[Bug bootstrap/100246] [11/12 Regression] GCC will not bootstrap with clang 3.4/3.5 [xcode 5/6, Darwin 12/13]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100246 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/100246] [11/12 Regression] GCC will not bootstrap with clang 3.4/3.5 [xcode 5/6, Darwin 12/13]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100246 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5dd3fe90a5c0067e3e21d81aa904d13a4154eb4a commit r11-8788-g5dd3fe90a5c0067e3e21d81aa904d13a4154eb4a Author: Iain Sandoe Da

[Bug c++/95520] [coroutines] __builtin_FUNCTION() returns mangled .actor instead of original function name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95520 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a93c67f21818eafd6823a7c3d06db1432f9c07b commit r11-8787-g3a93c67f21818eafd6823a7c3d06db1432f9c07b Author: Iain Sandoe Dat

[Bug c++/99215] coroutines: debugging with gdb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99215 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:feef2e414d45f732509ab044d4ad14aed125b024 commit r11-8786-gfeef2e414d45f732509ab044d4ad14aed125b024 Author: Iain Sandoe Da

[Bug tree-optimization/57702] Reassoc missed optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57702 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added URL||\ Severity|normal

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #56 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:383295aaada04b02b733ab6b9e069dfb020d47b3 commit r11-8784-g383295aaada04b02b733ab6b9e069dfb020d47b3 Author: Iain Sandoe D

[Bug tree-optimization/67628] [tree-optimization] (a && b) && c shows better codegen than a && (b && c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67628 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2021-06-07 00:00:00 |2021-7-19 Severity|normal

[Bug tree-optimization/89263] Simplify bool expression to OR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89263 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gabravier at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/99069] Failure to optimize bool selection pattern

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99069 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/99069] Failure to optimize bool selection pattern

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99069 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/99069] Failure to optimize bool selection pattern

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99069 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-07-20 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug tree-optimization/55802] Various missed optimizations for a simple function in GCC itself

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55802 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2019-03-04 00:00:00 |2021-7-19 Severity|normal

[Bug tree-optimization/97711] Failure to optimise "x & 1 ? x - 1 : x" to "x & -2"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97711 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- So GCC already converts the following two functions at the gimple level: int f1 (int x) { return x - (x & 1); } char *g1 (char *x) { return x - ((__UINTPTR_TYPE__) x & 1); } - CUT Even on the RTL

[Bug analyzer/101522] New: ICE: Segmentation fault (in ana::binding_cluster::purge_state_involving)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101522 Bug ID: 101522 Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault (in ana::binding_cluster::purge_state_involving) Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-o

[Bug target/100182] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc and atomic_float/wait_notify.cc on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug target/100182] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc and atomic_float/wait_notify.cc on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182 --- Comment #35 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5972907bd0528a04eb8fa4f9897714724da53f04 commit r9-9634-g5972907bd0528a04eb8fa4f9897714724da53f04 Author: Uros Bizjak Date:

[Bug target/100182] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc and atomic_float/wait_notify.cc on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182 --- Comment #34 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff3a8cd277752fd6167c39c00391662e47f1d1c0 commit r10-9992-gff3a8cd277752fd6167c39c00391662e47f1d1c0 Author: Uros Bizjak Dat

[Bug target/100182] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc and atomic_float/wait_notify.cc on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182 --- Comment #33 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2060ae92f22e4877af21018cf3b8cc2eca4745e commit r11-8783-gf2060ae92f22e4877af21018cf3b8cc2eca4745e Author: Uros Bizjak Dat

[Bug target/100182] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc and atomic_float/wait_notify.cc on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182 --- Comment #32 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d4da4aeef5b20f7f9693ddc27d26740d0dbe36c commit r12-2407-g6d4da4aeef5b20f7f9693ddc27d26740d0dbe36c Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Tue

[Bug target/101472] AVX-512 wrong code for consecutive masked scatters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101472 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wwwhhhyyy333 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/85636] Tree if-conversion inserts redundant loads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85636 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I don't see this on the trunk: _1 = (long unsigned int) i_31; _2 = _1 * 4; _3 = c_11(D) + _2; v_12 = *_3; _6 = a_15(D) + _2; iftmp.1_8 = v_12 == 20 ? y_13(D) : x_14(D); _26 = v_12 != 20 ? y_13(D

