https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107668
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107698
--- Comment #2 from Li Shaohua ---
I found a new test where gcc-O1 misses the global-buffer-overflow. Not sure if
these two have the same root cause:
% cat a.c
int a, c;
int *b = &a;
int main() {
int d = *b;
for (; c < 3; c++)
b = b + (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635
Milian Wolff changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mail at milianw dot de
--- Comment #69 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
--- Comment #3 from Xi Ruoyao ---
Created attachment 53907
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53907&action=edit
testcase
A more straightforward test (in C++).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #53907|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92706
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:985a8962712a56d1c9418cf05e1761f8bd20cf8f
commit r12-8913-g985a8962712a56d1c9418cf05e1761f8bd20cf8f
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107206
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:985a8962712a56d1c9418cf05e1761f8bd20cf8f
commit r12-8913-g985a8962712a56d1c9418cf05e1761f8bd20cf8f
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 107206, which changed state.
Bug 107206 Summary: Bogus -Wuninitialized in std::optional
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107206
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107206
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107660
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107645
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Max Filippov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:99c9cbcc3ba3e005bad790a600853266a81d95ee
commit r13-4086-g99c9cbcc3ba3e005bad790a600853266a81d95ee
Author: Max Filippov
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107704
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107645
jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107678
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107682
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107683
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107679
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|fortran |middle-end
Assignee|unassign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107714
Bug ID: 107714
Summary: MVE: Invalid addressing mode generated for VLD2
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107686
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107686
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107689
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107690
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107692
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107598
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107699
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107699
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|False positive |12/13 Regression] False
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87832
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexander Monakov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dd744f06c9952f92738b0860630085f0f0b99574
commit r13-4092-gdd744f06c9952f92738b0860630085f0f0b99574
Author: Alexander Monakov
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107676
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexander Monakov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:85966f0d20baf50a767ac1110f537395441604a9
commit r13-4094-g85966f0d20baf50a767ac1110f537395441604a9
Author: Alexander Monakov
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87832
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexander Monakov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4cc7a8c4a623b62dd0d486d7780d91b58eb6f1f
commit r13-4093-gd4cc7a8c4a623b62dd0d486d7780d91b58eb6f1f
Author: Alexander Monakov
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107676
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107624
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cf958f8f168f695d49e29297ef9fb37f6efa5d0f
commit r13-4095-gcf958f8f168f695d49e29297ef9fb37f6efa5d0f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107649
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e2c5510e001e5ccbde9e4b7df757e2bba2fdb00
commit r13-4096-g0e2c5510e001e5ccbde9e4b7df757e2bba2fdb00
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87832
--- Comment #6 from Alexander Monakov ---
With these patches on trunk, current situation is:
nm -CS -t d --defined-only gcc/insn-automata.o | sed 's/^[0-9]* 0*//' | sort -n
| tail -40
2496 r slm_base
2527 r bdver3_load_min_issue_delay
2746 r glm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107701
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec59848074ba8c4310cbadb603822bfaeff03a32
commit r13-4098-gec59848074ba8c4310cbadb603822bfaeff03a32
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107624
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107598
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107716
Bug ID: 107716
Summary: Getting negative values with NINT when using
doubleprecision values in range on i386
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107715
Bug ID: 107715
Summary: TSVC s161 for double runs at zen4 30 times slower when
vectorization is enabled
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107716
--- Comment #1 from urbanjost at comcast dot net ---
I am on a Linux mint box using KVM and
running a virtual box that is
OpenBSD mo.my.domain 7.2 GENERIC#381 i386
using
GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.2.0
and am getting negative values from NINT()
on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87832
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
> 53730 r btver2_fp_min_issue_delay
> 53760 r znver1_fp_transitions
> 93960 r bdver3_fp_transitions
> 106102 r lujiazui_core_check
> 106102 r lujiazui_core_transitions
> 196123 r lujiazui_core_min_issue_delay
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107701
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87832
--- Comment #8 from Alexander Monakov ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #7)
> > 53730 r btver2_fp_min_issue_delay
> > 53760 r znver1_fp_transitions
> > 93960 r bdver3_fp_transitions
> > 106102 r lujiazui_core_check
> > 106102 r lujiazui_c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107705
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107703
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
aarch64 isn't affected (yet), the __bf16 arithmetics support patch has just
been posted but not reviewed. So, on arm and aarch64 __bf16 is a store only
type one can't convert to/from nor use in unary/binary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107711
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks for filing this bug report.
Unfortunately I can't reproduce the ICE with the attachment.
I have a suspicion that this relates to commits r13-4073-gd8aba860b34203 and/or
r13-4074-g86a90006864840 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107709
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107699
--- Comment #2 from Carlos Galvez ---
Looking deeply at the stacktrace, I see that std::sort ends up in this kind of
code:
if (__last - __first > int(_S_threshold))
{
std::__insertion_sort(__first, __first + int(_S_thres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107715
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Because store data races are allowed with -Ofast masked stores are not used so
we instead get
vect__ifc__80.24_114 = VEC_COND_EXPR ;
_ifc__80 = _58 ? _45 : _ifc__78;
MEM [(double *)vectp_c.25_116] =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107709
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> IVOPTs is usually quite careful with this and the infer of non-NULL from
> ptr + CST is new - that introduced a new undefinedness in GIMPLE. The
> workaround
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107717
Bug ID: 107717
Summary: [13 Regression] ICEs expanding permutes after
g:dc95e1e9702f2f6367bbc108c8d01169be1b66d2
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107711
--- Comment #2 from urs at akk dot org ---
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 02:41:40PM +, dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Unfortunately I can't reproduce the ICE with the attachment.
Yes, attachment was created with "-v -save-temps -freport-bug"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107715
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107715
>
> --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
> Because store data races are allowed with -Ofast masked stores are not used so
> we instead get
>
> vect_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87832
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
>
> Do you mean we should fix modeling of divisions there as well? I don't have
> latency/throughput measurements for those CPUs, nor access so I can run
> experiments myself, unfortunately.
>
> I guess you m
>
> Do you mean we should fix modeling of divisions there as well? I don't have
> latency/throughput measurements for those CPUs, nor access so I can run
> experiments myself, unfortunately.
>
> I guess you mean just making a patch to model division units separately,
> leaving latency/throughput
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107715
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov ---
There's a forward dependency over 'c' (read of c[i] vs. write of c[i+1] with
'i' iterating forward), and the vectorized variant takes the hit on each
iteration. How is a slowdown even surprising.
For th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78655
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107711
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 53911
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53911&action=edit
Work-in-progress patch to add logging to ana::on_finish_translation_unit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107717
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tnfchris at gcc dot
gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107714
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Bracey ---
Looking at that assembly output from Compiler Explorer, I'm also at a loss as
to what happened to the "6" for the VMUL. Maybe something else to look at?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107711
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to urs from comment #2)
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 02:41:40PM +, dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > Unfortunately I can't reproduce the ICE with the attachment.
>
> Yes, attachment was crea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107714
Kevin Bracey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stammark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101491
--- Comment #12 from Lorenzo Salvadore
---
I have sent by mail an alternative patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/jit/2022q4/001572.html
It should be functionally equivalent to John's patch, but it is written with a
different style. It is the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107679
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a5f3663f8de45b7030dfe7ce962783dc1a19885
commit r13-4101-g8a5f3663f8de45b7030dfe7ce962783dc1a19885
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107686
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:246bbdaa5f536b7a199dda9860c473137f40d622
commit r13-4102-g246bbdaa5f536b7a199dda9860c473137f40d622
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107716
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107709
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod ---
we might be able to provide a lightweight ranger based query to determine if an
ssa_name is non-null in a block.. in fact.. we may not need anything special.
