https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97022
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97020
--- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina ---
I can confirm this fixes the regressions too.
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97030
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0)
> ATM, we have the following in the nvptx.c source code:
> ...
> #define WORKAROUND_PTXJIT_BUG 1
> #define WORKAROUND_PTXJIT_BUG_2 1
> #define WORKAROUND_PTXJIT_BUG_3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97042
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
Yes, reverting 5d3ae76af13 cures this PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97042
Bug ID: 97042
Summary: powerpc64 UINT_MAX constant
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89219
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97022
--- Comment #1 from George R. Goffe ---
Thanks for the info.
This bug report can be closed now.
Again, THANKS,
George...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97041
Bug ID: 97041
Summary: ICE during RTL pass: sched_fusion: in operator[], at
vec.h:880
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97034
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97025
--- Comment #5 from Mikhail Kremniov ---
I see. So this is not considered a bug then?
P.S. it seems that -faligned-new=8 can be used as a workaround in this case,
even in pre-c++17 modes, so the issue doesn't look that bad in the end.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97036
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983
--- Comment #21 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #19 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #14)
>> > --- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
>> > This may
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90903
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch for MVBITS:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-September/055071.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97037
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89219
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97037
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91412
Tom Honermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at honermann dot net
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97040
Bug ID: 97040
Summary: incorrect fused multiply add/subtract instruction
generated from C code
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97039
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97031
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 08:02:01AM +, jean-pierre.flam...@univ-lille.fr
wrote:
>
> I just noticed that cpp recognizes the extensions .fpp .F and other uppercase
> extensions.
> This is why I added -cpp in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97039
Bug ID: 97039
Summary: -fbounds-check misses violation with slice of array
but not an element
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82943
paul.luck...@rwth-aachen.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.luck...@rwth-aachen.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97038
Bug ID: 97038
Summary: [[no_unique_address]] support anonymous unions
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97031
--- Comment #2 from jean-pierre.flam...@univ-lille.fr ---
Thanks,
However, if I launch "man cpp" or "man gfortran" I can't see anything in
relation with my problem and traditional.
I just noticed that cpp recognizes the extensions .fpp .F and o
23 matches
Mail list logo