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 100696, which changed state. Bug 100696 Summary: mult_higpart is not vectorized https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100696 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/100696] mult_higpart is not vectorized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100696 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/100696] mult_higpart is not vectorized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100696 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1d27560770818c514ad1ad6683f89e1e1bcd0ec commit r12-2404-ga1d27560770818c514ad1ad6683f89e1e1bcd0ec Author: Kewen Lin Date: Mon Jul 1

[Bug middle-end/54571] Missed optimization converting between bit sets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54571 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dhowells at redhat dot com --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/78317] "if (x & constant) z |= constant" should not be rendered with jumps and conditional moves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78317 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug target/101471] AVX512 incorrect writemask generated for _mm512_fpclass_ps_mask in O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101471 --- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu --- We need to fixed for -O0 in header file.

[Bug target/101471] AVX512 incorrect writemask generated for _mm512_fpclass_ps_mask in O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101471 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wwwhhhyyy333 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/81549] PHI node should be eliminated if loop iterates enough times.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81549 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/80574] GCC fail to optimize nested ternary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80574 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/80574] GCC fail to optimize nested ternary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80574 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski -

[Bug tree-optimization/64700] Sink common code through PHI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64700 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug tree-optimization/43423] gcc should vectorize this loop through if-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43423 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Severity|normal

[Bug tree-optimization/57702] Reassoc missed optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57702 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2013-06-25 00:00:00 |2021-7-19 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pin

[Bug tree-optimization/57567] Missed optimisation: compare + or

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57567 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/38943] Optimization removes trapping instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38943 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/95102] missed if-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95102 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #0) > If you rewrite gcc.target/i386/pr54855-9.c to a form GIMPLE looks like after > some PRE you end up with I ran into this same thing when I was working on improvi

[Bug rtl-optimization/95102] missed if-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95102 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/85390] possible missed optimisation / regression from 6.3 with conditional expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85390 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- More likely we don't normally pull loads above conditionals at all especially when there is one on each side. Doing this: extern int a, b, c; int f(int x, int b, int a) { __builtin_prefetch((void *) (x ?

[Bug middle-end/85559] [meta-bug] Improve conditional move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85559 Bug 85559 depends on bug 46279, which changed state. Bug 46279 Summary: cmov not hoisted out of the loop https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46279 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/46279] cmov not hoisted out of the loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46279 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Depends on|

[Bug tree-optimization/71336] Suboptimal code generated for "(a & 1) ? (CST1 + CST2) : CST1"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71336 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > Sorry this one is more correct > Something like (very much pesdu code): > (simplify > (cond (eq (bit_and@0 @1 int_pow2p@2) integer_zerop) INTEGET_CST@3 > INTEGER

[Bug tree-optimization/71336] Suboptimal code generated for "(a & 1) ? (CST1 + CST2) : CST1"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71336 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/71336] Suboptimal x86 code generated for "(a & 1) ? (CST1 + CST2) : CST1"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71336 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization --- Comment #7 from An

[Bug rtl-optimization/71336] Suboptimal x86 code generated for "(a & 1) ? (CST1 + CST2) : CST1"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71336 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Sorry this one is more correct Something like (very much pesdu code): (simplify (cond (eq (bit_and@0 @1 int_pow2p@2) integer_zerop) INTEGET_CST@3 INTEGER_CST@4) (switch (if (@3 u> @4 && exact_pow2(@3 - @4

[Bug rtl-optimization/71336] Suboptimal x86 code generated for "(a & 1) ? (CST1 + CST2) : CST1"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71336 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2016-05-30 00:00:00 |2021-7-19 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pin

[Bug rtl-optimization/40987] ifcvt sometimes goes wrong for integer modes > 64bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40987 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11) > This bug is now hard to hit on the trunk as i?86 requires host wide word as > 64bit. HWINT is now required to be 64bit for all targets even. So this might happ

[Bug rtl-optimization/14418] Unnecessary loads and stores for tail call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14418 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2006-10-22 21:08:49 |2021-7-19 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pin

[Bug c/100501] ICE: segmentation fault on embedded asm code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100501 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/100360] scalar operation fails the compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100360 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITING

[Bug inline-asm/99998] Unnecessary jump instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Component|c

[Bug preprocessor/88544] ICE on ARM Cortex A7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88544 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITING

[Bug c/81779] [7 Regression] bool define from stdbool.h suppresses -Wdeclaration-after-statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81779 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/77779] unnecessary trap checks for pointer subtraction with -ftrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- This might be fixed now but I could be wrong.

[Bug middle-end/66630] Missing ubsan/ftrapv error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66630 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net --- Commen

[Bug middle-end/87311] missing integer overflow detection on negation of the minimum value with -ftrapv or UB sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87311 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/101521] New: -ftrapv should become something like -fsanitize=undefined -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101521 Bug ID: 101521 Summary: -ftrapv should become something like -fsanitize=undefined -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Statu

[Bug testsuite/101520] [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr93658.c has excess errors after r12-2338

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101520 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/101510] std::filesystem::create_directory on an existing symlink to a directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigne

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #255 from Larkin Nickle --- Here's the log from the attempted 11.1 build against binutils 2.30. Built with 4.8.5. I'm not able to attach this as it's over the max size limit. https://gist.githubusercontent.com/larb0b/f3a855892f7b16f4

[Bug middle-end/80410] Improve merging of identical branches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80410 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Component|c

[Bug c/48274] C frontend emit invalid promotions (TARGET_PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES )

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48274 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2011-03-24 14:58:31 |2021-7-19 Keywords|

[Bug target/100182] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc and atomic_float/wait_notify.cc on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182 --- Comment #31 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #30) > (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #29) > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #28) > > > 29_atomics/atomic_ref/wait_notify.c has the same issue on Linux/x86-64 > >

[Bug testsuite/101520] [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr93658.c has excess errors after r12-2338

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101520 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-07-19 Component|other

[Bug target/100182] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc and atomic_float/wait_notify.cc on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182 --- Comment #30 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #29) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #28) > > 29_atomics/atomic_ref/wait_notify.c has the same issue on Linux/x86-64 with > > -m32: > > Are you sure? The mentioned peeph

[Bug c++/101219] [12 Regression] ice in perform_or_defer_access_check since r12-1804-g65870e75616ee435

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101219 --- Comment #5 from Sergei Trofimovich --- build_ptrmemfunc_type() creates fresh RECORD_TYPE for (each?) __pfn. Should it probably populate TYPE_BINFO(t) as well? https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=gcc/cp/decl.c;h=01d64a16125ec0bb8e3798

[Bug c++/101219] [12 Regression] ice in perform_or_defer_access_check since r12-1804-g65870e75616ee435

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101219 --- Comment #4 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Got the same mednafen crash today. Poked slightly at the context in gdb. >From what I understand the crash happens when analysing statement `void (PCEFast_PSG::*ch_0)(int, int *);`. There is no access

[Bug other/101520] New: [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr93658.c has excess errors after r12-2338

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101520 Bug ID: 101520 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr93658.c has excess errors after r12-2338 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/101129] [11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O1 since r11-5839

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101129 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/101129] [11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O1 since r11-5839

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101129 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by William Schmidt : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3e4b43ec9a937866ead88e996bd200b116a1766c commit r9-9632-g3e4b43ec9a937866ead88e996bd200b116a1766c Author: Bill Schmidt

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #254 from Larkin Nickle --- I've now tried 11.1.0 almost exactly as The Written Word builds it, and still get: during GIMPLE pass: dce ../../libiberty/mkstemps.c: In function 'mkstemps': ../../libiberty/mkstemps.c:80:1: internal comp

[Bug tree-optimization/101511] [12 Regression] ice in query_relation, at value-relation.cc:879

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101511 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug sanitizer/101111] xgcc cross-compiler for x86_64-apple-darwin in GCC 11.1 doesn't generate weak symbols, resulting in undefined reference to ___lsan_default_suppressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10 --- Comment #7 from Mosè Giordano --- Bump. Is there any chance someone can review a one-line patch? :)

[Bug c++/95520] [coroutines] __builtin_FUNCTION() returns mangled .actor instead of original function name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95520 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:237ab3ee49e2f3110accfcc03b6c0df8b4889f15 commit r12-2400-g237ab3ee49e2f3110accfcc03b6c0df8b4889f15 Author: Iain Sandoe Date: Thu

[Bug fortran/101513] ICE in gfc_alloc_allocatable_for_assignment, at fortran/trans-array.c:10313

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101513 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-07-19 Ever confirme

[Bug c++/101519] Improve diagnostic for template name used as base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101519 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Last reco

