https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90387
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91730
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g |powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89795
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #9 from Eri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91730
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91709
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91730
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 46869
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46869&action=edit
Dump file without problematic transformation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91730
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 46868
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46868&action=edit
Dump file with problematic transformation
For the 453.povray (which fails with --size=test), the problematic fil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90387
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Bernd Buschinski from comment #6)
> From the comments I assumed that the fix is kind of trivial
There is a simple change that gives the behavior you want on one example, but
it is far from trivial
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91730
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
The transformation is from:
_663 = T1$1_55 + _293;
_651 = (float) _663;
where T1$1_55 and _293 are doubles. To:
_758 = (float) T1$1_55;
_759 = (float) _293;
_760 = _758 + _759;
_651 = (float) _7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91716
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91718
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91730
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> The transformation is from:
>
> _663 = T1$1_55 + _293;
> _651 = (float) _663;
>
> where T1$1_55 and _293 are doubles. To:
>
> _758 = (float) T1$1_55;
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91730
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Note in all cases of the testcases coming with the patch the sources are
eventually casted from float to double.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91730
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 91730, which changed state.
Bug 91730 Summary: [10 regression] r275518 causes 3 verification errors in the
cpu 2006 test suite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91730
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90387
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
So it's the following passes (if you ignore that with -fopenacc we already
fold b_c_p during early opts):
NEXT_PASS (pass_vrp, true /* warn_array_bounds_p */);
NEXT_PASS (pass_dce);
NEXT_P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91725
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Sep 11 08:33:55 2019
New Revision: 275633
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275633&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/91725
* match.pd ((A / (1 << B)) -> (A >> B)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91723
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Sep 11 08:34:41 2019
New Revision: 275634
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275634&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/91723
* tree-vect-stmts.c (vectorizab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91723
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10 Regression] builtin |[9 Regression] builtin fma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91725
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91720
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #9)
> > That change added the && !REG_P in there, but unless the reg is loaded from
> > memory, it is unclear how it can guarantee that the upper bits are zero
> > (re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91719
--- Comment #9 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> CCing AMD too.
Sure Let me check if this tuning helps AMD Zen Arch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91734
Bug ID: 91734
Summary: gcc skip an if statement with "-O1 -ffast-math"
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91720
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Does that also fix PR89795?
Yes, I'm going to fix PR89795 and let you check what happens for this one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91735
Bug ID: 91735
Summary: Runtime regression for SPEC2000 177.mesa on Haswell
around the end of August 2018
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91721
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91722
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91731
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91556
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||damian at sourceryinstitute
dot or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91724
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91729
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91726
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91732
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, openmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91732
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91734
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
So two things:
-funsafe-math-optimizations
assumes there are no denormals (subnormals) or they are flushed to zero.
-ffinite-math-only
assumes that infinite and nans don't exists (IIRC).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90767
Bartosz Szreder changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bartosz.szreder@huuugegames
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91736
Bug ID: 91736
Summary: Runtime regression for SPEC2000 252.eon on Haswell
around beginning of February 2019
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91735
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91735
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Errr, before we _dont_ vectorize.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91737
Bug ID: 91737
Summary: On Alpine Linux (libmusl) a statically linked C++
program which throws the first exception in two
threads at the same time can busy spin on shutdown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91735
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Reducing the VF here should be the goal. For the particular case "filling"
the holes with neutral data and blending in the original values at store time
will likely be optimal. So do
tem = vector load
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89795
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Sep 11 10:41:27 2019
New Revision: 275635
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275635&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/89795
* rtlanal.c (nonzero_bits1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89795
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Sep 11 10:42:31 2019
New Revision: 275636
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275636&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/89795
* rtlanal.c (nonzero_bits1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89795
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Sep 11 10:43:19 2019
New Revision: 275637
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275637&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/89795
* rtlanal.c (nonzero_bits1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89795
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Sep 11 10:44:06 2019
New Revision: 275638
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275638&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/89795
* rtlanal.c (nonzero_bits1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89795
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91736
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91734
--- Comment #2 from Chinoune ---
Replacing `if( az
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90387
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Sep 11 11:16:54 2019
New Revision: 275639
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275639&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-11 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/90387
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90387
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Summary|[9/10 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89795
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Sep 11 11:37:39 2019
New Revision: 275642
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275642&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/89435
PR rtl-optimization/89795
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91720
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Sep 11 11:37:39 2019
New Revision: 275642
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275642&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/89435
PR rtl-optimization/89795
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89435
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Sep 11 11:37:39 2019
New Revision: 275642
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275642&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/89435
PR rtl-optimization/89795
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91720
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89795
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 91720 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82738
Bug 82738 depends on bug 91720, which changed state.
