[Bug c++/99215] New: coroutines: debugging with gdb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99215 Bug ID: 99215 Summary: coroutines: debugging with gdb Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Ass

[Bug c++/99214] Incorrect template arguments shown in constraint satisfaction failure diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99214 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka --- Changed with r11-2774.

[Bug c++/99214] New: Incorrect template arguments shown in constraint satisfaction failure diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99214 Bug ID: 99214 Summary: Incorrect template arguments shown in constraint satisfaction failure diagnostic Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/99213] Incorrect pretty printing of local class type when type's context contains a class template specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99213 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka --- "Started" with r10-7705. Fixing this is necessary for comprehensible diagnostics when using range adaptor objects from , since their partial application and composition operators work by returning local lamb

[Bug libstdc++/99172] Build failure with slibtool and vtv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99172 --- Comment #5 from gcc-user at riseup dot net --- Starting with gcc-10 gentoo is not going to enable --enable-vtable-verify by default anymore. https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=63c16d8b5e71b5f8e6185965062cf9c836800c29

[Bug c++/99213] New: Incorrect pretty printing of local class type when type's context contains a class template specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99213 Bug ID: 99213 Summary: Incorrect pretty printing of local class type when type's context contains a class template specialization Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0

[Bug analyzer/99212] New: [11 Regression] gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c line 971

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99212 Bug ID: 99212 Summary: [11 Regression] gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c line 971 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c/99211] New: gcc fails on program which overrides __builtin_clzll

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99211 Bug ID: 99211 Summary: gcc fails on program which overrides __builtin_clzll Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug debug/96997] [10/11 Regression] step over in gdb always stops in basic_string(const _CharT* __s, const _Alloc& __a = _Alloc())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96997 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/66668] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/stacked-qualified-types-3.c scan-assembler-times DIE \\([^\n]*\\) DW_TAG_(?:const|volatile|atomic|restrict)_type 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-07-01 00:00:00 |2021-2-23 --- Comment #14 from Hans

[Bug middle-end/95757] [11 regression] missing warning in gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-25.c since r11-1517

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95757 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug libstdc++/98384] [11 Regression] new test case 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc in r11-6249 fails on powerpc64 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:198c56052ea8cce4196e60c0dc3187bf3d67a786 commit r11-7337-g198c56052ea8cce4196e60c0dc3187bf3d67a786 Author: Patrick Palka Date: M

[Bug rtl-optimization/98782] [11 Regression] Bad interaction between IPA frequences and IRA resulting in spills due to changes in BB frequencies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98782 --- Comment #4 from Jiangning Liu --- Hi Honza, Do you see any other real case problems if the patch g:1118a3ff9d3ad6a64bba25dc01e7703325e23d92 is not applied? If exchange2 is the only one affected by this patch so far, and because we have obse

[Bug libfortran/99210] X editing for reading file with encoding='utf-8'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99210 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-02-23 CC|

[Bug fortran/98897] Erroneous procedure attribute for associate name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98897 --- Comment #8 from Damian Rouson --- Thanks, Paul and Tobias!

[Bug analyzer/99196] GCC analyzer doesn't know that error (code != 0, ...) exits the program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99196 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/99196] GCC analyzer doesn't know that error (code != 0, ...) exits the program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99196 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ee4ba031dd9fc60bf2494ca30f46c0acaa34805 commit r11-7333-g5ee4ba031dd9fc60bf2494ca30f46c0acaa34805 Author: David Malcolm Date: Mo

[Bug testsuite/99173] [11 Regression] new test case c-c++-common/attr-retain-5.c added in r11-7284 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99173 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug bootstrap/98181] Add support for FreeBSD on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98181 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/99138] ICE in gfc_match_rvalue, at fortran/primary.c:3738

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99138 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus --- The following fails the same way: module m interface module function f() class(*), allocatable :: f(:) end end interface contains module function f(x) class(*), allocat

[Bug testsuite/99173] [11 Regression] new test case c-c++-common/attr-retain-5.c added in r11-7284 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99173 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:609204abb889166c17a600121ba8ced18db2567a commit r11-7332-g609204abb889166c17a600121ba8ced18db2567a Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri Feb 19 15:

[Bug c++/99176] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC rejects const_cast of null pointer in constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99176 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Same problem for: constexpr int* ptr = (int *) (const int *) nullptr;

[Bug libfortran/99210] X editing for reading file with encoding='utf-8'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99210 Serguei E. Leontiev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leo at sai dot msu.ru --- Comment