[Bug c++/101519] New: Improve diagnostic for template name used as base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101519 Bug ID: 101519 Summary: Improve diagnostic for template name used as base class Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic S

[Bug analyzer/101503] [12 Regression] ICE in involves_p, at analyzer/svalue.cc:557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101503 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/101503] [12 Regression] ICE in involves_p, at analyzer/svalue.cc:557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101503 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a113b14398f2a4ad2742e6e9c87e25cac60f263e commit r12-2399-ga113b14398f2a4ad2742e6e9c87e25cac60f263e Author: David Malcolm Date: M

[Bug target/101129] [11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O1 since r11-5839

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101129 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by William Schmidt : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ecad28561c47f5b2652a03e9b67cf37c13d88f53 commit r10-9990-gecad28561c47f5b2652a03e9b67cf37c13d88f53 Author: Bill Schmidt

[Bug testsuite/31290] gcc.c-torture/execute/920612-1.c and gcc.c-torture/execute/920711-1.c depend on signed overflow being defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31290 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/101473] debug_line info depends on toolchain path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101473 --- Comment #12 from tonyb at cybernetics dot com --- The patch fixed my own programs, so I rebuilt all of Yocto with -flto in two different directories. I found that most shared libraries in /lib and /usr/lib still have the problem (i.e. are st

[Bug tree-optimization/101518] Invalid value in bit-field when setting underlying data through reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101518 --- Comment #2 from Alexey Klimkin --- Thank you for your prompt reply!

[Bug tree-optimization/101518] Invalid value in bit-field when setting underlying data through reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101518 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/57668] Regression in vectorizing memcpy pattern.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57668 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2013-06-24 00:00:00 |2021-7-19 Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/101497] [12 Regression] ice in type, at value-range.h:221

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101497 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod --- uc_1.0_1 = uc_1; _2 = (int) uc_1.0_1; _3 = 211 - _2; _3 evaluates as 211 - [-128, 127], or [84, 339] _4 = _3 > 0; _5 = (int) _4; func_12_uli_6 = _5; i_4.1_6 = i_4; _7 = i_4.1_6 % 0; W

[Bug tree-optimization/101518] New: Invalid value in bit-field when setting underlying data through reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101518 Bug ID: 101518 Summary: Invalid value in bit-field when setting underlying data through reference Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug testsuite/101517] Some testcases were lost when tree-ssa was merged

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101517 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I should note the tree-ssa merge is r0-58166 .

[Bug testsuite/101517] New: Some testcases were lost when tree-ssa was merged

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101517 Bug ID: 101517 Summary: Some testcases were lost when tree-ssa was merged Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c++/100828] Arbitrary limit on constraint complexity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100828 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/52258] __builtin_isgreaterequal is sometimes signaling on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52258 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this was fixed in GCC 10 with r10-6245 and maybe a few others.

[Bug tree-optimization/101496] [12 Regression] ice during GIMPLE pass: evrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101496 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-07-19 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug target/39677] AMD Opteron E needs workaround for lock erratum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39677 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/101129] [11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O1 since r11-5839

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101129 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by William Schmidt : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac0efe3c6fc6231b20ffd684956a4a5c3c54a96b commit r11-8780-gac0efe3c6fc6231b20ffd684956a4a5c3c54a96b Author: Bill Schmidt

[Bug target/3985] AIX -mcpu=630 -maix64 does not use ppc64 multilib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3985 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/101515] [11/12 Regression] ICE in pp_cxx_unqualified_id, at cp/cxx-pretty-print.c:128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101515 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Component|c++

[Bug c++/101516] New: [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in finish_omp_reduction_clause, at cp/semantics.c:6075

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101516 Bug ID: 101516 Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in finish_omp_reduction_clause, at cp/semantics.c:6075 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug c++/101515] New: [11/12 Regression] ICE in pp_cxx_unqualified_id, at cp/cxx-pretty-print.c:128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101515 Bug ID: 101515 Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in pp_cxx_unqualified_id, at cp/cxx-pretty-print.c:128 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/101512] [11/12 Regression] ICE in maybe_trim_constructor_store, at tree-ssa-dse.c:379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101512 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.0|11.2

[Bug tree-optimization/101512] [11/12 Regression] ICE in maybe_trim_constructor_store, at tree-ssa-dse.c:379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101512 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

  1   2   3   >