Bug 91720 Summary: [10 Regression] wrong code with -Og -fno-forward-propagate
-frerun-cse-after-loop -fno-tree-fre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91720
What|Remove
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91736
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91735
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91735
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Reducing the VF here should be the goal. For the particular case "filling"
> the holes with neutral data and blending in the original values at store time
> will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91735
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91735
>
> --- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91732
--- Comment #3 from Jed Brown ---
> why not use gsym[Q*2*j+i] instead of g[j][0] and similarly gsym[Q*2-j*Q+i]
> instead of g[j][1]?
The pattern here is that gsym is packed storage of a symmetric 2x2 matrix,
while g unpacks it so that inner loo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91735
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91735
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91712
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91735
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
The most trivial improvement is likely to recognize the vector parts we can
store via HImode. There's already support for that but only if we can
uniformly
use HImode and not a mix of sizes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91735
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> The most trivial improvement is likely to recognize the vector parts we can
> store via HImode. There's already support for that but only if we can
> uniformly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91700
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91738
Bug ID: 91738
Summary: [10 regression] gcc.target/arm/pr53447-5.c fails since
r274823
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91735
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Can't really decipher what clang does here. it seems to handle even/odd
lanes separately, doing 24 vpextrb stores per loop iteration. Possibly
simply an interleaving scheme...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91738
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91734
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91739
Bug ID: 91739
Summary: Missed optimization for arithmetic operations of
integers and floating point constants
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91734
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91497
--- Comment #9 from Manfred Schwarb ---
Hi Steve,
I tried your patch in comment 4, it is a good starting point.
However, SNGL and DBLE still throw warnings:
real*4 a,aa
real*8 b,bb
real*10 c,cc
real*16 d
integer*2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91734
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Even in the default rounding mode, cases where c2 is equal to zero are clearly
problematic as this testcase shows, but also cases where c is subnormal.
E.g.
sqrtf (x) < 0x1.2dd3d0p-65f is true for x 0x1.63dbc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91497
--- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 02:25:23PM +, manfred99 at gmx dot ch wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91497
>
> --- Comment #9 from Manfred Schwarb ---
> Hi Steve,
>
> I tried your patch i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91740
Bug ID: 91740
Summary: ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2429
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91740
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91740
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91734
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 46871
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46871&action=edit
gcc10-pr91734.patch
Untested patch that does the 2), though for LE_EXPR only.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91741
Bug ID: 91741
Summary: Implement new warning -Wsizeof-array-div
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91742
Bug ID: 91742
Summary: User defined conversion references
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91742
--- Comment #1 from Diego ---
The code does work when changing std::vector for any primitive types, i.e.
int.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91741
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91741
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91742
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Diego from comment #0)
> I read through the c++17 standard and did not find any information about
> this behavior being implementation defined.
It's not implementation defined, but I think all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91742
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Reduced:
#define assert(C) if (!(C)) { __builtin_puts("Assertion failed: " #C);
__builtin_abort(); }
struct X {
X() { }
X(const X&) { }
};
struct A
{
operator const X&() const
{
return a_;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91743
Bug ID: 91743
Summary: ice: tree check: expected ssa_name, have mult_expr in
get_nonzero_bits, at tree-ssanames.c:524
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91738
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91742
--- Comment #4 from Diego Franco ---
> It's not implementation defined, but I think all implementations are required
> to do what GCC 8 does (and other compilers agree).
It worked on linaro 7.4.1 gcc with c++17, gcc 7.1.0 with c++17 only.
> If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91742
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Diego Franco from comment #4)
> It worked on linaro 7.4.1 gcc with c++17, gcc 7.1.0 with c++17 only.
Yes, sometimes old versions have incorrect behaviour and they get fixed.
I agree this is s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91742
--- Comment #6 from Diego Franco ---
Also the brace initialization works with primitive types for the code I posted
in the first place. That's definitely a code smell.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91742
--- Comment #7 from Diego Franco ---
This works:
#include
#include
struct A
{
operator const int&() const
{
return a_;
}
int a_;
};
int main()
{
A a {};
const auto& b1 {static_cast(a)};
const int& b2 {a};
assert(&a.a_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91678
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91642
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Wed Sep 11 18:27:17 2019
New Revision: 275655
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275655&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-11 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/91642
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91553
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Wed Sep 11 18:37:31 2019
New Revision: 275657
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275657&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-11 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/91553
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85401
--- Comment #5 from coypu ---
Created attachment 46872
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46872&action=edit
providing instruction scheduling avoids this crash
So, I am trying to beat gcc/vax into shape and incorporate changes f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91743
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85401
--- Comment #6 from coypu ---
I imagine I didn't write scheduling for the broken instruction, so it doesn't
ever happen. something silly like that, rather than it being a valid fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91744
Bug ID: 91744
Summary: -fno-pie is not honored
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91744
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey Walton ---
My bad, this should have been included:
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS
Release:18.04
$ gcc --version
gcc (Ubuntu 7.4.0-1ubuntu1~18.04.1) 7.4.0
Copyrigh
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
