[Bug testsuite/42348] Syntax of dg-skip-if in two obj-c++ tests

2009-12-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #4 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-12-14 16:47 --- there are several problems: 1/ the target-supports tests fail if called with ObjC/ObjC++ specific flags (e.g. -fgnu-runtime). 2/ there is no specific target-supports test for OBJC2 (which is needed

[Bug testsuite/42348] Syntax of dg-skip-if in two obj-c++ tests

2009-12-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #5 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-12-14 16:50 --- Created an attachment (id=19290) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19290&action=view) add support for ObjC/ObjC++ and an effective target OBJ2 test when -fnext-runtime, -fgnu-

[Bug testsuite/42348] Syntax of dg-skip-if in two obj-c++ tests

2009-12-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #6 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-12-14 16:54 --- Created an attachment (id=19291) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19291&action=view) changes to recognize correctly which ObjC runtime is in use this (a) tracks the -fgnu-

[Bug testsuite/42348] Syntax of dg-skip-if in two obj-c++ tests

2009-12-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #7 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-12-14 16:56 --- Created an attachment (id=19292) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19292&action=view) changes to recognize correctly which ObjC runtime is in use this (a) tracks the -fgnu-

[Bug testsuite/42348] Syntax of dg-skip-if in two obj-c++ tests

2009-12-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #8 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-12-14 16:59 --- with the patches above; testsuite/obj-c++.dg/const-str-9.mm should have: /* { dg-do compile { target *-*-darwin* } } */ /* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-darwin* } { "-fgnu-runtime" } { &q

[Bug target/41473] [4.5 Regression] dsymutil "Assertion failed ..."

2009-12-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #98 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-12-14 18:31 --- i686-apple-darwin9 bootstraps without dsymutil fails at 155225, thanks Jakub. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41473

[Bug bootstrap/42400] New: objc build fails

2009-12-17 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu, i686-apple-darwin GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu, i686-apple-darwin GCC target triplet: i686-pc

[Bug bootstrap/42400] objc build fails

2009-12-17 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #2 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-12-17 11:30 --- Created an attachment (id=19337) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19337&action=view) apply the new ref_operator to objc-act.c this is a mechanical change to the file, boots

[Bug c++/41596] handling of library-related options by g++spec.c causes a failure when generating pch.

2009-12-17 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #2 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-12-17 19:51 --- Created an attachment (id=19339) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19339&action=view) updated patch to allow specification of -static-libstdc++ on the CL while generat

[Bug c++/41596] handling of library-related options by g++spec.c causes a failure when generating pch.

2009-12-17 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #3 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-12-17 19:54 --- the patch has been modified following the discussions in: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg00862.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg00855.html to re-write "-static-li

[Bug bootstrap/42424] New: in-tree GMP/MPFR/MPC bootstrap fails.

2009-12-18 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
ndoe-acoustics dot co dot uk GCC build triplet: *-apple-darwin9, i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: *-apple-darwin9, i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: *-apple-darwin9, i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42424

[Bug objc/35165] Massive failures of objc on i686-apple-darwin9

2009-12-23 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #6 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-12-23 15:04 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg01081.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35165

[Bug target/41605] Static linking of libgcc/libgfortran/libstdc++ can cause inconsistent symbol resolution.

2009-12-31 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #10 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-12-31 17:07 --- (In reply to comment #9) > FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/recursion1.f90 -Os execution test There are two problems: 1) there is a problem with specifying -fopenmp twice on the CL gfortran.dg/g

[Bug bootstrap/42424] in-tree GMP/MPFR/MPC bootstrap fails

2010-01-02 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #2 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-01-02 16:41 --- (In reply to comment #1) > I was able to do a C-only bootstrap of mainline with all three libraries > in-tree on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. I used mpc-0.8, mpfr-2.4.2, gmp-4.3.1 > and ...

[Bug target/41605] Static linking of libgcc/libgfortran/libstdc++ can cause inconsistent symbol resolution.

2010-01-04 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #14 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-01-04 11:49 --- (In reply to comment #13) > Is this bug now fixed? AFAICT, yes - comment #9 is not the result of this patch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41605

[Bug bootstrap/42842] New: missing "_MOVE_RATIO"

2010-01-22 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk GCC build triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin9 GCC host triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin9 GCC target triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin9 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42842

[Bug target/41605] Static linking of libgcc/libgfortran/libstdc++ can cause inconsistent symbol resolution.

