[Bug fortran/94377] Won't compile when deallocating a parameterized derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94377 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug analyzer/94378] New: -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak false positive when returning a struct by value holding a heap-allocated pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94378 Bug ID: 94378 Summary: -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak false positive when returning a struct by value holding a heap-allocated pointer Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCON

[Bug fortran/94377] New: Won't compile when deallocating a parameterized derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94377 Bug ID: 94377 Summary: Won't compile when deallocating a parameterized derived type Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/94376] New: When nested inside a lambda body, [=] captures by const value instead of by value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94376 Bug ID: 94376 Summary: When nested inside a lambda body, [=] captures by const value instead of by value Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug libstdc++/93904] LWG 561 not implemented: std::inserter overly generic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93904 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug libstdc++/94354] std::reverse_iterator comparison operators defined incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94354 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug c/94338] struct member alignment is not carried over to alignment of struct variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94338 --- Comment #11 from huaixin chang --- (In reply to huaixin chang from comment #10) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9) > > Btw, > > > > struct X { > > long a __attribute__((__aligned__(128))); > > long b __attribute__((__alig

[Bug middle-end/90056] 548.exchange2_r regressions on AMD Zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90056 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor --- So replaced with more specific bugs for newer hardware: PR94373 and PR94375.

[Bug tree-optimization/94374] modification of constant scalars sometimes eliminated, sometimes not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94374 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/94374] New: modification of constant scalars sometimes eliminated, sometimes not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94374 Bug ID: 94374 Summary: modification of constant scalars sometimes eliminated, sometimes not Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/94375] New: 548.exchange2_r run time is 8-18% worse than GCC 9 at -Ofast -march=native

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94375 Bug ID: 94375 Summary: 548.exchange2_r run time is 8-18% worse than GCC 9 at -Ofast -march=native Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug libstdc++/94354] std::reverse_iterator comparison operators defined incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94354 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81a8d137c22953df2ea046466c62cd26c0dba103 commit r10-7434-g81a8d137c22953df2ea046466c62cd26c0dba103 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug target/87163] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2305

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163 Bill Seurer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/94123] [10 regression] r10-1734, SVN r273240, causes gcc.target/powerpc/pr87507.c to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94123 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug c/60846] Add 128-bit integer types for general use on 32-bit/64-bit CPUs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60846 --- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Note that supporting on any given 32-bit architecture requires making a choice of what the function-calling ABI should be for such types (and corresponding complex types) as function argume

[Bug target/94145] Longcalls mis-optimize loading the function address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94145 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19e5389debb03c3623f6a2ce8a8f6f4aa2118901 commit r10-7430-g19e5389debb03c3623f6a2ce8a8f6f4aa2118901 Author: Alan Modra Date: Wed Mar

[Bug c/60846] Add 128-bit integer types for general use on 32-bit/64-bit CPUs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60846 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- Note with __builtin_*_overflow, implementing 128bit integer (or larger) as a class for C++ should be easier now.

[Bug c++/84733] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (check_local_shadow())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/94373] 548.exchange2_r run time is 7-12% worse than GCC 9 at -O2 and generic march/mtune

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94373 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Component|t

[Bug tree-optimization/94373] New: 548.exchange2_r run time is 7-12% worse than GCC 9 at -O2 and generic march/mtune

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94373 Bug ID: 94373 Summary: 548.exchange2_r run time is 7-12% worse than GCC 9 at -O2 and generic march/mtune Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug target/94359] new test case g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94359 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- Note1 : the 32b multilib works without any error. Note2 : The dumps are gimple from symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C.020t.fixup_cfg1 which is the pass after all the coroutine-specific stuff is complete. thus, Fo

[Bug c++/90711] [9/10 Regression] Failing SFINAE from unrelated struct since r9-6794

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90711 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/94314] [10 Regression] Optimizing mismatched new/delete pairs since r10-2106-g6343b6bf3bb83c87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94314 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #5) > I don't think we need heavy machinery linking new and delete (and if we did > I'd be tempted to store it in some global table rather than in the nodes). > The most

[Bug middle-end/94339] [10 regression] ICE in tree_class_check_failed since r10-7344-gca6c722561ce9b9d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:54de5afb4a9b2f7296f614820a33ec0e4eb8bf39 commit r10-7429-g54de5afb4a9b2f7296f614820a33ec0e4eb8bf39 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Fr

