess for strncat with size of source

[Bug tree-optimization/86199] warn on calls to strlen with same argument as in strnlen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86199 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- Ditto for strdup vs strndup, although there it might be worth considering diagnosing only calls where the strndup bound is equal the size of the source array, as in: char a[4], *p, *q; void f (void) { p =

[Bug middle-end/86202] [8/9 Regression] ICE in get_range_info, at tree-ssanames.c:407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86202 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org See

[Bug c/86196] [9 Regression] Bogus -Wrestrict on memcpy between array elements at unequal indices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86196 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/86196] [9 Regression] Bogus -Wrestrict on memcpy between array elements at unequal indices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86196 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug c++/86200] [8/9 Regression] ICE in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:24634

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86200 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/86191] Partial ordering with an expression involving non-type template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86191 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED Summary|[6/7/8/9

[Bug tree-optimization/86204] [9 Regression] wrong strlen result after prior strnlen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86204 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg01087.html

[Bug tree-optimization/86204] [9 Regression] wrong strlen result after prior strnlen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86204 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/86204] New: [9 Regression] wrong strlen result after prior strnlen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86204 Bug ID: 86204 Summary: [9 Regression] wrong strlen result after prior strnlen Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/85358] PowerPC: Using -mabi=ieeelongdouble -mcpu=power9 breaks __ibm128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85358 --- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Mon Jun 18 19:10:08 2018 New Revision: 261712 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261712=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2018-06-18 Michael Meissner PR target/85358 *

[Bug c++/86193] [7/8/9 Regression] A recurring bug?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86193 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED --- Comment #2 from Jason

[Bug tree-optimization/86203] duplicate non-constant call to strlen() not folded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86203 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization See Also|

[Bug c/86202] [8/9 Regression] ICE in get_range_info, at tree-ssanames.c:407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86202 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/86203] New: duplicate non-constant call to strlen() not folded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86203 Bug ID: 86203 Summary: duplicate non-constant call to strlen() not folded Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/86202] [8/9 Regression] ICE in get_range_info, at tree-ssanames.c:407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86202 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Target

[Bug c/86202] [8/9 Regression] ICE in get_range_info, at tree-ssanames.c:407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86202 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/86201] ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86201 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/86202] New: [8/9 Regression] ICE in get_range_info, at tree-ssanames.c:407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86202 Bug ID: 86202 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in get_range_info, at tree-ssanames.c:407 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/86200] [8/9 Regression] ICE in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:24634

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86200 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c++/86201] New: ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86201 Bug ID: 86201 Summary: ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/86200] New: [8/9 Regression] ICE in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:24634

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86200 Bug ID: 86200 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:24634 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/85905] cannot build for netbsd/alpha (with patch)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85905 coypu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71659] _xgetbv intrinsic missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71659 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to postmaster from comment #2) > Portability is one main reason to add missing intrinsics... with combination > of cpuid check and _xgetbv() we can cleanly check if AVX or MPX is available > at

[Bug c++/86171] [6/7/8/9 Regression] g++ ICE on valid code: tree check: expected var_decl or function_decl, have type_decl in duplicate_decls, at cp/decl.c:2291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86171 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86171] [6/7/8/9 Regression] g++ ICE on valid code: tree check: expected var_decl or function_decl, have type_decl in duplicate_decls, at cp/decl.c:2291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86171 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 18 18:16:38 2018 New Revision: 261709 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261709=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/86171 - ICE with recursive alias instantiation. * pt.c

[Bug tree-optimization/86199] warn on calls to strlen with same argument as in strnlen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86199 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/86199] warn on calls to strlen with same argument as in strnlen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86199 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/86199] New: warn on calls to strlen with same argument as in strnlen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86199 Bug ID: 86199 Summary: warn on calls to strlen with same argument as in strnlen Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/86195] [9 Regression] Ref-qualified nested class member function issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86195 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Known to work|

[Bug other/86198] New: Libbacktrace does not properly work with ".note.gnu.build-id" section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86198 Bug ID: 86198 Summary: Libbacktrace does not properly work with ".note.gnu.build-id" section Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/86171] [6/7/8/9 Regression] g++ ICE on valid code: tree check: expected var_decl or function_decl, have type_decl in duplicate_decls, at cp/decl.c:2291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86171 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- A well-formed variant: template struct A; template using B = typename A::X; template struct A { typedef int X; typedef B U; }; B b;

[Bug lto/86175] LTO code generator does not respect ld -u option to force symbol inclusion in the link product

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86175 zenith432 at users dot sourceforge.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/81384] built-in form of strnlen missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81384 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/83819] [meta-bug] missing strlen optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83819 Bug 83819 depends on bug 81384, which changed state. Bug 81384 Summary: built-in form of strnlen missing https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81384 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/81384] built-in form of strnlen missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81384 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Mon Jun 18 16:32:59 2018 New Revision: 261705 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261705=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/81384 - built-in form of strnlen missing gcc/ChangeLog:

[Bug c++/86195] Ref-qualified nested class member function issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86195 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Monteverde --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > This started to fail on trunk with r251438 > > It seems to have been fixed on the gcc-8-branch though. 8.1.1 is not a > release, we need to know exactly

[Bug c++/86195] Ref-qualified nested class member function issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86195 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/86197] POWERPC: float128 parameter passing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86197 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/86197] POWERPC: float128 parameter passing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86197 --- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt --- Note, this is restricted to powerpc64le using ELFv2 ABI.