/* Create a new ranger instance and associate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Bracey ---
I've just spotted another apparent generic selection problem in my reproducer
for bug 107714 - should I create a new issue for it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107310
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99408
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
This also reproduces with zen4 and double.
jh@alberti:~/tsvc/bin> cat tt.c
typedef double real_t;
#define iterations 10
#define LEN_1D 32000
#define LEN_2D 256
real_t a[LEN_1D],b[LEN_1D],c[LEN_1D],d[LEN_1D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107718
Bug ID: 107718
Summary: clang optimizes TSVC s317 a lot better
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87832
--- Comment #10 from Alexander Monakov ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #9)
> Actually for older cores I think the manufacturers do not care much. I
> still have a working Bulldozer machine and I can do some testing.
> I think in Buldoz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99411
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
With znver4 current trunk and clang15 I still see this problem (clang code is
about 60% faster) for s311, s312 and s3111.
Curious s3 and s3110 no longer shows a regression.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107715
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|TSVC s161 for double runs |TSVC s161 and s277 for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107719
Bug ID: 107719
Summary: 14% regression on TSVC s3113 on znve4 compared to GCC
7.5
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107719
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107720
Bug ID: 107720
Summary: [13 regression] New C++ library test cases (and many
others) in r13-3936-g1d9454aba615ea fail
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106602
--- Comment #24 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Just a note. Raphael and I are going to poke at this from a different
direction.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106602
--- Comment #25 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
To outline what we were thinking. Yes, it's possible that 4->3 combinations
aren't supported. I'd have to sit down with the combine sources to be sure.
So the alternate approach we came up with was to m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107720
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107721
Bug ID: 107721
Summary: Lost typespec with constant expressions using array
constructors and parentheses
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107722
Bug ID: 107722
Summary: Boostrap failure for some locales starting with
r13-4070
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107723
Bug ID: 107723
Summary: RISC-V lround/ceil/floor with
-fno-fp-int-builtin-inexact
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107722
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107711
--- Comment #5 from urs at akk dot org ---
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 03:54:54PM +, dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> If you're familiar with gdb, would you be able to reproduce the crasher under
> gdb, by adding:
> -wrapper gdb,--args
> to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107722
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107711
--- Comment #6 from urs at akk dot org ---
Created attachment 53913
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53913&action=edit
head of fanalyzer-dump with patch from 53911
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107723
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|RISC-V lround/ceil/floor|lround/ceil/floor with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107724
Bug ID: 107724
Summary: __builtin_{l,ll}floor* and __builtin_{l,ll}ceil* are
not documented
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107723
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm, only lround is documented and the other two are not, I filed PR 107724 for
the missing documentation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107722
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This might fix/improve that:
> diff --git a/gcc/diagnostic.cc b/gcc/diagnostic.cc
> index 22f7b0b6d6e..5764ce672ec 100644
> --- a/gcc/diagnostic.cc
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-11-16
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107680
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:713dcfc85ebbabaf74a1bcbac4ba1143519b31d6
commit r13-4106-g713dcfc85ebbabaf74a1bcbac4ba1143519b31d6
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107725
Bug ID: 107725
Summary: Spurious warning: use of uninitialized value with
std::any
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107725
--- Comment #1 from Chris Uzdavinis ---
I get a similar warning with this code. Unsure if it's the same underlying
issue. Also does not warn with g++10 or g++11, but does with newer versions.
#include
#include
std::string create() {
st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107681
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:96e4244ef3ccf4867ca4e37fbc6800e64ef30af6
commit r13-4107-g96e4244ef3ccf4867ca4e37fbc6800e64ef30af6
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107723
--- Comment #3 from Kevin Lee ---
aarch64 also produces
ceil1:
fcvtps x0, d0
ret
Since it has been changed to middle-end, I'll delete riscv as the target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107720
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #0)
> g:1d9454aba615eadd0d85c93713dd848227345f67, r13-3936-g1d9454aba615ea
>
> This was on a make check of a simple (non-bootstrap) built compiler. I only
> see this on o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107681
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107659
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo