[Bug ipa/96252] [10/11 Regression] mis-optimization where identical functions have very different codegen since gcc 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96252 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|mis-optimization where |[10/11 Regression] |i

[Bug ipa/96252] mis-optimization where identical functions have very different codegen since gcc 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96252 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- It's IPA ICF that makes the difference. Guess the "thunk" isn't a thunk but copies parameters by value (fails to tail-call?).

[Bug fortran/96255] [F2018] Implement optional type spec for index in DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #2) > This issue depends on the fix for FORALL. In gfc_match_do in the concurrent > section, one gets to > > m = match_forall_header (&head, &mask); > > to

[Bug fortran/96255] [F2018] Implement optional type spec for index in DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||78219 Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/96255] [F2018] Implement optional type spec for index in DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug rtl-optimization/89310] Poor code generation returning float field from a struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89310 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Xiong Hu Luo : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ef4cf87a7c7f36c1fe523e4d71bbb4846ab0c35 commit r11-2245-g2ef4cf87a7c7f36c1fe523e4d71bbb4846ab0c35 Author: Xionghu Luo Date: Mon J

[Bug c++/96258] New: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in cp_parser_declaration)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96258 Bug ID: 96258 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in cp_parser_declaration) Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invali

[Bug c++/96257] New: [11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_skip_to_pragma_eol, at cp/parser.c:3948

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96257 Bug ID: 96257 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_skip_to_pragma_eol, at cp/parser.c:3948 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-

[Bug c++/96256] New: Invalid consteval call not rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96256 Bug ID: 96256 Summary: Invalid consteval call not rejected Product: gcc Version: 11.0 URL: https://godbolt.org/z/zeEY96 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invalid

[Bug fortran/96255] New: [F2018] Implement option type spec for index DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255 Bug ID: 96255 Summary: [F2018] Implement option type spec for index DO CONCURRENT Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug fortran/92643] ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 failure on i586-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92643 --- Comment #13 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to jvdelisle from comment #12) > (In reply to kargl from comment #11) > > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10) > > > > As of svn reversion r280157, the issue is not fixed.

[Bug fortran/92643] ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 failure on i586-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92643 jvdelisle at charter dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at charter dot ne

[Bug libfortran/93567] G edit descriptor uses E instead of F editing in rounding mode UP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567 jvdelisle at charter dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at charter dot ne

[Bug libfortran/93567] G edit descriptor uses E instead of F editing in rounding mode UP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Test case --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/round_3.f08 2020-06-13 03:11:54.0 +0200 +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/round_3.f08 2020-07-21 01:14:56.0 +0200 @@ -110,6 +110

[Bug libfortran/93567] G edit descriptor uses E instead of F editing in rounding mode UP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The patch in comment 3 broke gfortran.dg/round_3.f08. The following should work --- ../_clean/libgfortran/io/write_float.def2020-06-13 03:11:55.0 +0200 +++ libgfortran/io/write_float.def

[Bug d/96254] New: d: ICE using non-local variable: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96254 Bug ID: 96254 Summary: d: ICE using non-local variable: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug target/96190] --enable-default-pie on sparc uses crtbeginS.o (correct) and crtend.o (incorrect)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96190 --- Comment #3 from Sergei Trofimovich --- As suggested by Eric I plan to apply sparc fix from master into gcc-10 branch after 10.2 release cut.

[Bug c/96253] decimal floating point missing on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96253 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- DFP is not supported for either AArch32 or AArch64; nor do the respective ABI documents say what the ABI would be for it (though a GCC patch for the AArch64 case was submitted in

[Bug c/96253] New: decimal floating point missing on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96253 Bug ID: 96253 Summary: decimal floating point missing on ARM Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug libfortran/94586] trigd_lib.inc:84:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'fmaf'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94586 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #48357|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/96190] --enable-default-pie on sparc uses crtbeginS.o (correct) and crtend.o (incorrect)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96190 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sergei Trofimovich : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87891d5eafe8d1de90b9d9b056eca81c508d1c77 commit r11-2235-g87891d5eafe8d1de90b9d9b056eca81c508d1c77 Author: Sergei Trofimovich

[Bug tree-optimization/96245] Failure to optimize arithmetic pattern in switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96245 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Only (1) would be true. Like the optimization, the warning wouldn't trigger in code that didn't follow the pattern because there's no way to tell if that's deliberate or a bug. I'd expect the warning to be u

[Bug debug/47819] [meta-bug] LTO debug information issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47819 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||88389, 88878, 93117, 91794,

[Bug fortran/93553] ICE in scan_omp_1_op, at omp-low.c:3485

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93553 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus --- Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-July/550317.html

[Bug c++/95700] read-md.c: "missing sentinel in function call" when building gcc with musl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95700 --- Comment #15 from vvinayag at arm dot com --- (In reply to Ilya Leoshkevich from comment #14) > gcc113 has 4.8.4, which is a bit newer. But in any case, according to > https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html, gcc should support nullptr > s

[Bug target/95750] [x86] Use dummy atomic insn instead of mfence in __atomic_thread_fence(seq_cst)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95750 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c5e83d5b32c31b11cf1684bf5d1ab3e7174685c commit r11-2232-g3c5e83d5b32c31b11cf1684bf5d1ab3e7174685c Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Mon J

[Bug middle-end/95886] suboptimal memcpy with embedded zero bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95886 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/95189] [10 Regression] memcmp being wrongly stripped like strcmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95189 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] memcmp |[10 Regression] memcmp

[Bug middle-end/95189] [10/11 Regression] memcmp being wrongly stripped like strcmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95189 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d5803b9876b3d11c93d1a10fabb3fbb1c4a14bd6 commit r11-2231-gd5803b9876b3d11c93d1a10fabb3fbb1c4a14bd6 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Mon

[Bug middle-end/95886] suboptimal memcpy with embedded zero bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95886 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d5803b9876b3d11c93d1a10fabb3fbb1c4a14bd6 commit r11-2231-gd5803b9876b3d11c93d1a10fabb3fbb1c4a14bd6 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Mon

[Bug c/96249] The string " bytes" is repeated at the end of the message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96249 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b0c5a642ce4e0d292706ac2139fc14785938f23e commit r11-2229-gb0c5a642ce4e0d292706ac2139fc14785938f23e Author: Martin Sebor Date: Mon

[Bug c/96249] The string " bytes" is repeated at the end of the message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96249 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/96252] mis-optimization where identical functions have very different codegen since gcc 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96252 --- Comment #1 from Will Wray --- Here's the code, compiler invocation and codegen output. The longer codegen expands memcpy to copy the std::array by-value arguments. -fno-inline shows the compiler call the first function from the second, then

[Bug fortran/92643] ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 failure on i586-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92643 --- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10) > > As of svn reversion r280157, the issue is not fixed. > > Do you know the git equivalent? No. I don't use git. r280157 is the last svn rev

[Bug fortran/92643] ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 failure on i586-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92643 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > As of svn reversion r280157, the issue is not fixed. Do you know the git equivalent?

[Bug libfortran/93567] G edit descriptor uses E instead of F editing in rounding mode UP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- With --- ../_clean/libgfortran/io/write_float.def2020-06-13 03:11:55.0 +0200 +++ libgfortran/io/write_float.def 2020-07-20 18:17:41.0 +0200 @@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ determine_en_pr

[Bug ipa/96235] Segmentation fault with "-Og -fno-dce -fno-tree-dce -finline-small-functions -fipa-sra"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96235 Joseph C. Sible changed: What|Removed |Added CC||josephcsible at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug fortran/92643] ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 failure on i586-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92643 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #9 from kargl

[Bug tree-optimization/96245] Failure to optimize arithmetic pattern in switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96245 Joseph C. Sible changed: What|Removed |Added CC||josephcsible at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug jit/69435] Truncated lines in jit.log

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69435 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/96242] ICE conditionally noexcept defaulted comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96242 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-20 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug jit/69435] Truncated lines in jit.log

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69435 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alex Coplan : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8764e9a3fc43f1117db77d1f056b6c3f15a29db3 commit r11-2228-g8764e9a3fc43f1117db77d1f056b6c3f15a29db3 Author: Alex Coplan Date: Mon Ju

[Bug tree-optimization/96245] Failure to optimize arithmetic pattern in switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96245 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug lto/58528] lto1: internal compiler error: in build_abbrev_table, at dwarf2out.c:7478

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58528 --- Comment #11 from Charles --- This is a very old bug against a very old compiler. I no longer have access to the code that triggered the issue. I would say to go ahead and close it. An awful lot of changes have been made to lto since the ICE w

[Bug c++/96252] New: mis-optimization where identical functions have very different codegen since gcc 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96252 Bug ID: 96252 Summary: mis-optimization where identical functions have very different codegen since gcc 10 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug c++/96251] co_yield incorrectly rejected in non-explicitly-constexpr generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96251 --- Comment #2 from Yuri Kilochek --- Created attachment 48900 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48900&action=edit stderr.txt

[Bug c++/96251] co_yield incorrectly rejected in non-explicitly-constexpr generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96251 --- Comment #1 from Yuri Kilochek --- Created attachment 48899 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48899&action=edit source

[Bug c++/96251] New: co_yield incorrectly rejected in non-explicitly-constexpr generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96251 Bug ID: 96251 Summary: co_yield incorrectly rejected in non-explicitly-constexpr generic lambda Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug fortran/93336] BIND(C) and CHARACTER arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93336 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-20 Status|UNC

[Bug target/95237] LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT shrinks alignment, FAIL gcc.target/i386/pr69454-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237 --- Comment #20 from David Binderman --- This bug has prevented the successful compilation of the local Linux kernel for just over a month now. If I can assist with any testing, please let me know.

[Bug rtl-optimization/96031] suboptimal codegen for store low 16-bits value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96031 --- Comment #3 from zhongyunde at tom dot com --- I find there is some different between the two cases during in ivopts. For the 2nd case, a UINT32 type iv sum is choosed [local count: 955630224]: # sum_15 = PHI <0(5), sum_9(6)> # ivtm

[Bug d/96250] New: d: Field access in parentheses causes error: need 'this' for 'field' of type 'type'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96250 Bug ID: 96250 Summary: d: Field access in parentheses causes error: need 'this' for 'field' of type 'type' Product: gcc Version: 10.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug c/96249] New: The string " bytes" is repeated at the end of the message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96249 Bug ID: 96249 Summary: The string " bytes" is repeated at the end of the message Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug libfortran/91543] [10/11 Regression] nf failure ( Handling stack overflow more sensibly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91543 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-20 Status|UNC

[Bug driver/96248] New: Closing quote in wrong position in config/rs6000/linux64.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96248 Bug ID: 96248 Summary: Closing quote in wrong position in config/rs6000/linux64.h Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug fortran/94931] request: print include path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94931 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Severity|normal

[Bug fortran/93289] array constructor of different length: Missing diagnostic when PARAMETER is in list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93289 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/92643] ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 failure on i586-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92643 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-20 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libfortran/94586] trigd_lib.inc:84:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'fmaf'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94586 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-20 Priority|P3

[Bug libfortran/93567] G edit descriptor uses E instead of F editing in rounding mode UP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/94958] gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:9797: possible typo ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94958 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/93592] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with EN descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle2 at outlook dot com T

[Bug c++/95700] read-md.c: "missing sentinel in function call" when building gcc with musl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95700 --- Comment #14 from Ilya Leoshkevich --- gcc113 has 4.8.4, which is a bit newer. But in any case, according to https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html, gcc should support nullptr since 4.6. Could you please post the failing compiler invoca

[Bug target/95750] [x86] Use dummy atomic insn instead of mfence in __atomic_thread_fence(seq_cst)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95750 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #48756|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/96053] Miss optimization:Finding SLP sequences from reductions sometimes is better than finding from reduction chains

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96053 --- Comment #4 from Kaipeng Zhou --- This patch add #pragma GCC no_reduc_chain and only completes the front end of C language. For the testcase, it successfully skipped doing slp by finding sequences from reduction chains. Without #pragma GCC n

[Bug tree-optimization/96053] Miss optimization:Finding SLP sequences from reductions sometimes is better than finding from reduction chains

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96053 --- Comment #3 from Kaipeng Zhou --- Created attachment 48896 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48896&action=edit Patch to add #pragma GCC no_reduc_chain

[Bug target/96247] -falign-functions=0 works wrongly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96247 --- Comment #2 from hujp --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > not sure if that's sensible or if instead zero should be rejected. Note > x86_64 behaves the same so it's probably better to adjust the documentation > to reflect the im

[Bug libstdc++/93121] std::bit_cast missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93121 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e4f1cbc35b1e823a0a6e58eeca61c8c6ca351875 commit r11-2225-ge4f1cbc35b1e823a0a6e58eeca61c8c6ca351875 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Mo

[Bug libstdc++/93121] std::bit_cast missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93121 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83b171655dc0785262a444f5d5c2be7195977987 commit r11-2224-g83b171655dc0785262a444f5d5c2be7195977987 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Mo

[Bug target/96246] [AVX512] unefficient code generatation for vpblendm*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96246 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > With -mavx2 it works: > > vpcmpgtd%ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0 > vpblendvb %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm3, %ymm0 > > not sure how _load comes into play

[Bug testsuite/95720] [11 Regression] New dump output filename strategy invalidates tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 --- Comment #13 from Andrea Corallo --- "aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720 > > Alexandre Oliva changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug tree-optimization/96244] Redudant mask load generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96244 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > so range-info is one index too pessimistic here. So IMHO it's not about > "redundant" masked loads, it's about the fact that we end up with loads > at all here.

[Bug target/96246] [AVX512] unefficient code generatation for vpblendm*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96246 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/96247] -falign-functions=0 works wrongly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96247 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |11.0 Keywords|

[Bug ipa/96235] Segmentation fault with "-Og -fno-dce -fno-tree-dce -finline-small-functions -fipa-sra"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96235 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- I cannot reproduce this.

[Bug tree-optimization/96234] Sub-optimal register allocation with a signed integer literal.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96234 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/96245] Failure to optimize arithmetic pattern in switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96245 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-20 CC|