[Bug c++/97022] -Werror flag aborts compilation of "current" git pull on main

2020-09-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97022 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/97020] [11 regression] new SVE failures after g:47ddf4c7b1d4471cb9534f27844ab5e4279c2168

2020-09-13 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97020 --- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina --- I can confirm this fixes the regressions too. Thanks!

[Bug target/97030] [nvptx] Need strategy for nvidia JIT bug workarounds

2020-09-13 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97030 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0) > ATM, we have the following in the nvptx.c source code: > ... > #define WORKAROUND_PTXJIT_BUG 1 > #define WORKAROUND_PTXJIT_BUG_2 1 > #define WORKAROUND_PTXJIT_BUG_3

[Bug target/97042] powerpc64 UINT_MAX constant

2020-09-13 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97042 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- Yes, reverting 5d3ae76af13 cures this PR.

[Bug target/97042] New: powerpc64 UINT_MAX constant

2020-09-13 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97042 Bug ID: 97042 Summary: powerpc64 UINT_MAX constant Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assig

[Bug fortran/89219] ICE with derived type I/O

2020-09-13 Thread jvdelisle at charter dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89219 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at charter dot net --- Comment

[Bug c++/97022] -Werror flag aborts compilation of "current" git pull on main

2020-09-13 Thread grgoffe at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97022 --- Comment #1 from George R. Goffe --- Thanks for the info. This bug report can be closed now. Again, THANKS, George...

[Bug rtl-optimization/97041] New: ICE during RTL pass: sched_fusion: in operator[], at vec.h:880

2020-09-13 Thread vvinayag at arm dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97041 Bug ID: 97041 Summary: ICE during RTL pass: sched_fusion: in operator[], at vec.h:880 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/97034] [11 Regression] ICE on C++20 code: gcc_assert failure in return type deduction (gcc/cp/pt.c:26984 in type_dependent_expression_p(tree_node*))

2020-09-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97034 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/97025] In -m32 mode the alignment of pointers returned by malloc or operator new is less than alignof(std::max_align_t)

2020-09-13 Thread officesamurai at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97025 --- Comment #5 from Mikhail Kremniov --- I see. So this is not considered a bug then? P.S. it seems that -faligned-new=8 can be used as a workaround in this case, even in pre-c++17 modes, so the issue doesn't look that bad in the end.

[Bug fortran/97036] [F2018] ELEMENTAL RECURSIVE subprogram prefix combination rejected

2020-09-13 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97036 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/96983] [11 regression] ICE compiling gfortran.dg/pr96711.f90 starting with r11-3042

2020-09-13 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983 --- Comment #21 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #19 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #14) >> > --- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- >> > This may

[Bug fortran/90903] Implement runtime checks for bit manipulation intrinsics

2020-09-13 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90903 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch for MVBITS: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-September/055071.html

[Bug fortran/97037] ICE on user-defined derived-type output of an intermediate ancestor type

2020-09-13 Thread jvdelisle at charter dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97037 --- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle --- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89219

[Bug fortran/97037] ICE on user-defined derived-type output of an intermediate ancestor type

2020-09-13 Thread jvdelisle at charter dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97037 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at charter dot net --- Comment

[Bug preprocessor/91412] Unexpectedly correct raw string literal

2020-09-13 Thread tom at honermann dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91412 Tom Honermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tom at honermann dot net --- Comment #1

[Bug target/97040] New: incorrect fused multiply add/subtract instruction generated from C code

2020-09-13 Thread ddiculoiu at dspace dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97040 Bug ID: 97040 Summary: incorrect fused multiply add/subtract instruction generated from C code Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/97039] -fbounds-check misses violation with slice of array but not an element

2020-09-13 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97039 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/97031] the content of a comment line breaks compilation

2020-09-13 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97031 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl --- On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 08:02:01AM +, jean-pierre.flam...@univ-lille.fr wrote: > > I just noticed that cpp recognizes the extensions .fpp .F and other uppercase > extensions. > This is why I added -cpp in

[Bug fortran/97039] New: -fbounds-check misses violation with slice of array but not an element

2020-09-13 Thread anthony.debeus at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97039 Bug ID: 97039 Summary: -fbounds-check misses violation with slice of array but not an element Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/82943] [F03] Error with type-bound procedure of parametrized derived type

2020-09-13 Thread paul.luck...@rwth-aachen.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82943 paul.luck...@rwth-aachen.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paul.luck...@rwth-aachen.de

[Bug c++/97038] New: [[no_unique_address]] support anonymous unions

2020-09-13 Thread no_unique_address at mail dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97038 Bug ID: 97038 Summary: [[no_unique_address]] support anonymous unions Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug fortran/97031] the content of a comment line breaks compilation

2020-09-13 Thread jean-pierre.flam...@univ-lille.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97031 --- Comment #2 from jean-pierre.flam...@univ-lille.fr --- Thanks, However, if I launch "man cpp" or "man gfortran" I can't see anything in relation with my problem and traditional. I just noticed that cpp recognizes the extensions .fpp .F and o