[Bug target/86197] POWERPC: float128 parameter passing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86197 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/86197] New: POWERPC: float128 parameter passing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86197 Bug ID: 86197 Summary: POWERPC: float128 parameter passing Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug c/86196] New: Bogus -Wrestrict on memcpy

: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sbergman at redhat dot com Target Milestone: --- With recent trunk (on Linux x86_64), and doesn't seem to be covered by existing bugs referenced from meta bug 84774: > $ gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20180618 (experimental) > Copyright

[Bug lto/86175] LTO code generator does not respect ld -u option to force symbol inclusion in the link product

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86175 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libstdc++/86189] not equal allocators not behaving as expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86189 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- [allocator.requirements]

[Bug lto/86175] LTO code generator does not respect ld -u option to force symbol inclusion in the link product

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86175 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/86195] New: Ref-qualified nested class member function issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86195 Bug ID: 86195 Summary: Ref-qualified nested class member function issue Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/86189] not equal allocators not behaving as expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86189 --- Comment #4 from Rian Quinn --- Nope, I think that is the root of the issue. Where exactly does the spec state that as this is the first I have heard of this. Thanks a ton, - Rian On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 6:31 AM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org <

[Bug sanitizer/80414] [UBSAN] segfault with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80414 Denis Khalikov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86180] Friend function definition not instantiated in certain circumstances

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86180 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82204] G++ doesn't connect friend and extern declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82204 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/82204] G++ doesn't connect friend and extern declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82204 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zhonghao at pku dot org.cn ---

[Bug c++/86074] gcc fails to compile a code sample

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86074 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bluescarni at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/78925] Inline friend template function not hidden during ADL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78925 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86191] [6/7/8/9 Regression] A missing error message?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86191 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Known

[Bug c++/86182] [8/9 Regression] gcc crashes when compiling the code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86182 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|accepts-invalid,|ice-on-valid-code,

[Bug c++/86191] A missing error message?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86191 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- This changed with GCC 4.5, it was ambiguous before then.

[Bug c++/86191] A missing error message?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86191 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 --- Comment #61 from Andrew Jenner --- Sorry, once again I have been totally swamped by other work. It's now looking like I should have some time to work on this in early July.

[Bug libstdc++/86189] not equal allocators not behaving as expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86189 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/86189] not equal allocators not behaving as expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86189 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Rian Quinn from comment #0) > template > myallocator4(const myallocator4 ) noexcept > { (void) other; } You know you can just not name a parameter, instead of casting it to void?

[Bug c++/27557] OpenMP threadprivate directive does not work with non-POD types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27557 Yves Vandriessche changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yves.vandriessche at intel dot com

[Bug libstdc++/86189] not equal allocators not behaving as expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86189 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/86183] Scoped enumeration instantiated even if not required

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86183 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/79009] Missing 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zhonghao at pku dot org.cn ---

[Bug c++/86185] gcc does not reject the ill-formed code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86185 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86184] Shall gcc support this feature?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86184 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/86076] [7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: location references block not in block tree)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86076 --- Comment #7 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Mon Jun 18 12:17:10 2018 New Revision: 261699 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261699=gcc=rev Log: [testsuite] Add target pthread to pr86076.c Add missing target pthread to ensure test

[Bug c++/86190] [6/7/8/9 Regression] -Wsign-conversion ignores explicit conversion in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86190 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/86193] [7/8/9 Regression] A recurring bug?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86193 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/86177] Wnull-dereference warning for object file compile missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86177 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Lots of functions have such requirements and make it the caller's responsibility to meet those requirements. GCC is not a static analyser, you can't expect warnings about every possible bug in your code.

[Bug c++/86176] Wnull-dereference warning disappears with a call to std::cout on the line after

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86176 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- No, because GCC is not a static analyser.

[Bug c++/86190] [6/7/8/9 Regression] -Wsign-conversion ignores explicit conversion in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86190 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Further reduced: typedef unsigned long size_t; struct vector { typedef size_t size_type; size_type size(); }; bool func(vector vec, int var) { return vec.size() < static_cast(var); } sc.cc: In

[Bug c++/86190] [6/7/8/9 Regression]-Wsign-conversion ignores explicit conversion in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86190 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Known to work|

[Bug target/86194] [8/9 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in avoid_constant_pool_reference (simplify-rtx.c:215) with -O -g -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86194 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/86193] [7/8/9 Regression] A recurring bug?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86193 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/64946] [AArch64] gcc.target/aarch64/vect-abs-compile.c - "abs" vectorization fails for char/short types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug target/86194] New: [8/9 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in avoid_constant_pool_reference (simplify-rtx.c:215) with -O -g -mavx512bw

rap-amd64 Thread model: posix gcc version 9.0.0 20180618 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c++/86193] New: A recurring bug?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86193 Bug ID: 86193 Summary: A recurring bug? Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug libstdc++/86188] Enhancement to std::merge, constexpr check of iterator types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86188 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- See Bug 65861 which looks relevant, especially Bug 65861 comment 9

[Bug c++/80061] error on constexpr function with an unevaluated throw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80061 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zhonghao at pku dot org.cn ---

[Bug c++/86192] A not fully fixed bug?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86192 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >