https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88473
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88798
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88808
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu ---
Fixed in GCC11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91085
--- Comment #12 from Bruce Korb ---
I'll put it on my to-do list, but I might be participating in a fire evacuation
tonight or tomorrow and I haven't built GCC in several years now. I'm going to
guess that you have to not do the substitution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88808
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:388cb292a94f98a276548cd6ce01285cf36d17df
commit r11-2796-g388cb292a94f98a276548cd6ce01285cf36d17df
Author: liuhongt
Date: Thu Aug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71453
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:00cb3494cab397b5655ab42fd69310883c12137c
commit r11-2793-g00cb3494cab397b5655ab42fd69310883c12137c
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue Sep 3
ported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 11.0.0 20200820 (experimental) [master revision
:01cb32abf:04e23a4051fb3c049f85b9e6e2fc58f937337aff] (GCC)
c version 11.0.0 20200820 (experimental) [master revision
:01cb32abf:04e23a4051fb3c049f85b9e6e2fc58f937337aff] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -g -O2 t.c
$
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95152
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95152
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b31b6b52612a6d4a7a84e71f6331464d68400d4
commit r11-2792-g6b31b6b52612a6d4a7a84e71f6331464d68400d4
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95352
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:15:27PM +, jrfsousa at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95352
>
> --- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
> I have tested the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96250
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf465206b7012a9049821c68236093969d7767da
commit r10-8650-gbf465206b7012a9049821c68236093969d7767da
Author: Iain Buclaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919
--- Comment #31 from Marietto ---
they don't reply to messages and they don't fix old bugs. And new users aren't
interested to use xen anymore. So,it's a waste of time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919
--- Comment #30 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Marietto from comment #28)
> I'm not a coder. can u explain to me carefully what should I do ? thanks.
Usually packages provide a mechanism to prevent compiler warnings from causing
errors (by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919
--- Comment #29 from Marietto ---
I get this error :
gcc -m64 -DBUILD_ID -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-unused-but-set-variable
-Wno-unused-local-typedefs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95352
--- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
I have tested the patch posted by Steve Kargl and it seems to do the trick.
Can I do anything to get this going?
Best regards,
José Rui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96250
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96254
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96250
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee11a23b334d5fea08b80c2d87874388ed51d08e
commit r10-8649-gee11a23b334d5fea08b80c2d87874388ed51d08e
Author: Iain Buclaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96254
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a5d07caca15958980ae9cc4570a784f8b1a43403
commit r10-8647-ga5d07caca15958980ae9cc4570a784f8b1a43403
Author: Iain Buclaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919
--- Comment #28 from Marietto ---
I'm not a coder. can u explain to me carefully what should I do ? thanks.
Il giorno gio 20 ago 2020 alle ore 16:40 msebor at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> ha scritto:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93994
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77303
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96723
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96723
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:00cb0f5840795698557731c6e549a5ce99573223
commit r11-2789-g00cb0f5840795698557731c6e549a5ce99573223
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93529
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96612
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87711
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96612
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7ffcf5d61174dda1f39a623e15f7e5d6b98bbafc
commit r11-2787-g7ffcf5d61174dda1f39a623e15f7e5d6b98bbafc
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71960
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96613
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Huxhorn ---
I compiled the latest git GCC and rerun the program, no more problems.
Thank you all :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96728
Bug ID: 96728
Summary: Fatal Error: Reading module inquiry functions on
assumed-rank
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96727
Bug ID: 96727
Summary: ICE with character length specified using
specification function on assumed-rank array
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96723
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96726
Bug ID: 96726
Summary: ICE with user defined specification function on
assumed-rank array
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90367
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 90367, which changed state.
Bug 90367 Summary: Spurious warning array subscript is above array bounds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90367
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320
--- Comment #24 from Damian Rouson ---
This appears to be another example of an issue with a module procedure defined
in the same module as its interface body. In this case, the compiler doesn't
recognize a reference to the procedure:
± cat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96100
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:300ef2fcc10e98359d14654be23bbb84a5d141e1
commit r11-2785-g300ef2fcc10e98359d14654be23bbb84a5d141e1
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96101
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:300ef2fcc10e98359d14654be23bbb84a5d141e1
commit r11-2785-g300ef2fcc10e98359d14654be23bbb84a5d141e1
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92539
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10/11 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92828
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 92828, which changed state.
Bug 92828 Summary: array out of bounds access in libcpp/mkdeps.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92828
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96723
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96725
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96711
--- Comment #13 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 03:54:44PM +, bre08 at eggen dot co.uk wrote:
>
> PS (and maybe I need to post this separately as a suggestion) - will
> there be a fast "octuple-precision floating point /
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96725
Bug ID: 96725
Summary: warn for uses of global nonconstant unterminated char
arrays where strings are required
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93665
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 95667, which changed state.
Bug 95667 Summary: [11 Regression] unintended warning for memset writing across
multiple members
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95667
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95667
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96724
Bug ID: 96724
Summary: Bogus warnings with the repeat intrinsic and the flag
-Wconversion-extra
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93671
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96711
--- Comment #12 from B Eggen ---
Thanks for your explanations, and for reminding me of the excellent library etc
by David Bailey. My original quest was to have a fast method to decide for
large integers quickly whether they are perfect squares.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94958
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #6 from Andre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94958
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05814dde7024a8fa05a735cafcda72b5eb5ec0c0
commit r11-2783-g05814dde7024a8fa05a735cafcda72b5eb5ec0c0
Author: Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96718
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|[11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96711
--- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 01:47:58PM +, bre08 at eggen dot co.uk wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96711
>
> --- Comment #10 from B Eggen ---
> I've been experimenting with the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96683
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Joe Ramsay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91d206adfe39ce063f6a5731b92a03c05e82e94a
commit r11-2782-g91d206adfe39ce063f6a5731b92a03c05e82e94a
Author: Joe Ramsay
Date: Wed Aug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96720
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919
--- Comment #27 from Martin Sebor ---
The fix was applied to GCC 10 but not to GCC 9 or 8. It will not be backported
there. It can be suppressed by introducing a named temporary copy of the
pointer and using it as one other other argument to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94531
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #0)
> I've noticed that gcc.target/arm/its.c fails when targetting
> cortex-m3 or m33, but that's probably true with all cortex-m versions.
>
Since I have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96722
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96711
--- Comment #10 from B Eggen ---
I've been experimenting with the suggested work-around
m = anint(y)
This works for larger numbers, even in quad precision, however, it breaks down
a long way before the integer*16 range is exhausted, consider
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96427
--- Comment #6 from zhongyunde at tom dot com ---
Created attachment 49087
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49087=edit
adjust the alignment according the attibute
If user don't specify the alignment, so we can do some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96680
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
Some regression hunting:
* Fails with r11-652-g79ea774f9a9d36d986152d93f9eae4a9ba36b37b
* Works on OG10 = devel/omp/gcc-10 and presumably GCC 10.
My bet is that the following commit causes the issue, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919
--- Comment #26 from Marietto ---
I'm using ubuntu 20.04 and gcc 9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919
Marietto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marietto2008 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96479
--- Comment #6 from qiaopeixin at huawei dot com ---
Fix on
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=a5a635fc4331b6d5f1a1e688e1153abd2ff194a5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96479
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96633
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #2)
> Martin added me to CC so I assume he wants me to chime in.
Yes, you understood very well and thanks for the reply.
...
> With that out of the way:
ux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r11-2779-20200820091258-g1763ec9b20c-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 11.0.0 20200820 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96721
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
build_trivial_dtor_call has:
if (INDIRECT_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (instance)))
{
if (VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (instance
goto no_clobber;
instance = cp_build_fold_indirect_ref
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96721
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96721
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
More reduced testcase:
typedef int *T;
int
main ()
{
T a = nullptr;
a.~T ();
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96722
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96717
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I've moved the #c3 issues into PR96721 and PR96722 as they are separate. And
either this bug turns a dup of the former, or not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96722
Bug ID: 96722
Summary: [8/9/10/11 Regression] Clobbers on NULL since r8-1519
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs-bisection, needs-reduction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96722
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96721
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96721
Bug ID: 96721
Summary: [11 Regression] pseudo-destructor calls on pointers
since r11-2238
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96717
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96717
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> Created attachment 49085 [details]
> Preprocessed source for a.cc
This was prepared on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Compile it with -O2 to see the ud2 insn in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96717
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 49085
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49085=edit
Preprocessed source for a.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96716
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Slightly further reduced:
struct string_view
{
constexpr string_view(const char* p) : p(p) { }
const char* p;
};
struct Foo {
constexpr string_view getfoo() const {
return {};
}
private:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96716
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96436
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96719
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96436
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2a0fd7c8ff426cc40ec678efef85e4a376ea4b5
commit r11-2777-gc2a0fd7c8ff426cc40ec678efef85e4a376ea4b5
Author: Mark Eggleston
Date:
89 matches
Mail list logo