2010-01-22 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #15 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-01-22 09:38 --- successful tests on darwin8/darwin9 and no further reported issues. -- developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/41446] in-tree GMP/MPFR requires c++ as stage 1 lang; 2 object compares fail.

2010-01-22 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #1 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-01-22 09:42 --- this has been resolved without any specific action - presumably as a byproduct of fixing other issues. -- developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk changed: What|Removed

[Bug other/39888] TLS emutls not linked to automatically on Darwin

2010-01-22 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #63 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-01-22 09:59 --- this is fixed AFAIK. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39888

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #1 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 13:46 --- confirmed, this can be reproduced outside the testsuite framework: for example... [ppc/darwin9/156749]; $ ./gcc/xgcc -B gcc ../gcc-4-5-trunk/gcc/testsuite/objc/execute/cascading-1.m -fnext-runtime -O1

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #3 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 16:04 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Track down the regression that caused this r156519 >and see what actually is the difference in generated code and/or tree/rtl >dumps. what output would be

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #5 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 16:32 --- Created an attachment (id=19860) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19860&action=view) generated asm differences with/without r156519 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #6 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 16:33 --- Created an attachment (id=19861) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19861&action=view) optimized tree diffs. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43061

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #7 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 16:45 --- Created an attachment (id=19862) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19862&action=view) diffs for all fdump-tree-all output -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43061

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #9 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 18:50 --- (In reply to comment #8) > Hm. So CCP through get_symbol_constant_value causes > you run the compile inside gdb, break on get_symbol_constant_value maybe I've messed something up - bu

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #13 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 21:13 --- Created an attachment (id=19864) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19864&action=view) gdb-output for CLASS_REFERENCES_0 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43061

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #15 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 21:53 --- (In reply to comment #14) > That doesn't make sense. The symbol is not TREE_READONLY. > > Was that dump from inside get_symbol_constant_value? yes. that was from a clean bootstrap o

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #16 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 21:55 --- Created an attachment (id=19866) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19866&action=view) gimple for cascading-1.m @ trunk 156760 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #18 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 22:11 --- Created an attachment (id=19867) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19867&action=view) -fdump-ipa-all/static-var cascading-1.m @ trunk 156760 this is with normal options (i

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #19 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 22:16 --- Created an attachment (id=19868) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19868&action=view) cascading-1.m/-fdump-ipa-all/pure-const @ trunk 15670 this is with -fno-ipa-re

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #21 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 23:22 --- Created an attachment (id=19870) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19870&action=view) asm out from -O1 -g cascading-1.m @trunk 156760 this is the current asm output - it se

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #23 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 23:57 --- (In reply to comment #22) > There are no modifications visible in the assembly. But there is magic: > > .objc_cls_refs > .align 2 > L_OBJC_CLASS_REFERENCES_0:

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-15 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #25 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-15 19:54 --- Hm. I tried this trivial patch: Index: gcc/objc/objc-act.c === --- gcc/objc/objc-act.c (revision 156760) +++ gcc/objc/objc-act.c

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-15 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #27 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-15 21:51 --- (In reply to comment #26) > Addressability is recomputed several times. What you probably want is mark > the > decl with the used attribute (i.e. add "used" attribute to it, se

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-15 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #29 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-15 23:10 --- Created an attachment (id=19884) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19884&action=view) attach "used" attribute as well as marking vars used. Jakub's comment

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-16 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #30 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-16 09:23 --- apropos http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00587.html do you think that _OBJC_CLASS_REFERENCES_* and _OBJC_SELECTOR_REFERENCES_* should be marked as TREE_ADDRESSABLE and DECL_PRESERVE_P in

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-16 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #34 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-16 14:58 --- Created an attachment (id=19889) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19889&action=view) patch with CLASS and SELECTOR refs. marked as TREE_ADDRESSABLE & DECL_PRESERVE_

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-19 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #37 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-19 08:43 --- (In reply to comment #36) > I've checked in a slightly updated fix in r156877. Let us know if all the > regressions are fixed now. i686/powerpc-darwin9 - YES, thanks. -- http://

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-19 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #40 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-19 23:28 --- (In reply to comment #39) > I checked in the real back end change in r156907. OK on i686/powerpc d9 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43061

[Bug testsuite/41609] Torture tests do not check "trivial.{m,mm}" for each run case.

