[Bug c/33193] slopiness in __real/__imag

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33193 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/101762] ICE with "Every subscript of the target specification must be a constant expression"

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101762 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE in ix86_push_argument, |ICE with "Every subscript

[Bug c++/103783] Ambiguous overload between constrained static member and unconstrained non-static member

2022-01-01 Thread fchelnokov at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103783 Fedor Chelnokov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fchelnokov at gmail dot com ---

[Bug middle-end/29209] ICE optimizing passing long double to abstract method while in other abstract's impl

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29209 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/103888] New: ICE with global register definition after use

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103888 Bug ID: 103888 Summary: ICE with global register definition after use Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invalid, ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug lto/56532] valgrind errors with -flto

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56532 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- The only messages from valgrind I get these days are from IRA and LRA: ==15092== Command: ./cc1plus pr46984.C -O -fipa-cp -fno-early-inlining -flto -quiet --param=ggc-min-expand=0 --param=ggc-min-heapsize=0

[Bug c/103887] -fsanitize=shift affects constness of an expression

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103887 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Michal Kubecek from comment #4) > As this is nicer than the original code, I guess I'll use it and hope it is > not just a happy coincidence that it works. It is not, see

[Bug c/103887] -fsanitize=shift affects constness of an expression

2022-01-01 Thread mike--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103887 --- Comment #4 from Michal Kubecek --- It's probably even more complicated as #define ASSERT_ON_COMPILE_SELECTOR_SIZE(expr) \ _Static_assert( \

[Bug c/103887] -fsanitize=shift affects constness of an expression

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103887 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Michal Kubecek from comment #2) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > The problem is rather __builtin_constant_p not resolving to a constant. This > > is a dup of bug 79482. > >

[Bug c/103887] -fsanitize=shift affects constness of an expression

2022-01-01 Thread mike--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103887 --- Comment #2 from Michal Kubecek --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > The problem is rather __builtin_constant_p not resolving to a constant. This > is a dup of bug 79482. There is a difference: your modified testcase fails to

[Bug c/79482] _Static_assert(__builtin_constant_p(x)):

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79482 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@mk-sys.cz --- Comment #7 from

[Bug c/103887] -fsanitize=shift affects constness of an expression

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103887 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug target/99783] relocation truncated to fit: R_OR1K_GOT16 on OpenRISC, building libgeos

2022-01-01 Thread shorne at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99783 Stafford Horne changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/103887] New: -fsanitize=shift affects constness of an expression

2022-01-01 Thread mike--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103887 Bug ID: 103887 Summary: -fsanitize=shift affects constness of an expression Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libfortran/103886] Use 64-bit time_t on 32-bit glibc targets

2022-01-01 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103886 --- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > (In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #2) > > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > > Is there anything to be done as the time_t is now defaults

[Bug lto/50483] lto turns visibility from HIDDEN to DEFAULT

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50483 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Note I looked at both with and without the LTO plugin too to make sure it would work in both cases.

[Bug middle-end/102380] [meta-bug] visibility (fvisibility=* and attributes) issues

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102380 Bug 102380 depends on bug 50483, which changed state. Bug 50483 Summary: lto turns visibility from HIDDEN to DEFAULT https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50483 What|Removed |Added

[Bug lto/50483] lto turns visibility from HIDDEN to DEFAULT

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50483 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/103882] Register corruption in ASM only functions when optization is -O2/-Os/-O3

2022-01-01 Thread krystalgamer at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103882 Jose Silva changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |WONTFIX --- Comment #13 from Jose Silva

[Bug c++/92385] extremely long and memory intensive compilation for brace construction of array member

2022-01-01 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92385 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103390] [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed since r12-4591-g1af78e731feb9327

2022-01-01 Thread sandra at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103390 --- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 52107 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52107=edit -fdump-tree-original output from second test case Well, this is nuts. Unmodified code is generating 3

[Bug libfortran/103886] Use 64-bit time_t on 32-bit glibc targets

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103886 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #2) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > Is there anything to be done as the time_t is now defaults to 64bit on the > > trunk of glibc? > > AFAIU it's

[Bug libfortran/103886] Use 64-bit time_t on 32-bit glibc targets

2022-01-01 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103886 --- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Is there anything to be done as the time_t is now defaults to 64bit on the > trunk of glibc? AFAIU it's not the default, you need to explicitly opt-in by

[Bug c++/57208] Latest chromium compilation fails with enabled LTO

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208 Bug 57208 depends on bug 57703, which changed state. Bug 57703 Summary: Assembler function definition moved to a different ltrans then call https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57703 What|Removed

[Bug lto/46820] toplevel ASM statements being moved away from the functions in the TU

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46820 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mliska at suse dot cz --- Comment #14

[Bug lto/57703] Assembler function definition moved to a different ltrans then call

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57703 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/103886] Use 64-bit time_t on 32-bit glibc targets

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103886 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Is there anything to be done as the time_t is now defaults to 64bit on the trunk of glibc?

[Bug target/103882] Register corruption in ASM only functions when optization is -O2/-Os/-O3

2022-01-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103882 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- That is solely because you didn't write anything else in the function, try to put some code around the inline asm and you'll see how it will misbehave even with noipa attribute. Your code is invalid as

[Bug target/103882] Register corruption in ASM only functions when optization is -O2/-Os/-O3

2022-01-01 Thread schwab--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103882 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID

[Bug libfortran/103886] New: Use 64-bit time_t on 32-bit glibc targets

2022-01-01 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103886 Bug ID: 103886 Summary: Use 64-bit time_t on 32-bit glibc targets Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug target/103882] Register corruption in ASM only functions when optization is -O2/-Os/-O3

2022-01-01 Thread krystalgamer at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103882 Jose Silva changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |WONTFIX --- Comment #11 from Jose Silva

[Bug c++/103885] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in capturing lambda for certain constexpr/auto combination

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103885 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c++/103885] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in capturing lambda for certain constexpr/auto combination

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103885 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5

[Bug libstdc++/103879] error: accessing value of variant::_Copy_ctor_base through a 'const variant' glvalue in a constant expression

2022-01-01 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103879 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > clang rejects it also (with their libc++): Libc++ doesn't support constexpr std::string, and I think it's missing some DRs to std::variant as well. So I

[Bug target/103882] Register corruption in ASM only functions when optization is -O2/-Os/-O3

2022-01-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103882 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- That is just a total misunderstanding why the compiler needs to know (be told) the observable side-effects of the inline asm. Interprocedural optimizations are just one of the many reasons, much more

[Bug c++/103885] New: ICE in capturing lambda for certain constexpr/auto combination

2022-01-01 Thread cbcode at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103885 Bug ID: 103885 Summary: ICE in capturing lambda for certain constexpr/auto combination Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/103882] Register corruption in ASM only functions when optization is -O2/-Os/-O3

2022-01-01 Thread krystalgamer at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103882 --- Comment #9 from Jose Silva --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > The compiler has no idea either (it has intentionally no idea what the > inline asm does, it is a black box to the compiler), so that is why you need > to specify

[Bug modula2/93575] the modula2 frontend fails to build with a profiled bootstrap

2022-01-01 Thread gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93575 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/103882] Register corruption in ASM only functions when optization is -O2/-Os/-O3

2022-01-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103882 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- BTW, all this is documented in the gcc documentation (on Basic Asm and Extended Asm).

[Bug target/103882] Register corruption in ASM only functions when optization is -O2/-Os/-O3

2022-01-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103882 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jose Silva from comment #6) > Yes, noipa does help. > > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > > Oh that is because there is some IPA Register allocation going on. Anyways > > this is

[Bug target/103882] Register corruption in ASM only functions when optization is -O2/-Os/-O3

2022-01-01 Thread krystalgamer at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103882 --- Comment #6 from Jose Silva --- Yes, noipa does help. (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > Oh that is because there is some IPA Register allocation going on. Anyways > this is still not a bug. You need to mark a0 as a clobber in

[Bug lto/88643] -Wl,--wrap not supported with LTO

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88643 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|NEW

[Bug lto/49697] read permission of LTO intermediate files

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49697 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug lto/43786] ICE in lto_get_pickled_tree with fshort-double on one of the TUs

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43786 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- -fshort-enum or -funsigned-char/-fsigned-char might cause a smilar ICE. -fshort-double was removed in GCC 6 by r6-6819 (aka PR 60410 ).

[Bug middle-end/67452] [5/6 Regression] LTO ICE with -fopenmp-simd

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67452 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||evstupac at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug lto/66835] C++ openMP test failed after switching to C++14

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66835 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/67452] [5/6 Regression] LTO ICE with -fopenmp-simd

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67452 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||5.1.0, 5.2.0 Summary|LTO ICE

[Bug lto/88925] address of static string changes

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88925 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/103828] Type generated for CHARACTER(C_CHAR), VALUE arguments is wrong

2022-01-01 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103828 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/90087] Suboptimal codegen for x < 0 ? x - INT_MIN : x

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90087 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/84687] [8 Regression] error: invalid conversion in gimple call with -O3 and -ffast-math

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84687 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marcin.krotkiewski at gmail dot co

[Bug c/84903] internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:229

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84903 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/100283] [11/12 Regression] Call to MIN0 with integer(8) arguments raises an ICE

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100283 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||afernandez at odyhpc dot com ---

[Bug middle-end/100755] Error with fortran object (v11.1.0)

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100755 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/100183] Segmentation fault at runtime when passing an internal procedure as argument

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100183 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/100183] Segmentation fault at runtime when passing an internal procedure as argument

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100183 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW See Also|

[Bug target/99766] [11 Regression] ICE: unable to generate reloads with SVE code since r11-7807-gbe70bb5e

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99766 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/99787] [11 Regression] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133 since r11-7807-gbe70bb5e4babdf9d3d33e8f4658452038407fa8e

2022-01-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99787 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5fa4f982636e7e66eee6a9b45cc0939ae95b4659 commit r12-6164-g5fa4f982636e7e66eee6a9b45cc0939ae95b4659 Author: Andrew Pinski Date:

[Bug target/99766] [11 Regression] ICE: unable to generate reloads with SVE code since r11-7807-gbe70bb5e

2022-01-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99766 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5fa4f982636e7e66eee6a9b45cc0939ae95b4659 commit r12-6164-g5fa4f982636e7e66eee6a9b45cc0939ae95b4659 Author: Andrew Pinski Date:

[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133

2022-01-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5fa4f982636e7e66eee6a9b45cc0939ae95b4659 commit r12-6164-g5fa4f982636e7e66eee6a9b45cc0939ae95b4659 Author: Andrew Pinski Date:

[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133

2022-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill