https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54613
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86376
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
This configure line seems to work:
../trunk/configure --prefix=/home/dcb/gcc/results.262304.ubsan \
--with-build-config=bootstrap-ubsan \
--disable-multilib \
--disable-werror \
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86380
Bug ID: 86380
Summary: Incorrect inequality in function chose_multiplier in
file expmed.c in GCC.8.1.0 and earlier versions
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50928
--- Comment #17 from Eric Gallager ---
*** Bug 63683 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63683
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50928
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34777
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57054
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15896
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842
--- Comment #15 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #14)
> Arseny, in the meantime if by chance you have another x86_64 variant of this
> failure that doesn't require -funroll-all-loops, please post it as well.
Fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77357
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86190
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #20 from Eric Galla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86379
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86379
Bug ID: 86379
Summary: Class member access of |using|'d field goes horribly
awry in presence of templates
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86377
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to U.Mutlu from comment #8)
> It is possible to fix all the warnings and then use -Werror.
But only today. Tomorrow's compilers will have different warnings. And
yesterday's compilers too.
I thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86377
--- Comment #8 from U.Mutlu ---
If one activates -Werror then it won't build as it then treats the warnings as
error. And there are many warnings currently suppressed.
That means -Werror is deactivated by default, and IMO never activated by any o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86285
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Mon Jul 2 21:25:10 2018
New Revision: 262320
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262320&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Set up ieee128_float_type_node correctly (PR86285)
We shoul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85894
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86377
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85716
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5)
> I think I remember someone suggesting a progress bar at one point; it
> involved hacking the pass manager...
>
> (confirmed)
Right, I found the thread (I think
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86377
--- Comment #6 from U.Mutlu ---
The configure scripts in the subdirs/libs (like libiberty) do compile some test
codes to populate the config.h of the subdir.
And there the difference happens if -Wuninitialized is treated as error,
ie. if user se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86377
--- Comment #5 from U.Mutlu ---
The configure scripts in the subdirs/libs (like libiberty) do compile some test
codes to populate the config.h of the subdir.
And there the difference happens if -Wuninitialized is treated as error,
ie. if user se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86368
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It might be reasonable for GCC to silently ignore attributes that use an
unrecognized attribute-namespace. If somebody uses [[clang::foobar]] or
[[acme::rocketboots]] they probably aren't expecting GCC to h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45305
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jul 2 19:28:11 2018
New Revision: 262316
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262316&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-02 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/45305
* expr.c : Add a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86378
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86378
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86378
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86378
Bug ID: 86378
Summary: [7/8/9 regression] typedef breaks functional cast in
noexcept-qualifier
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86354
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86376
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> I'll take a look.
Thanks. This configure line seems to work ok:
../trunk/configure --prefix=/home/dcb/gcc/results.262304.ubsan \
--with-build-config=bo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86377
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
NEED_DECLARATION_ERRNO should not be defined for most targets/hosts. You need
to figure out why it is being defined here. Look at config.log to figure that
out.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86377
--- Comment #3 from U.Mutlu ---
As said in the Remarks, the bug originally was triggered in this file in the
trunk:
../gcc_trunk/libiberty/pex-common.c:28
#include
#ifdef NEED_DECLARATION_ERRNO
extern int errno;
#endif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86377
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
In fact is required to define it as a macro in C, and a footnote
says:
"The macro errno need not be the identifier of an object. It might expand to a
modifiable lvalue resulting from a function call (for e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86377
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86377
Bug ID: 86377
Summary: extern int errno; is treated as buggy function
declaration [-Werror=strict-prototypes]
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86331
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86331
--- Comment #13 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Jul 2 16:29:24 2018
New Revision: 262315
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262315&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/86331
os: check return value as well as error fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86331
--- Comment #12 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Jul 2 16:28:58 2018
New Revision: 262314
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262314&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/86331
os: check return value as well as error fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86331
--- Comment #11 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Jul 2 16:28:43 2018
New Revision: 262313
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262313&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/86331
os: check return value as well as error fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81577
Romain Geissler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot
com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86274
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86274
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86368
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86243
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86366
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86376
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86366
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Jul 2 14:54:07 2018
New Revision: 262311
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262311&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix GCOV scan pattern (PR testsuite/86366).
2018-07-02 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86376
Bug ID: 86376
Summary: recent breakage in ubsan build ?
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86363
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 2 13:32:26 2018
New Revision: 262307
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262307&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-02 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/86363
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86363
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86375
Bug ID: 86375
Summary: Lambda call in template parameter causes compile time
error
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86374
Bug ID: 86374
Summary: [8 regression] template member name lookup problem
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86274
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86030
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
Hmm according to 45749 with `HAVE_GNU_LD` on it should work for the ld call. I
will give that a try.
But the environment variable one is still an issue as far as I can tell.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86030
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86372
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #4 from janus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86373
Bug ID: 86373
Summary: Destructor shall not be instantiated in C++17 mode for
prvalue
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865
--- Comment #14 from Fritz Reese ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #13)
>
> It seems the backport caused a caused quite a number on testsuite failures
> on the gcc-7 branch:
> ...
I reverted the backport in r262260. Are you certain that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44333|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86367
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86366
avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86372
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86371
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86366
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86363
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173
Bug 82173 depends on bug 82865, which changed state.
Bug 82865 Summary: Option -fdec collides with PDT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85504
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86372
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> I get the warning with gcc8 and trunk (9.0), but the output is the expected
> one:
>
> **123*
Oh,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86372
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86363
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86369
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Clang trunk also rejects it for the same reason, icc accepts it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56670
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Allocatable-length |Allocatable-length
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86372
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86372
Bug ID: 86372
Summary: [8/9 Regression] Segfault on ASSOCIATE statement with
CHARACTER variable
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86369
Nicolas Lesser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||blitzrakete at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56670
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86321
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 2 08:00:47 2018
New Revision: 262301
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262301&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-02 Richard Biener
PR lto/86321
* trans-type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86321
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86279
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86323
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45305
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jul 2 07:24:43 2018
New Revision: 262300
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262300&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-02 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/45305
* expr.c : Add a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45305
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45305
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jul 2 07:20:27 2018
New Revision: 262299
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262299&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-07-02 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/45305
* expr.c : Add a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86279
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Jul 2 07:04:20 2018
New Revision: 262298
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262298&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Revert 2 ::get to ::get_create for IPA summaries (PR ipa/86279).
2018-07-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86323
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Jul 2 07:04:01 2018
New Revision: 262297
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262297&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Revert one ipa_call_summaries::get to get_create (PR ipa/86323).
2018-07-
88 matches
Mail list logo