https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68903
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Seems fixed on trunk; maybe by the fix for PR 98744.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100894
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100894
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e54986854831a4c66b308f98aff949ca7d3ce84
commit r10-10026-g0e54986854831a4c66b308f98aff949ca7d3ce84
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101843
--- Comment #5 from john henning ---
Andrew suggests: Combined source builds are not for released sources
Respectfully, I suggest that the documentation disagrees.
Please see the binutils paragraph of the documentation of the released version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78826
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is another one where GCC6- used to reject and in GCC7+ accepts (note this
looks to be only valid C++11 anyways):
struct vec { vec () = default; };
void ggg () {
goto out;
vec odsd;
out: ;
}
CU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101843
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Combined source builds are not for released sources unless you are going to
change/fix them yourself. They are useful for building the trunk sources only
really.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yawaraka.7-11.hemogurobin@e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93992
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101847
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qwdkguneykiffmmuyd at uivvn
dot ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101848
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|11.2.0, 12.0|
Last reconfirmed|2021-08-10 00:00:00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101847
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ba0376ac40447ce7ee09fcef00511c18db25dfa
commit r12-2839-g2ba0376ac40447ce7ee09fcef00511c18db25dfa
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101305
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ba0376ac40447ce7ee09fcef00511c18db25dfa
commit r12-2839-g2ba0376ac40447ce7ee09fcef00511c18db25dfa
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101660
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ba0376ac40447ce7ee09fcef00511c18db25dfa
commit r12-2839-g2ba0376ac40447ce7ee09fcef00511c18db25dfa
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101848
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101848
Bug ID: 101848
Summary: Template metaprogramming errors in v11.1
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39057
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Last reconfirmed|2021-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101843
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
You can certainly use gcc 11 and binutils 2.37 together, just not building them
in a single source tree.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70608
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fchelnokov at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101840
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101847
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101847
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101847
Bug ID: 101847
Summary: [12 regression] linker errors after r12-2808
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101846
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-10
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87805
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101843
--- Comment #2 from john henning ---
If this is a doc bug, then two documentation comments
and one other thought.
(1) https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-11/changes.html says that certain
functionality requires “Binutils version 2.36 or later”.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101846
Bug ID: 101846
Summary: Improve __builtin_shufflevector emitted code
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101809
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:557d06f8b3ddb54bca134695e117c40c6e2267ab
commit r12-2838-g557d06f8b3ddb54bca134695e117c40c6e2267ab
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue Aug 10 05
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101830
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
If I commit the build patch, everyone who doesn't build with --disable-werror
will blame me for breaking bootstrap.
I thought perhaps the way safe_inc_pos was implemented might have made it
possible for the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101843
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |bootstrap
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101811
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Schlüter ---
Sure, that's a good argument (before I18N), and I guess it matches the general
style.
Anyway, I'll try to keep myself from bikeshedding this further, I'm sure the
person fixing this will have enough time
f8e42b3-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-aarch64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20210810 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101811
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Tobias Schlüter from comment #4)
> we are at a stage where grammatical niceties matter, I would make the symbol
> in the first message the subject, so
>
> :6:6: error: 'template void X::f()'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101811
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Schlüter ---
Hi Jonathan,
I know that we disagree about clang's error message and that's why I tried to
explain what makes clang's a better error message for me. My "parsing" of
clang's error message was not a compa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57012
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101842
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > > OK, so with a hack like the following we vectorize the BB
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101844
Bug ID: 101844
Summary: Don't pretty print template parameter names that
aren't needed
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57014
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101843
Bug ID: 101843
Summary: Build of binutils-2.37 with gcc-11.2.0 fails due to
change to libiberty/hashtab.c
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101840
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101842
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > OK, so with a hack like the following we vectorize the BB as
> >
> > vect__1.10_62 = MEM [(float *)p_34];
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101811
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Tobias Schlüter from comment #2)
> Hi Jonathan,
> actually I found clang's error message a lot more helpful, I just didn't
> bother to write it explicitly, especially given that my compiler ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101842
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> OK, so with a hack like the following we vectorize the BB as
>
> vect__1.10_62 = MEM [(float *)p_34];
> vect_powmult_9.11_61 = vect__1.10_62 * vect__1.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80355
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80355
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:50b5877925ef5ae8e9f913d6d2b5ce0204ebc588
commit r12-2837-g50b5877925ef5ae8e9f913d6d2b5ce0204ebc588
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101809
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101809
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08aa0e3d4f781fd6a6e293bb06d280365a0bdc1d
commit r12-2836-g08aa0e3d4f781fd6a6e293bb06d280365a0bdc1d
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101842
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
OK, so with a hack like the following we vectorize the BB as
vect__1.10_62 = MEM [(float *)p_34];
vect_powmult_9.11_61 = vect__1.10_62 * vect__1.10_62;
_60 = .REDUC_PLUS (vect_powmult_9.11_61);
d_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52959
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This is a rather unhelpful bug report. For anybody else wondering what the OP
is actually saying: the commented-out errors in the original report show
clang's output, and the request is that GCC should do s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101842
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101842
Bug ID: 101842
Summary: Vectorizer doesn't vectorize when loop bound depends
on two independent variables that are unknown
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80355
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7665af0b1a964b1baae3a59b22fcc420369c63cf
commit r12-2835-g7665af0b1a964b1baae3a59b22fcc420369c63cf
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100150
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100150
>
> Martin Liška changed:
>
>What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101809
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
I am testing a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100150
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101819
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101801
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19d1a529fa9f78e7ec7be38d423c90e00cec8f8c
commit r12-2832-g19d1a529fa9f78e7ec7be38d423c90e00cec8f8c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101819
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19d1a529fa9f78e7ec7be38d423c90e00cec8f8c
commit r12-2832-g19d1a529fa9f78e7ec7be38d423c90e00cec8f8c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101841
Bug ID: 101841
Summary: Wrong realloc-lhs warning with matmul and -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101824
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101824
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bb169406cdc9e044eaec500dd742c2fed40f5488
commit r12-2831-gbb169406cdc9e044eaec500dd742c2fed40f5488
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101819
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Happens also on x86_64:
$ gcc /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr51581-3.c
-mno-mmx -Ofast -mno-sse -c
during RTL pass: expand
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33437
jbeulich at suse dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101837
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Sum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101840
Bug ID: 101840
Summary: Friendship must be extended on default argument
initializer
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101833
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101839
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> BA::fill can be declared virtual without any change (it is implicitely so as
> stated by the C++ standard it seems).
Correct.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100150
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101839
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11/12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101839
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Apparently, -fprofile-generate is not needed, w/o it it started with the same
revision.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101839
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101839
Bug ID: 101839
Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] Hand in C++ code with
-fdevirtualize
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100150
Krzysztof Nowicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krzysztof.a.nowicki+gcc@gma
101 - 176 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