2010-02-19 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #2 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-19 23:32 --- Created an attachment (id=19926) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19926&action=view) updated patch against 156812 gcc/testsuite/Changelog: 2009-10-06 Iain Sandoe PR tes

[Bug testsuite/42348] Syntax of dg-skip-if in two obj-c++ tests

2010-02-19 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #9 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-19 23:36 --- Created an attachment (id=19927) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19927&action=view) updated patch against 156812 gcc/testsuite/Changelog: 2009-12-17 Iain Sandoe PR te

[Bug objc/35165] Massive failures of objc on i686-apple-darwin9

2010-02-19 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #7 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-19 23:42 --- updated patches & test results: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00742.html explanation of the intention of those patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00712.

[Bug bootstrap/43287] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails at stage 1 on powerpc-apple-darwin9

2010-03-09 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #14 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-09 08:54 --- (In reply to comment #12) > Bootstrapping all languages minus ADA with the patch in comment #10 succeeded > at revision 157293. at 157294 (minus ada and java) with the patch. I see the followi

[Bug fortran/43481] New: huge object files generated for un-initialized data

2010-03-22 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
ReportedBy: developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk GCC target triplet: *-apple-darwin* http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43481

[Bug fortran/43481] huge object files generated for un-initialized data

2010-03-22 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #1 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-22 16:18 --- Created an attachment (id=20160) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20160&action=view) reduced testcase this compiles to an 7.6Mb object on current trunk. -- http://gcc.

[Bug fortran/43481] huge object files generated for un-initialized data

2010-03-22 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #2 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-22 16:21 --- Created an attachment (id=20161) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20161&action=view) provisional fix against 157594 this is plagiarized in its entirety from apple/llvm 4

[Bug target/43481] huge object files generated for un-initialized data

2010-03-22 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #4 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-22 16:59 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Also, unless "turley" has a copyright assignment on file with the FSF (didn't > find him/her in the MAINTAINERS file), the patch unfortunately cannot

[Bug target/43481] huge object files generated for un-initialized data

2010-03-22 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #5 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-22 18:55 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Also, unless "turley" has a copyright assignment on file with the FSF (didn't > find him/her in the MAINTAINERS file), the patch unfortunately cannot be

[Bug target/33120] Data not put in BSS section on Mac OS

2010-03-24 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #15 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-24 17:39 --- (In reply to comment #14) > Note that there was no libjava test failure with the patch in > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-03/txt7.txt . Also with this patch the > test in comment #

[Bug testsuite/43512] [4.5 regression] Many objc test failures

2010-03-25 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #1 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-25 09:04 --- (In reply to comment #0) > On Linux/ia32, revision 157716 gave: > > Revision 157712 is OK. Those checkins: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-03/msg00552.html > http://gcc.

[Bug testsuite/43512] [4.5 regression] Many objc test failures

2010-03-25 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #3 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-25 20:03 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Iain, these tests pass if the tests are run after "make install" because then > the objc header files are found in the install tree. I tested your patch

[Bug testsuite/43512] [4.5 regression] Many objc test failures

2010-03-25 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #4 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-25 21:40 --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > It's a source of potentially very subtle problems... > (at least, that is my understanding of the situation). I should add that

[Bug testsuite/43512] [4.5 regression] Many objc test failures

2010-03-26 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #8 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-26 07:47 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Why > > --- > Propchange: trunk/gcc/testsuite/objc-obj-c++-shared/Object1-implementation.h > ('svn:executable' added) > > Propc

[Bug testsuite/43512] [4.5 regression] Many objc test failures

2010-03-26 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #9 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-26 08:09 --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > Why my first reply was rubbish (should have coffee before email). This is clearly an error on my part - in fact, looking at my t

[Bug objc/43535] ICE on objc.dg/objc-gc-4.m -fgnu-runtime

2010-03-26 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #1 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-26 12:16 --- I believe that this test was not previously carried out with "-fgnu-runtime" . So, technically I think it's a failed New test rather than a regression (but I will triple-check a little

[Bug objc/35165] Massive failures of objc on i686-apple-darwin9

2010-03-26 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #11 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-26 13:42 --- (In reply to comment #9) > Should I close this PR as fixed, leaving people fill new PRs for the remaining > failures, or should I leave it open? IMO this should be closed - it clears the fault

[Bug objc/35165] Massive failures of objc on i686-apple-darwin9

2010-03-26 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #12 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-26 13:42 --- (In reply to comment #10) > Is there any plan to backport the patches to 4.4? I'll look at that in the next couple of weeks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35165

[Bug testsuite/41609] Torture tests do not check "trivial.{m,mm}" for each run case.

2010-03-26 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #4 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-26 13:48 --- I think this is now OK following the patches and no new issues appear to have arisen elsewhere. -- developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk changed: What|Removed

[Bug objc/43535] ICE on objc.dg/objc-gc-4.m -fgnu-runtime

2010-03-26 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #4 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-26 16:36 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Subject: Re: ICE on objc.dg/objc-gc-4.m -fgnu-runtime > This option should not be supported or a nop there. if gc is incompatible with gnu runtime then that sho

[Bug objc/35996] ICE while building simple ObjC code with -fobjc-gc

2010-03-26 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #5 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-26 18:20 --- Created an attachment (id=20215) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20215&action=view) warn that -fobjc-gc is ignored for -fgnu-runtime and set flag_objc_gc to 0 a warnin

[Bug objc++/23716] obj-c++.dg/comp-types-10.mm ICE with the GNU runtime

2010-03-26 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #9 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-26 20:09 --- also fails on *-*-darwin* with -fgnu-runtime. -- developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug objc++/23716] obj-c++.dg/comp-types-10.mm ICE with the GNU runtime

2010-03-26 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #10 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-26 21:44 --- (In reply to comment #9) > also fails on *-*-darwin* with -fgnu-runtime. note the fail does not occur (at least on ppc darwin) with -O0 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23716

[Bug objc++/23716] obj-c++.dg/comp-types-10.mm ICE with the GNU runtime

2010-03-27 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #11 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-27 11:59 --- It seems that objc_start_function is expecting a TREE in the objcpp case - so the error marked node is indeed unexpected. I've tried this on i686-darwin and i32-linux - but there are obviously

[Bug objc++/23613] obj-c++.dg/isa-field-1.mm fails with the GNU runtime

2010-03-27 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #7 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-27 13:10 --- see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg01282.html hopefully, that's a reasonable way to fix. -- developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk changed: What|Re

[Bug objc++/27249] FAIL: obj-c++.dg/encode-8.mm execution test

2010-03-27 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #4 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-27 14:38 --- shouldn't this be NeXT-specific - i.e. skipped for -fgnu-runtime, rather than XFAILED? -- developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk changed: What|Re

[Bug bootstrap/40950] Bootstrap fails with in-tree gmp and without system C++ compiler

2009-08-25 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #9 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-08-25 12:06 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Use --enable-stage1-languages=c,c++ I believe that this bug also applies to powerpc-apple-darwin8 and i686-apple-darwin9. the suggested remedy also works. This

[Bug bootstrap/41224] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin9 at revision 151318

2009-09-04 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #19 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-04 08:36 --- this also applies to powerpc-apple-darwin8 at least at 151409 -- developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/41224] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin9 at revision 151318

2009-09-04 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #21 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-04 16:27 --- (In reply to comment #20) > > this also applies to powerpc-apple-darwin8 at least at 151409 > > This should be fixed now (try r151388 or newer, see pr41237). i686-apple-darwin9 appea

[Bug bootstrap/41224] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin9 at revision 151318

2009-09-04 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #24 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-04 17:00 --- (In reply to comment #22 & #23) > When you run ./config ..., you should see > > rm: conftest.dSYM: is a directory > checking for default BUILD_CONFIG... conftest.o.g0.stripped > co

[Bug bootstrap/41224] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin9 at revision 151318

2009-09-04 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #27 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-04 19:38 --- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #25) > > Fixed with revision 151367. this is true for powerpc-apple-darwin9 (which is the mentioned system in the bug) it is NOT fixed fo

[Bug bootstrap/41296] New: bootstrap fails with --with-dwarf2 trunk at 151455

2009-09-07 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
t sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk GCC build triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin8 GCC host triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin8 GCC target triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin8 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41296

[Bug bootstrap/41296] bootstrap fails with --with-dwarf2 trunk at 151455

2009-09-07 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #1 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-07 13:32 --- Created an attachment (id=18529) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18529&action=view) patch allowing compare-debug to work with dwarf mach-o this is needed to allow any mea

[Bug bootstrap/41245] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on I386-apple-darwin9 at revision 151373

2009-09-07 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #5 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-07 13:49 --- does this help? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg00467.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41245

[Bug bootstrap/41245] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on I386-apple-darwin9 at revision 151373

2009-09-08 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #8 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-08 07:09 --- (In reply to comment #6) > I believe Mike Stump told me that it is possible that darwin's strip could > re-order the sections. Is that possibility addressed in the current patches? I don&#

[Bug bootstrap/41245] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on I386-apple-darwin9 at revision 151373

2009-09-08 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #9 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-08 08:54 --- Created an attachment (id=18538) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18538&action=view) patch allowing compare-debug to work with dwarf mach-o this works for powerpc-apple-

[Bug bootstrap/41296] bootstrap fails with --with-dwarf2 trunk at 151455

2009-09-08 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #3 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-08 08:49 --- (In reply to comment #0) > the difference appears to be the cmd LC_UUID in the stage3 object. > > In all probability this is harmless? > but I've yet to find a way to strip that load

[Bug bootstrap/41296] bootstrap fails with --with-dwarf2 trunk at 151455

2009-09-08 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #2 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-08 08:48 --- Created an attachment (id=18537) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18537&action=view) revised patch adds the -no_uuid flag which is needed by powerpc darwin8 for dwarf

[Bug bootstrap/41245] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on I386-apple-darwin9 at revision 151373

2009-09-08 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #14 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-08 14:44 --- (In reply to comment #13) > I'm doing x86_64-apple-darwin9 now - so no need to include that tonight - I > can > confirm that this also needs the patch to configure with the tes

[Bug bootstrap/41245] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on I386-apple-darwin9 at revision 151373

2009-09-08 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #11 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-08 13:40 --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > Created an attachment (id=18538) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18538&action=view) [edit] >

[Bug bootstrap/41245] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on I386-apple-darwin9 at revision 151373

2009-09-08 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #13 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-08 14:07 --- (In reply to comment #12) > I am confused then. Don't we need another patch beyond the one in > cmpdbg-1.diff.txt to re-enable the compare-debug function on darwin? the default BUILD_CONF

[Bug bootstrap/41245] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on I386-apple-darwin9 at revision 151373

2009-09-18 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #19 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-18 12:56 --- (In reply to comment #18) > Fixed or what? Yes at 151650 (for example) on i686-apple-darwin9 (current trunk, 151837, appears to have a different problem). Also OK on powerpc-apple-darw

[Bug bootstrap/41296] bootstrap fails with --with-dwarf2 trunk at 151455

2009-09-18 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #4 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-18 12:58 --- FIXED as of 151837. -- developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/41395] [4.5 regression] Revision 151800 failed bootstrap

2009-09-18 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #10 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-18 19:08 --- on i686-apple-darwin9 bootstrap fails with a variety of different errors depending on what --enable-checking=xx is set. For =yes if fails with a lot of dsymutil crashes. =runtime it fails per the

[Bug bootstrap/41395] [4.5 regression] Revision 151800 failed bootstrap

2009-09-19 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #15 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-19 22:45 --- just checked; powerpc-apple-darwin9 [at 151880] this also fails. looking through the error log there do seem to be a large number of garbage strings in the informational messages; e.g. ../../../gcc-4

[Bug bootstrap/41405] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails at revision 151873 on *-apple-darwin9

2009-09-20 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #11 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-20 08:00 --- see my comment #10 on PR41395 and note that this bug also shows on powerpc-apple-darwin9. It DOES NOT show on powerpc-apple-darwin8 (which makes one less sure about the likelihood of a straight

[Bug bootstrap/41405] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails at revision 151873 on *-apple-darwin9

2009-09-20 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #12 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-20 09:38 --- (In reply to comment #11) > see my comment #10 on PR41395 and note that this bug also shows on > powerpc-apple-darwin9. > It DOES NOT show on powerpc-apple-darwin8 (which makes one less sure

[Bug bootstrap/41395] [4.5 regression] Revision 151800 failed bootstrap

2009-09-20 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #19 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-20 09:42 --- applying http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg01274.html causes i686-apple-darwin9 to fail with the (long long) fault for all --enable-checking=xx I've tried. Thus, that fault seems sep

[Bug bootstrap/41405] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails at revision 151873 on *-apple-darwin9

2009-09-20 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #19 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-20 22:37 --- (In reply to comment #16) firstly, backing out of all mods to dwarf2out.c after 151814 both allows the bootstrap to complete and checking the log files shows no dsymutil fails powerpc-apple-darwin8

[Bug bootstrap/41405] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 151815

2009-09-21 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #22 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-21 09:04 --- Dominique has confirmed what I've found, that some changes beyond 151814->151815 are also significant. test results for powerpc-apple-darwin8 and i686-apple-darwin9 http://gcc.gnu.or

[Bug bootstrap/41405] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 151815

2009-09-21 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #25 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-21 12:45 --- (In reply to comment #23) > Created an attachment (id=18621) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18621&action=view) [edit] > gcc45-pr41405.patch thanks for the patch. I

[Bug bootstrap/41405] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 151815

2009-09-21 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #26 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-21 14:24 --- (In reply to comment #23) > Created an attachment (id=18621) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18621&action=view) [edit] > gcc45-pr41405.patch as pre previous c

[Bug bootstrap/41405] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 151815

2009-09-21 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #28 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-21 16:46 --- (In reply to comment #27) > I believe I've caught all DW_OP_{implicit,stack}_value uses in dwarf2out.c, so > likely -gstrict-dwarf wasn't used when compiling something that has been

[Bug bootstrap/41405] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 151815

2009-09-21 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #31 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-21 18:50 --- OK. this is what I've done (a) bootstrapped with Jakub's path but modified thus >> Common Report Var(dwarf_strict) Init(1) - bootstrap succeeds (with the four errors mentioned in #

[Bug bootstrap/41405] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 151815

2009-09-22 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #34 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-22 14:36 --- (In reply to comment #32) > Updated patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg01477.html thanks - actually I was trying this - but in the end updated to 151978... with BOOT_CFLAGS=

[Bug bootstrap/41405] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 151815

2009-09-22 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #37 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-22 16:09 --- (In reply to comment #36) > Remove -gdwarf-2 as well. -gdwarf-2 is the same as -g when dwarf_version > defaults to 2 (which is true on the trunk). > Easiest quick hack to turn -gstrict-dw

[Bug bootstrap/41405] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 151815

2009-09-22 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #38 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-22 16:38 --- > Comparing stages 2 and 3 > warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs > warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs > warning: gcc/cc1objplus-checksum.o differs > warning: gcc/cc1plus-che

[Bug other/39888] TLS emutls not linked to automatically on Darwin

2009-09-22 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #7 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-22 19:20 --- (In reply to comment #6) > I wonder if we could just trim out the symbols from libgcc that are in > libSystem, and arrange for gcc's installed libgcc to be found first. OK. If I understan

[Bug bootstrap/41405] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 151815

2009-09-22 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #39 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-22 20:17 --- object differences currently causing bootstrap fail - these look unrelated to the original bug: .. anyone throw any light on this? stripped future.o from stage 2 07e0 63 5f 5f 5f 76 33 5f 73 72

[Bug bootstrap/41405] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 151815

2009-09-22 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #43 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-22 21:42 --- (In reply to comment #42) > Are you building with --enable-build-with-cxx or something similar? > libstdc++-v3 isn't normally compared. The difference you are seeing is likely > relate

[Bug bootstrap/41405] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 151815

2009-09-23 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #48 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-23 09:13 --- (In reply to comment #43) > (In reply to comment #42) > > Are you building with --enable-build-with-cxx or something similar? confirmed. building with: out-of-tree gmp/mpfr and --enab

  1   2   >