https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on| |78219
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This issue depends on the fix for FORALL. In gfc_match_do in the concurrent
section, one gets to
m = match_forall_header (&head, &mask);
to match the control portion of the statement.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78219
[Bug 78219] [F08] specifying the kind of a FORALL index in the header