[Bug libfortran/99210] New: X editing for reading file with encoding='utf-8'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99210 Bug ID: 99210 Summary: X editing for reading file with encoding='utf-8' Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug analyzer/99193] Bogus "should have been deallocated with 'free' but was deallocated with 'realloc' [CWE-762] [-Werror=analyzer-mismatching-deallocation]"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99193 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/99185] asan initialization-order-fiasco false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99185 --- Comment #8 from m.cencora at gmail dot com --- It does not matter whether A constructor is default or empty. If class instance cannot be constant-initialized then dynamic initialization will take place. I think gcc just incorrectly performs c

[Bug tree-optimization/80635] [8/9/10/11 regression] std::optional and bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635 --- Comment #58 from Martin Sebor --- Jeff's POC also suggests a workaround: changing the type of _Optional_payload_base::_M_engaged from bool to unsigned char avoids the VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR and avoids the warning. The difference in the uninit IL

[Bug debug/99178] Emit .debug_names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99178 --- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard --- So if the compiler would emit the .debug_name index would that make any link/post-processing steps easier or more efficient?

[Bug c++/99185] asan initialization-order-fiasco false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99185 --- Comment #7 from kal.conley at dectris dot com --- There is no fiasco here because the default constructor of `A` does no dynamic initialization. If the definition of `A` is changed to: struct A { int value; }; then the error goes away. How

[Bug fortran/99206] [11 Regression] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1980

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99206 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|u

[Bug c++/99201] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99201 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) --- Manual reduction which fails with 8-11 and compiles ok with 7: template void test_values_2arg(F&&... fun_pack) { (fun_pack(V(), V()), ...); } template auto make_tester(const TestF&

[Bug c++/99209] lambdas in function template signatures instantiated with wrong semantic context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99209 --- Comment #1 from Richard Smith --- Here's a more interesting example: https://godbolt.org/z/83c36q #include constexpr char f(...) { return 'g'; } constexpr decltype(auto) f_adl(auto a) { return f(a); } namespace A { constexpr char f(a

[Bug c++/99185] asan initialization-order-fiasco false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99185 --- Comment #6 from m.cencora at gmail dot com --- Now that I think about and having read relevant chapters of C++20 spec, observed behavior seems to be expected. A cannot be constant initialized (because it has missing initializer for 'value' me

[Bug c++/96251] [constexpr, coroutines] co_yield incorrectly rejected in non-explicitly-constexpr generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96251 --- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe --- patch posted : https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-February/565649.html

[Bug c++/99209] New: lambdas in function template signatures instantiated with wrong semantic context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99209 Bug ID: 99209 Summary: lambdas in function template signatures instantiated with wrong semantic context Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/90857] stl::forward_list::erase_after crashes if __pos == __last

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90857 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- It was pointed out on IRC that splice_after is affected the same way (if we change anything for erase_after we should do the same for splice_after).

[Bug fortran/99206] [11 Regression] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1980

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99206 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libfortran/98301] random_init() is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98301 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl --- On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 06:57:03PM +, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98301 > > --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl --- > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at

[Bug tree-optimization/99204] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in fold_read_from_constant_string, at fold-const.c:15441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99204 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug libfortran/98301] random_init() is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98301 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl --- On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 04:36:50AM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- > Steve, if you think this does it. I will get it ready to commit for you. Does > it al

[Bug tree-optimization/99204] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in fold_read_from_constant_string, at fold-const.c:15441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99204 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/99206] [11 Regression] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1980

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99206 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- As a sidenote: print *, len (reshape (['a'], [0])) end This prints 0 for gcc-11, and the correct value 1 for 10.2.1. Do we screw up things during simplification?

[Bug c++/99208] [modules] ICE with partitions & instantiations of linkage-typedef structs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99208 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug c++/99208] New: [modules] ICE with partitions & instantiations of linkage-typedef structs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99208 Bug ID: 99208 Summary: [modules] ICE with partitions & instantiations of linkage-typedef structs Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/99138] ICE in gfc_match_rvalue, at fortran/primary.c:3738

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99138 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #3) > Is the problem not that the parser is not picking up the incorrectly placed > print statement? It should never be passed to the matcher because it is in > the conta

[Bug target/66171] [8/9/10/11 Regression]: gcc.target/cris/biap.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66171 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|8.5

[Bug fortran/99206] [11 Regression] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1980

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99206 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFI

[Bug c++/99185] asan initialization-order-fiasco false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99185 --- Comment #5 from kal.conley at dectris dot com --- I don't think this has anything to do with C++20. The behavior doesn't change when compiling for C++17. In any case, `g` should be static initialized with zeros and no dynamic initialization in

[Bug fortran/99204] ICE in fold_read_from_constant_string, at fold-const.c:15441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99204 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug fortran/99138] ICE in gfc_match_rvalue, at fortran/primary.c:3738

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99138 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2) > Confirmed – with 'class(*), allocatable :: f(:)' it should be valid (with > prior assignment). > > The problem is in gfc_match_rvalue: > > 3737 if (sym->

[Bug fortran/99204] ICE in fold_read_from_constant_string, at fold-const.c:15441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99204 --- Comment #3 from G. Steinmetz --- Strange, for me the ICE is reproducible on different machines and also on https://godbolt.org/ (!) -- always with -O2.

[Bug analyzer/99196] GCC analyzer doesn't know that error (code != 0, ...) exits the program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99196 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones --- Note if errcode == 0 then error does NOT exit :-)

[Bug c/99207] #pragma pack(1) and __int128 lead to bad optimization under O2 and higher optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99207 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID CC|

[Bug c++/99200] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ used as template parameter causes internal compiler error (segmentation fault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99200 --- Comment #4 from JoaoBapt --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2) > Looks like a dup of 93383. No, because it works perfectly when I substitute __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ for any other string literal, even as big as one that would be "return

[Bug fortran/99125] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed (gimplify.c:15068)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99125 --- Comment #5 from G. Steinmetz --- I also checked this invalid (probably a known issue) : $ cat za.f90 program p character(:), allocatable :: a(:) character(8) :: c(2) = '12 45 78' a = c print *, a(7:8) end $ gfortran-11-2021022

[Bug fortran/99125] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed (gimplify.c:15068)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99125 --- Comment #4 from G. Steinmetz --- > What was the reason for the (7:8) in the testcase? If this question was directed at me, some background : The problem occurred during verification tests, in other code constellation and with other numbers

[Bug c/99207] New: #pragma pack(1) and __int128 lead to bad optimization under O2 and higher optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99207 Bug ID: 99207 Summary: #pragma pack(1) and __int128 lead to bad optimization under O2 and higher optimization Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug fortran/99204] ICE in fold_read_from_constant_string, at fold-const.c:15441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99204 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-02-22 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/99206] New: [11 Regression] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1980

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99206 Bug ID: 99206 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1980 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/99185] asan initialization-order-fiasco false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99185 m.cencora at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m.cencora at gmail dot com -

[Bug fortran/99205] New: [10/11 Regression] Out of memory with undefined character length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99205 Bug ID: 99205 Summary: [10/11 Regression] Out of memory with undefined character length Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/99204] ICE in fold_read_from_constant_string, at fold-const.c:15441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99204 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #1 from G

[Bug fortran/99204] New: ICE in fold_read_from_constant_string, at fold-const.c:15441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99204 Bug ID: 99204 Summary: ICE in fold_read_from_constant_string, at fold-const.c:15441 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug analyzer/99196] GCC analyzer doesn't know that error (code != 0, ...) exits the program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99196 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-02-22 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug sanitizer/99106] [9/10 Regression] ICE in tree_to_poly_int64, at tree.c:3091

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99106 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in |[9/10 Regression] ICE in

[Bug tree-optimization/99199] [9/10/11 Regression] Very large boolean expression leads to quite a few return statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99199 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Until before pro_and_epilogue we have a bb with just code_label, note and return reg use which has 65 predecessors. The pro_and_epilogue pass turns that into 65 simple_return jumps. The ret insns at the end a

[Bug sanitizer/99168] inconsistent behavior on -O0 and -O2 with ASAN on

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99168 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to zhan3299 from comment #4) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > > Very interesting issue, the failure is caused by IPA ICF that merges 2 > > variables with different alignments. I've got

[Bug c++/99186] std::tuple compilation error when elements are specializations of template class declared with template < auto E > syntax with E being a enumerator of a enum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99186 m.cencora at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m.cencora at gmail dot com -

[Bug libstdc++/99172] Build failure with slibtool and vtv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99172 --- Comment #4 from gcc-user at riseup dot net --- Thanks for the clarification, regardless -lvtv is then passed to the libtool implementation. With GNU libtool it is silently removed hiding the bug, while slibtool actually passes it to ld which f

[Bug sanitizer/99190] Undefined behaviour in libubsan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99190 --- Comment #5 from Vittorio Zecca --- Sorry I meant libubsan, but I am building the whole gcc, g++, and gfortran sanitized version.

[Bug fortran/96580] F2018 changes to date_and_time intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96580 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/99168] inconsistent behavior on -O0 and -O2 with ASAN on

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99168 --- Comment #4 from zhan3299 at purdue dot edu --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > Very interesting issue, the failure is caused by IPA ICF that merges 2 > variables with different alignments. I've got a patch candidate. Hi, just cur

[Bug c/99198] when combinating nested function and __builtin_call_with_static_chain, optimization triggers an internal compiler error (verify_gimple)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99198 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.2.0, 11.0, 5.5.0, 6.4.0,

[Bug testsuite/99173] [11 Regression] new test case c-c++-common/attr-retain-5.c added in r11-7284 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99173 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug libfortran/99191] sanitizer detects undefined behaviour in libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99191 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libquadmath/99203] New: Undefined behaviour in libquadmath file print_fp.c function __quadmath_printf_fp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99203 Bug ID: 99203 Summary: Undefined behaviour in libquadmath file print_fp.c function __quadmath_printf_fp Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libquadmath/99202] New: Undefined behaviour in libquadmath file rem_pio2q.c function __quadmath_rem_pio2q

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99202 Bug ID: 99202 Summary: Undefined behaviour in libquadmath file rem_pio2q.c function __quadmath_rem_pio2q Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug c++/99174] [modules] ICE with recursive inclusion of header-unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99174 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/99190] Undefined behaviour in libubsan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99190 --- Comment #4 from Vittorio Zecca --- To generate a sanitized version of libgfortran I built whole sanitized gcc with the following command: CFLAGS="-g -O0 -fsanitize=undefined -lubsan" LIBS="-lubsan" CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS ../gcc-150221/configure --

[Bug c++/99174] [modules] ICE with recursive inclusion of header-unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99174 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:afed55036b65526be006d55f003f670ebeadb223 commit r11-7324-gafed55036b65526be006d55f003f670ebeadb223 Author: Nathan Sidwell Date:

[Bug target/85074] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr81812.C (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85074 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/98718] [modules] use of partitions causes ICE in write_macro_maps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98718 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/85074] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr81812.C (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85074 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by John David Anglin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89b7f2b821e0a158fee586b3d655f9a7d925b9c3 commit r10-9382-g89b7f2b821e0a158fee586b3d655f9a7d925b9c3 Author: John David A

[Bug c++/99201] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99201 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) --- I'll try to find a better reduction.

[Bug libstdc++/99172] Build failure with slibtool and vtv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99172 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to gcc-user from comment #2) > Briefly it explained that -lvtv comes from -fvtable-verify=std in a gcc spec > file and is propogated to Makefile.in by gcc/Makefile.def. The -fvtable-verify=std do

[Bug target/85074] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr81812.C (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85074 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d789cf134b7e04ffd90e9512e3e591bd16dc6655 commit r11-7323-gd789cf134b7e04ffd90e9512e3e591bd16dc6655 Author: John David Anglin Da

[Bug c++/99201] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99201 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/99200] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ used as template parameter causes internal compiler error (segmentation fault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99200 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/99200] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ used as template parameter causes internal compiler error (segmentation fault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99200 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-02-22 See Also|

[Bug c++/99201] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99201 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5 CC|

[Bug analyzer/99196] GCC analyzer doesn't know that error (code != 0, ...) exits the program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99196 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Compon

[Bug analyzer/99193] Bogus "should have been deallocated with 'free' but was deallocated with 'realloc' [CWE-762] [-Werror=analyzer-mismatching-deallocation]"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99193 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Assig

[Bug sanitizer/99190] Undefined behaviour in libubsan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99190 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Interesting, you are searching for UBSAN in libsanitizer. Can you please share details how do you build libubsan with -fsanitize=shift?

[Bug libstdc++/99172] Build failure with slibtool and vtv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99172 --- Comment #2 from gcc-user at riseup dot net --- > Note swapping out parts of the build system isn't tested/supported. This is both a gcc and GNU libtool bug, gcc is passing invalid flags and libtool is silently hiding the fact. I understand t

[Bug sanitizer/99168] inconsistent behavior on -O0 and -O2 with ASAN on

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99168 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Very interesting issue, the failure is caused by IPA ICF that merges 2 variables with different alignments. I've got a patch candidate.

[Bug c++/99201] New: ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99201 Bug ID: 99201 Summary: ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16581 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/99153] [11 Regression] ICE: depset::hash::make_dependency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99153 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/99153] [11 Regression] ICE: depset::hash::make_dependency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99153 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c49fcfddaa47f2828fe2af11ae857cd67f53e23f commit r11-7322-gc49fcfddaa47f2828fe2af11ae857cd67f53e23f Author: Nathan Sidwell Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/99199] [9/10/11 Regression] Very large boolean expression leads to quite a few return statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99199 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/99181] char_traits (and thus string_view) compares strings differently in constexpr and non-constexpr contexts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99181 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- We're in namespace std here so size_t doesn't need to be qualified, but otherwise the patch is fine.

  1   2   >