https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34211
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36258
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30484
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 23 Aug 2021, vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30484
>
> --- Comment #14 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
> Well, you could change the definiti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100061
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Tobias S. Josefowitz from comment #10)
> Is the 10.4 milestone really applicable here, or might that in practice be
> something that would cause this bug to go somewhat unnoticed?
The 10.4 mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12411
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Component|other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90142
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82704
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82704
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh and --md5 option is actually was broken :).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82704
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54182
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50597
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31043
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |middle-end
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101904
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102029
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:78fa5112b4c2dcd94b78ee79baddebbf14d6ad98
commit r12-3104-g78fa5112b4c2dcd94b78ee79baddebbf14d6ad98
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Tue A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43147
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|hjl.tools at gmail dot com |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102027
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> > There are calls to vector_mode_supported_p in stor-layout which changes the
>
> It sounds odd to me since vector_mode_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102027
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> There are calls to vector_mode_supported_p in stor-layout which changes the
It sounds odd to me since vector_mode_supported_p can change overtime.
> TYPE_MODE of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102030
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102030
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
With -W -Wall I get the following warnings:
In file included from
/home/joeedh/blender/blender/intern/atomic/atomic_ops.h:138,
from
/home/joeedh/blender/blender/build/../source/blender/blenl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100089
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:819b7c3a339e3bdaf85cd55954c5536bd98aae09
commit r12-3103-g819b7c3a339e3bdaf85cd55954c5536bd98aae09
Author: liuhongt
Date: Wed Aug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101996
--- Comment #5 from Jim Wilson ---
A riscv-gnu-toolchain build with musl looks OK, so it looks like an Alpine
Linux problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101600
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101977
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102030
--- Comment #1 from Joe Eagar ---
I forgot to add, the offending function is BM_mesh_bm_from_me:
void BM_mesh_bm_from_me(Object *ob,
BMesh *bm,
const Mesh *me,
const struc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102030
Bug ID: 102030
Summary: Optimization turns null ptr true
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25623
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 22401 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22401
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102013
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is interesting:
struct A { int x = 6; };
struct B { int x = 3; };
union U {
A a;
B b;
};
static_assert (U{}.a.x==6);
U a{};
int main() {
if (a.a.x != 6)
__builtin_abort();
}
The stati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101996
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102025
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
So it looks like COMMON_LVB_REVERSE_VIDEO is defined sometimes but not in all
versions of the header files.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11582
Wolfgang Bangerth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102029
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102000
--- Comment #3 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña ---
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51560#c1 points out
> I'm not sure what you think the problem is here. The constructor isn't
> getting called; see http://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.init.genera
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11582
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
Since GCC 11 we produce:
: In function 'void g()':
:7:4: error: no matching function for call to 'f(int [])'
7 | f( buf ) ;
| ~^~~
:3:28: note: candidate: 'template void f(int (&)[N])'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95933
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Until Bar::Foo is instantiated, no error is required.
There is another bug about this already too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94501
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-23
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30484
--- Comment #14 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
Well, you could change the definition of -fwrapv in the same way that the
standard has changed. I mean that the intent of making INT_MIN / -1 undefined
was *only* for a performance reason (not for a mathem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99460
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101830
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by William Schmidt :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:30c335ac44ecb4f17645925360177618763d7c48
commit r12-3097-g30c335ac44ecb4f17645925360177618763d7c48
Author: Bill Schmidt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94511
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2020-04-07 00:00:00 |2021-8-23
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #5)
> "structure layout happens before the zero width bitfields are removed by the
> FE".
>
> So, what can break still, then?
Homogeneous aggregates can br
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
"structure layout happens before the zero width bitfields are removed by the
FE".
So, what can break still, then?
- li 9,0
- sldi 9,9,32
- mtvsrd 1,9
+ li 3,0
std 0,16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102027
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> There are calls to vector_mode_supported_p in stor-layout which changes the
> TYPE_MODE of the RECORD_TYPE depending on if vector_mode_supported_p returns
> true or no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102029
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102028
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100061
--- Comment #10 from Tobias S. Josefowitz ---
Is the 10.4 milestone really applicable here, or might that in practice be
something that would cause this bug to go somewhat unnoticed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101997
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 51348
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51348&action=edit
Partial backport of commit ac932bfcd21e9523fa2b880ae8138aef79da7f54
It's not that the cherry-pick w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102028
--- Comment #2 from Lars Maier ---
You are right. Thank you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102027
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102029
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-23
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102017
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
If you want to support exceptions and rounding modes for double precision
on processors with hardware support for single-precision only
floating-point arithmetic, I suggest using soft-fp i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102029
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102028
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is the template which gets matched:
/**
* @brief Generic inserter for rvalue stream
* @param __os An input stream.
* @param __x A reference to the object being inserted.
* @return
esults.20210823/bin/gcc -c -O2 bug743.c
bug743.c: In function ‘qfb_reduce’:
bug743.c:2:25: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘__gmpz_neg’
[-Wimplici
t-function-declaration]
2 | void qfb_reduce(void) { __gmpz_neg((int *)(fmpz_neg_f2 << 2)); }
| ^~~
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30484
--- Comment #13 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
For -fwrapv, the mathematical values of INT_MIN / -1 and INT_MIN % -1
should be reduced using modulo arithmetic, so both operations are
well-defined, and there is a bug then either operati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102027
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
gcc-11 does:
:
0: 55 push %rbp
1: 48 89 e5mov%rsp,%rbp
4: 48 8b 05 00 00 00 00mov0x0(%rip),%rax# b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102027
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #0)
> We have an ABI break. Discovered by
> Running
> /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/gcc-11.2.1-20210728/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat/struct-
> layout-1.exp ...
> FAIL: tmpdir-gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101962
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Should be fixed on trunk for gcc 12 by the above commit.
I plan to backport this to gcc 11; keeping it open until that's done.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101837
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101875
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102028
Bug ID: 102028
Summary: std::ostream& used as std::stringstream&
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97565
--- Comment #9 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Tested gcc-master against spidermonkey-78.13.0 with -flto -fipa-pta -O1. Works
without a problem. Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101875
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d654ca3f421ff9646470d312097602037176352
commit r12-3096-g3d654ca3f421ff9646470d312097602037176352
Author: David Malcolm
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101964
--- Comment #6 from Mateus Morais Dias de Souza ---
I was a wrong of me, my apologizes. I'll not do it again
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101837
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b821c7efbe12cfbb129a88541108b39058da526
commit r12-3095-g4b821c7efbe12cfbb129a88541108b39058da526
Author: David Malcolm
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102027
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Summary|ABI break when u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102027
Bug ID: 102027
Summary: ABI break when using vector type in function
arg/return value
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101962
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e82e0f149b0aba660896ea9aa12c442c07a16d12
commit r12-3094-ge82e0f149b0aba660896ea9aa12c442c07a16d12
Author: David Malcolm
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101882
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Started with r9-3950-g2f0b80c7a4ab4254f57ba63de26ebb7896e3742d
> Does the modsw instruction really need the early-clobber (i.e. does it first
> overwrite th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102026
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, it should be [[__unlikely__]], thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102026
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
Another thing that seems noteworthy is in variant#L402:
void _M_reset()
{
if (!_M_valid()) [[unlikely]]
return;
We use C++20 attributes in the C++17 feature library, so I don’t know whet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82940
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #7)
> (In reply to Peter Cordes from comment #6)
> > # power64 GCC 9.2.1 (ATI13.0)
> > rlwimi 3,4,0,255# bit-blend according to mask, rotate count
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82940
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Peter Cordes from comment #6)
> # power64 GCC 9.2.1 (ATI13.0)
> rlwimi 3,4,0,255# bit-blend according to mask, rotate count=0
> rldicl 3,3,0,32 # Is this zero-extensi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55549
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Three things:
1) It was invalid *before* this, already (vector mode paradoxical subregs
make no sense);
2) The subreg needs to be fixed up *somehow*, too;
3) subreg of mem will go away any day now (or,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102026
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96523
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rafael at espindo dot la
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90493
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102017
--- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw ---
There are a number of complications here:
- What's the code size overhead? Even if the performance overhead is trivial,
I suspect the additional code might be non-trivial on an m-profile device, so
is th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90493
--- Comment #4 from S. Davis Herring ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> Reduced to show just the rejects-valid part:
>
> template extern const int foo = 41;
> // this is an error:
> // error: explicit template specialization ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102026
Bug ID: 102026
Summary: The comment on the instantiation description of
__variant::__gen_vtable_impl can be updated
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101723
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101723
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14a21ac5b8cd79e973f7f6cfd534a80bf25a0328
commit r9-9691-g14a21ac5b8cd79e973f7f6cfd534a80bf25a0328
Author: Christophe Ly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101723
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04c568961e793a1d7ad86248b4ca929fc84acf8d
commit r9-9690-g04c568961e793a1d7ad86248b4ca929fc84acf8d
Author: Richard Earns
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102025
Bug ID: 102025
Summary: "COMMON_LVB_REVERSE_VIDEO" was not declared in this
scope (pretty-print.c) while compiling gcc 11.2.0
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
clang and clang++ on x86_64 ignore the zero width bitfields, so work similarly
to C++ in GCC < 12.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102012
--- Comment #2 from 康桓瑋 ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1)
> Hmm, I think this might actually be well-formed according to [temp.names]/9.
> I don't see why we'd need to check satisfaction of a concept-id inside
> decltype if its typ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024
Bug ID: 102024
Summary: zero width bitfields and ABIs
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101723
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f27d2ed875fbddfad1879ea8ea52ff531cb156dd
commit r10-10058-gf27d2ed875fbddfad1879ea8ea52ff531cb156dd
Author: Christophe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101723
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e4f82abde37887301ccd6959fef70926a994d56
commit r10-10057-g5e4f82abde37887301ccd6959fef70926a994d56
Author: Christophe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101723
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:02d5a1988247207da46f25ce8b58515e25c1f250
commit r10-10056-g02d5a1988247207da46f25ce8b58515e25c1f250
Author: Richard Ear
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97565
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97565
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0230e69a3fabe6ad1d80cdf308ad1bf1934c4381
commit r12-3085-g0230e69a3fabe6ad1d80cdf308ad1bf1934c4381
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101980
Ankur Saini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|dmalcolm at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102012
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101949
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] git |[11 Regression] git
|m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101949
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5bd4ab91660c8f5534c46979d4846a4f1a0972b0
commit r12-3083-g5bd4ab91660c8f5534c46979d4846a4f1a0972b0
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Mon
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