[Bug target/94372] New: pthread doesn't define _REENTRANT in preprocessor on OpenRISC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94372 Bug ID: 94372 Summary: pthread doesn't define _REENTRANT in preprocessor on OpenRISC Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug analyzer/94371] New: Macro-printing within diagnostic paths can be very verbose.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94371 Bug ID: 94371 Summary: Macro-printing within diagnostic paths can be very verbose. Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c++/94155] internal compiler error: in gimplify_init_ctor_eval, at gimplify.c:4664

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94155 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Even simpler: struct S { int i, j; }; struct A { S s; constexpr A(S e) : s(e) {} }; void f() { A g[1]({{1, 1}}); }

[Bug c/60846] Add 128-bit integer types for general use on 32-bit/64-bit CPUs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60846 Bill Gray changed: What|Removed |Added CC||feliks314159 at yahoo dot com --- Comment #7

[Bug c++/94078] bogus and missing -Wmismatched-tags on an instance of a template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94078 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/93824] bogus -Wredundant-tags on a first declaration in use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93824 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 90056, which changed state. Bug 90056 Summary: 548.exchange2_r regressions on AMD Zen https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90056 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug middle-end/90056] 548.exchange2_r regressions on AMD Zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90056 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/94346] [9 Regression] ICE due to handle_copy_attribute since r9-3982

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94346 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.0 Summary|[9/10 Regression]

[Bug c++/94346] [9/10 Regression] ICE due to handle_copy_attribute since r9-3982

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94346 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52f24a9e989300506f812bacb8cc302a8bf03a06 commit r10-7428-g52f24a9e989300506f812bacb8cc302a8bf03a06 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Fri

[Bug c++/84733] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (check_local_shadow())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733 --- Comment #24 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c36b54de7ddbcb580f4b99936af4a0195db9d2f commit r8-10145-g4c36b54de7ddbcb580f4b99936af4a0195db9d2f Author: Nathan Sidwell

[Bug c++/94155] internal compiler error: in gimplify_init_ctor_eval, at gimplify.c:4664

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94155 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Reduced: template struct A { int i; T t; constexpr A(int, T e) : i(), t(e) {} }; void f() { A> g[1]({1, {1, 1}}); } We ICE because we don't satisfy: 4662 /* ??? Here's to hoping the front e

[Bug web/94351] bugzilla search is not as useful as before

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94351 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug tree-optimization/93946] Bogus redundant store removal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93946 --- Comment #11 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- RTL before sched2 does look sane and similar to that generated for x86 with -m32. I've been trying to step through sched2. I think that where things get interesting is the call to true_dependenc

[Bug c++/94326] g++: error: pack.ii: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94326 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/94339] [10 regression] ICE in tree_class_check_failed since r10-7344-gca6c722561ce9b9d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/84733] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (check_local_shadow())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733 --- Comment #23 from Nathan Sidwell --- Fixed trunk and gcc-9

[Bug c++/84733] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (check_local_shadow())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733 --- Comment #22 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:070a0b6392d682f11ca79d22ae00bc822332cdcf commit r9-8419-g070a0b6392d682f11ca79d22ae00bc822332cdcf Author: Nathan Sidwell

[Bug c++/84733] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (check_local_shadow())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733 --- Comment #21 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c7fc15f54b321b2522ae26abebb86957de5c6fae commit r10-7427-gc7fc15f54b321b2522ae26abebb86957de5c6fae Author: Nathan Sidwell Date:

[Bug web/94351] bugzilla search is not as useful as before

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94351 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug web/94349] Bugzilla user preferences are blank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94349 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/94098] [10 Regression] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types 'int(void*, void*)' and 'int(void*, void*)'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94098 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/94098] [10 Regression] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types 'int(void*, void*)' and 'int(void*, void*)'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94098 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ccacf77be5508dd5b4df59f402965196d11edb05 commit r10-7426-gccacf77be5508dd5b4df59f402965196d11edb05 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Fri

[Bug c/94370] New: double negation in diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94370 Bug ID: 94370 Summary: double negation in diagnostic Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee

[Bug c++/94255] template specialization in different namespace causes crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94255 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug c++/84733] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (check_local_shadow())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- And even r10-7425 still ICEs.

[Bug gcov-profile/94369] New: 505.mcf_r is 6-7% slower at -Ofast -march=native with PGO+LTO than with just LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94369 Bug ID: 94369 Summary: 505.mcf_r is 6-7% slower at -Ofast -march=native with PGO+LTO than with just LTO Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/84733] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (check_local_shadow())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #18) > fixed GCC 10 13dfc007557c384683118fa12cd255e69b70a34d I don't see such a commit in the repo.

[Bug libgomp/94290] [gfortran] OpenMP target teams distribute default firstprivate causes failure to map back values from device

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94290 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/91601] gcov: ICE in handle_cycle, at gcov.c:699 happen which get code coverage with lcov.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91601 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/84733] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (check_local_shadow())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733 --- Comment #18 from Nathan Sidwell --- fixed GCC 10 13dfc007557c384683118fa12cd255e69b70a34d

[Bug c/94081] -Waddress-of-packed-member doesn’t take variable attributes or __builtin_assume_aligned into account

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94081 My initial report text was apparently lost in the Bugzilla migration, so here I am submitting it again. In this code: #include struct foo { uint16_t a, b; } __attribute__((packed)); extern struct foo *f(void);

[Bug rtl-optimization/94368] New: [9/10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3074(error: could not split insn) on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94368 Bug ID: 94368 Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3074(error: could not split insn) on aarch64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1

[Bug c/63326] whether a #pragma is a statement depends on the type of pragma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63326 --- Comment #28 from Romain Geissler --- Hi David, Do you have plans to submit this patch for review when stage 1 of gcc 11 opens ? Cheers, Romain

[Bug preprocessor/94367] pragma GCC diagnostics messes up with one line "if" blocks without curly braces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94367 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/63326] whether a #pragma is a statement depends on the type of pragma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63326 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com ---

[Bug preprocessor/94367] pragma GCC diagnostics messes up with one line "if" blocks without curly braces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94367 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- pragma GCC diagnostics is a full statement.

[Bug preprocessor/94367] New: pragma GCC diagnostics messes up with one line "if" blocks without curly braces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94367 Bug ID: 94367 Summary: pragma GCC diagnostics messes up with one line "if" blocks without curly braces Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/94366] New: OpenMP Parallel Reduction with "&&" operator does not compute correct result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94366 Bug ID: 94366 Summary: OpenMP Parallel Reduction with "&&" operator does not compute correct result Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug analyzer/94365] New: false positive leak when using container_of-like constructs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94365 Bug ID: 94365 Summary: false positive leak when using container_of-like constructs Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c/93572] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: q from h referenced in main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93572 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/94364] New: 505.mcf_r is 8% faster when compiled with -mprefer-vector-width=128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94364 Bug ID: 94364 Summary: 505.mcf_r is 8% faster when compiled with -mprefer-vector-width=128 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/93573] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:733

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93573 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48135 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48135&action=edit gcc10-pr93573.patch For the error-recovery ICE, we can just make sure that after errors the type isn't assumed

[Bug c/93573] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:733

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93573 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P4 |P2

[Bug other/79469] Feature request: provide `__builtin_assume` builtin function to allow more aggressive optimizations and to match clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79469 felix changed: What|Removed |Added CC||felix.von.s at posteo dot de --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c/94363] New: possible typo: attribute attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94363 Bug ID: 94363 Summary: possible typo: attribute attribute Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Ass

[Bug target/94359] new test case g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94359 --- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe --- it is not mandatory (for C++20 compliance) that the implementation provides symmetric transfer - so it could be switched off - or XFAILed. However, users state that an impl. that can't do the symmetric transf

[Bug target/94359] new test case g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94359 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-03-27 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/94356] Missed optimisation: useless multiplication generated for pointer comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94356 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- I tried https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2017-May/475037.html some time ago. Having a different type for the multiplication and the offsetting introduced a lot of NOPs and caused a few regressions (fro

[Bug ipa/94360] 6% run-time regression of 502.gcc_r against GCC 9 when compiled with -O2 and both PGO and LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94360 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Unfortunately, the mentioned configuration is not tested on LNT periodic benchmarks.

[Bug analyzer/94362] New: False analyzer report due to i >= 0 and i < 0 on openssl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94362 Bug ID: 94362 Summary: False analyzer report due to i >= 0 and i < 0 on openssl Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug fortran/94361] New: Memory leak in nested types with final

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94361 Bug ID: 94361 Summary: Memory leak in nested types with final Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c/93573] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:733

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93573 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug ipa/94360] New: 6% run-time regression of 502.gcc_r against GCC 9 when compiled with -O2 and both PGO and LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94360 Bug ID: 94360 Summary: 6% run-time regression of 502.gcc_r against GCC 9 when compiled with -O2 and both PGO and LTO Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/94359] New: new test case g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94359 Bug ID: 94359 Summary: new test case g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic. C fails Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/86715] ICE passing too large argument on stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86715 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug middle-end/93786] [8/9/10 Regression] gimplifier ICE with statement expression since r8-5526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48133 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48133&action=edit gcc10-pr93786.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c++/94078] bogus and missing -Wmismatched-tags on an instance of a template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94078 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04dd734b52de121853e1ea6b3c197a598b294e23 commit r10-7424-g04dd734b52de121853e1ea6b3c197a598b294e23 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Fri

[Bug c++/93824] bogus -Wredundant-tags on a first declaration in use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93824 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04dd734b52de121853e1ea6b3c197a598b294e23 commit r10-7424-g04dd734b52de121853e1ea6b3c197a598b294e23 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Fri

[Bug c++/93810] missing -Wmismatched-tags and -Wredundant-tags on a typedef of an implicit class template specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93810 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04dd734b52de121853e1ea6b3c197a598b294e23 commit r10-7424-g04dd734b52de121853e1ea6b3c197a598b294e23 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Fri

[gnu.org #1509189] [wwwdocs] https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/git.html gives internal server error

Hello GCC maintainers, The same sort of error was reported by Jake Vossen on January 17 (gnu.org #1465799): "On the home page of gcc (https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/) if you click on 'Git' on the right hand side it takes you to https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/git.html, which is giving me an i

[Bug analyzer/94350] internal compiler error: in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4874

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94350 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

Support More Than 10452 Families All Over Lebanon

Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser | Share it You are seeing this Email in Plain Text Version; Switch to HTML or Click this link http://dits.ws/a/44654 to View it properly. http://www.spx-em.com/url/u8nGvLduh5R6hJJpe5rKzMl6pqrCvMO1tKW7vcfOgLu2sHmFm7e6aXuawsO-tbKumMLDs8CtuMJ

[Bug analyzer/94350] internal compiler error: in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4874

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94350 --- Comment #7 from Stephen Hemminger --- Verbose make output shows compiler flags gcc -Wp,-MD,./.eal_memalloc.o.d.tmp -m64 -pthread -I/home/shemminger/DPDK/upstream/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/include -march=native -DRTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSE -DRT

[Bug analyzer/94350] internal compiler error: in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4874

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94350 --- Comment #6 from Stephen Hemminger --- $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 10.0.1 20200311 (Red Hat 10.0.1-0.9)

[Bug fortran/94030] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE equivalence of an integer and an element of an array of size n

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94030 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug analyzer/94350] internal compiler error: in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4874

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94350 --- Comment #5 from Stephen Hemminger --- Created attachment 48132 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48132&action=edit Preprocessed version of source code

[Bug tree-optimization/94356] Missed optimisation: useless multiplication generated for pointer comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94356 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/94257] ICE in inline nested namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94257 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/94257] ICE in inline nested namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94257 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9dba60130dc3ebf7cce8716a36672281688693f7 commit r10-7423-g9dba60130dc3ebf7cce8716a36672281688693f7 Author: Nathan Sidwell Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/94329] [8/9/10 Regression] error: use_only.f90: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94329 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug tree-optimization/94329] [8/9/10 Regression] error: use_only.f90: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94329 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|debug

[Bug tree-optimization/94356] Missed optimisation: useless multiplication generated for pointer comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94356 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- That's because internally we use an unsigned type for offsets (including for the multiplication). There have been tries to change that...

[Bug fortran/94358] [OMP] Privatize internal array variables introduced by the Fortran FE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94358 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge --- To help with OpenACC 'kernels' support, Gergő later submitted for og8 an additional change in "Rework OpenACC Fortran DO loop in

[Bug fortran/94358] [OMP] Privatize internal array variables introduced by the Fortran FE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94358 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org La

[Bug fortran/94358] New: [OMP] Privatize internal array variables introduced by the Fortran FE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94358 Bug ID: 94358 Summary: [OMP] Privatize internal array variables introduced by the Fortran FE Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openacc

  1   2   >