https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63326
--- Comment #28 from Romain Geissler ---
Hi David,
Do you have plans to submit this patch for review when stage 1 of gcc 11 opens
?
Cheers,
Romain
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94368
Bug ID: 94368
Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at
final.c:3074(error: could not split insn) on
aarch64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94081
My initial report text was apparently lost in the Bugzilla migration, so here I
am submitting it again.
In this code:
#include
struct foo {
uint16_t a, b;
} __attribute__((packed));
extern struct foo *f(void);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733
--- Comment #18 from Nathan Sidwell ---
fixed GCC 10 13dfc007557c384683118fa12cd255e69b70a34d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91601
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94290
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #18)
> fixed GCC 10 13dfc007557c384683118fa12cd255e69b70a34d
I don't see such a commit in the repo.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94369
Bug ID: 94369
Summary: 505.mcf_r is 6-7% slower at -Ofast -march=native with
PGO+LTO than with just LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And even r10-7425 still ICEs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94255
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94370
Bug ID: 94370
Summary: double negation in diagnostic
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94098
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ccacf77be5508dd5b4df59f402965196d11edb05
commit r10-7426-gccacf77be5508dd5b4df59f402965196d11edb05
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94098
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94349
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94351
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c7fc15f54b321b2522ae26abebb86957de5c6fae
commit r10-7427-gc7fc15f54b321b2522ae26abebb86957de5c6fae
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:070a0b6392d682f11ca79d22ae00bc822332cdcf
commit r9-8419-g070a0b6392d682f11ca79d22ae00bc822332cdcf
Author: Nathan Sidwell
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733
--- Comment #23 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Fixed trunk and gcc-9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93946
--- Comment #11 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
RTL before sched2 does look sane and similar to that generated for x86 with
-m32.
I've been trying to step through sched2. I think that where things get
interesting is the call to true_dependenc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94326
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94351
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94155
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Reduced:
template struct A {
int i;
T t;
constexpr A(int, T e) : i(), t(e) {}
};
void
f()
{
A> g[1]({1, {1, 1}});
}
We ICE because we don't satisfy:
4662 /* ??? Here's to hoping the front e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733
--- Comment #24 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c36b54de7ddbcb580f4b99936af4a0195db9d2f
commit r8-10145-g4c36b54de7ddbcb580f4b99936af4a0195db9d2f
Author: Nathan Sidwell
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94346
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52f24a9e989300506f812bacb8cc302a8bf03a06
commit r10-7428-g52f24a9e989300506f812bacb8cc302a8bf03a06
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94346
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Summary|[9/10 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 90056, which changed state.
Bug 90056 Summary: 548.exchange2_r regressions on AMD Zen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90056
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90056
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93824
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94078
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60846
Bill Gray changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||feliks314159 at yahoo dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94155
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Even simpler:
struct S { int i, j; };
struct A {
S s;
constexpr A(S e) : s(e) {}
};
void
f()
{
A g[1]({{1, 1}});
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94371
Bug ID: 94371
Summary: Macro-printing within diagnostic paths can be very
verbose.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94372
Bug ID: 94372
Summary: pthread doesn't define _REENTRANT in preprocessor on
OpenRISC
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:54de5afb4a9b2f7296f614820a33ec0e4eb8bf39
commit r10-7429-g54de5afb4a9b2f7296f614820a33ec0e4eb8bf39
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94314
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #5)
> I don't think we need heavy machinery linking new and delete (and if we did
> I'd be tempted to store it in some global table rather than in the nodes).
> The most
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90711
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94359
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
Note1 : the 32b multilib works without any error.
Note2 : The dumps are gimple from symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C.020t.fixup_cfg1
which is the pass after all the coroutine-specific stuff is complete.
thus, Fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94373
Bug ID: 94373
Summary: 548.exchange2_r run time is 7-12% worse than GCC 9 at
-O2 and generic march/mtune
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94373
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Component|t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60846
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note with __builtin_*_overflow, implementing 128bit integer (or larger) as a
class for C++ should be easier now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94145
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19e5389debb03c3623f6a2ce8a8f6f4aa2118901
commit r10-7430-g19e5389debb03c3623f6a2ce8a8f6f4aa2118901
Author: Alan Modra
Date: Wed Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60846
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Note that supporting on any given 32-bit architecture requires making a
choice of what the function-calling ABI should be for such types (and
corresponding complex types) as function argume
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94123
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94354
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81a8d137c22953df2ea046466c62cd26c0dba103
commit r10-7434-g81a8d137c22953df2ea046466c62cd26c0dba103
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94375
Bug ID: 94375
Summary: 548.exchange2_r run time is 8-18% worse than GCC 9 at
-Ofast -march=native
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94374
Bug ID: 94374
Summary: modification of constant scalars sometimes eliminated,
sometimes not
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94374
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90056
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
So replaced with more specific bugs for newer hardware: PR94373 and PR94375.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94338
--- Comment #11 from huaixin chang ---
(In reply to huaixin chang from comment #10)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> > Btw,
> >
> > struct X {
> > long a __attribute__((__aligned__(128)));
> > long b __attribute__((__alig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94354
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93904
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94376
Bug ID: 94376
Summary: When nested inside a lambda body, [=] captures by
const value instead of by value
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94377
Bug ID: 94377
Summary: Won't compile when deallocating a parameterized
derived type
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94378
Bug ID: 94378
Summary: -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak false positive when returning a
struct by value holding a heap-allocated pointer
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94377
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
101 - 158 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
