--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-20 14:41 ---
Btw, if comment #0 is correct, then the test case 'interface_21.f90' is wrong
(that is: the test case itself is legal, but the dg-error is wrong). It was
added by Jerry DeLisle in r129799, in connection with PR33162
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-20 15:17 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Btw, if comment #0 is correct, then the test case 'interface_21.f90' is wrong
Same goes for proc_decl_8.f90.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39850
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-19 08:11 ---
Subject: Bug 40450
Author: janus
Date: Fri Jun 19 08:11:21 2009
New Revision: 148690
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=148690
Log:
2009-06-19 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-19 08:16 ---
Fixed with r148690. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||39627
nThis
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-18 08:09 ---
Subject: Bug 40451
Author: janus
Date: Thu Jun 18 08:09:40 2009
New Revision: 148652
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=148652
Log:
2009-06-18 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-18 08:13 ---
Fixed with r148652. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-18 20:27 ---
Here is a preliminary patch which fixes the test case:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c(revision 148651)
+++ gcc
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-17 08:33 ---
The test case is also rejected without being inside a module:
contains
function f()
intrinsic :: sin
procedure(sin), pointer :: f
f = sin
end function f
end
However, if the 'contains' is removed
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-17 08:54 ---
The error also goes away if 'implicit none' is inserted.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-17 09:26 ---
Mine. Here's a patch:
Index: gcc/fortran/symbol.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/symbol.c(revision 148518)
+++ gcc/fortran/symbol.c(working copy
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-16 09:06 ---
Subject: Bug 40039
Author: janus
Date: Tue Jun 16 09:06:13 2009
New Revision: 148519
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=148519
Log:
2009-06-16 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-16 09:06 ---
Subject: Bug 36947
Author: janus
Date: Tue Jun 16 09:06:13 2009
New Revision: 148519
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=148519
Log:
2009-06-16 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-16 09:14 ---
From the ToDo items in comment #7, r148519 fixes the first two (check for
optional and better error messages). The remaining item (recursive check) is
tracked by PR 40453, so I think this PR can be closed
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-16 09:17 ---
r148519 improves the error messages (besides adding a check for optional), so
the remaining ToDo item for this PR is: Fixing the intents of non-std
intrinsics (which are currently all intent(in)).
--
http
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40450
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40427
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-12 20:39 ---
Subject: Bug 40176
Author: janus
Date: Fri Jun 12 20:39:39 2009
New Revision: 148440
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=148440
Log:
2009-06-12 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-12 20:45 ---
The remaining issue from comment #5 has been fixed with the commit in comment
#7. So this can be closed.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-25 14:48 ---
Subject: Bug 40176
Author: janus
Date: Mon May 25 14:48:24 2009
New Revision: 147850
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147850
Log:
2009-05-25 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-18 09:19 ---
Subject: Bug 36947
Author: janus
Date: Mon May 18 09:19:20 2009
New Revision: 147655
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147655
Log:
2009-05-18 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-18 09:19 ---
Subject: Bug 40039
Author: janus
Date: Mon May 18 09:19:20 2009
New Revision: 147655
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147655
Log:
2009-05-18 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-18 09:28 ---
The commit in comment #4 implements the basic checking of the intents.
ToDo:
* Improve the error message, which is currently just Type/rank mismatch in
argument Should specify exactly what is not matching
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-18 09:36 ---
The commit in comment #6 implements the checking for intents.
ToDo:
* check for OPTIONAL
* better error messages
* recursive check (see comment #2)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36947
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-18 12:28 ---
This test case with 'dynamic' array size produces a gimplification error:
PROGRAM test_prog
ABSTRACT INTERFACE
FUNCTION fn_template(n,x) RESULT(y)
INTEGER, INTENT(in) :: n
REAL, INTENT(in) :: x(n)
REAL
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-18 14:45 ---
Subject: Bug 40164
Author: janus
Date: Mon May 18 14:44:55 2009
New Revision: 147663
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147663
Log:
2009-05-18 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-18 14:47 ---
Fixed with r147663. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-18 16:59 ---
Comment #0 is fixed by the following one-liner patch:
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/resolve.c (revision 147663)
+++ gcc/fortran
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40176
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-17 14:13 ---
-fdump-parse-tree yields:
triple (struct array1_real(kind=4) __result, real(kind=4) a, real(kind=4)
b)
{
...
}
real(kind=4) (*T3e0) (real(kind=4) , real(kind=4) ) f;
f = (real(kind=4) (*T3e0) (real(kind=4
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 14:09 ---
Adding in the test case a line like
print *, f_array(1)%f(3.,5.)
produces a segfault in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref (trans-array.c, 2414).
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
of procedure pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-15 21:51 ---
Here is a small patch which fixes the test case:
Index: gcc/fortran/primary.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/primary.c (revision 147527)
+++ gcc/fortran
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 09:42 ---
Subject: Bug 39996
Author: janus
Date: Thu May 14 09:41:41 2009
New Revision: 147528
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147528
Log:
2009-05-14 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 09:46 ---
Fixed with r147528. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-13 17:15 ---
FAIL: gfortran.dg/interface_19.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_result_1.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
The last of these three test cases is probably invalid, the second failure
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-11 08:23 ---
Thus I would reason that g95, ifort and NAG (assuming Juergen Reuter is using
it) are correct in accepting it.
NAG indeed accepts it with -f2003. With -f95 it reports
Extension: c0.f90, line 32: Dummy ARG
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-11 09:55 ---
Actually gfortran even has the same check as NAG that rejects a private type as
component of a public type with -std=f95. And it happens that the bug which
leads to the bogus error message lies just in this check
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-11 14:14 ---
Subject: Bug 40089
Author: janus
Date: Mon May 11 14:14:38 2009
New Revision: 147379
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147379
Log:
2009-05-11 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-11 14:19 ---
Fixed with r147379. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40089
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-08 09:08 ---
Subject: Bug 39876
Author: janus
Date: Fri May 8 09:08:13 2009
New Revision: 147279
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147279
Log:
2009-05-08 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-08 09:11 ---
Fixed with r147279. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 39627
nThis:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40054
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-07 21:44 ---
Here is a preliminary patch which correctly rejects the code in comment #0:
Index: gcc/fortran/interface.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/interface.c (revision
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40039
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40045
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-06 14:58 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
and the interesting question is: Why is it called? There are no type-bound
procedures (and also no components [except of t2%t].
If it's a regression it may be caused by Daniel's r146733
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-06 21:17 ---
Subject: Bug 39630
Author: janus
Date: Wed May 6 21:17:16 2009
New Revision: 147206
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147206
Log:
2009-05-06 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
Paul Thomas
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-06 21:23 ---
Status: r147206 implements PPCs with NOPASS, but PASS is still missing ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39630
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-06 22:07 ---
From the little I understand 'external' should not be set to 1 for functions
listed as intrinsics but not f95 intrinsics.
I don't see any reason why 'erfc' should get the EXTERNAL attribute here at
all. In any
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-05 20:35 ---
Extended test case, including six similar cases, of which only the first three
are detected (comment #0 corresponds to case 'E'):
! Detected:
interface
real function A ()
end function
end interface
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-05 20:41 ---
Subject: Bug 39998
Author: janus
Date: Tue May 5 20:41:00 2009
New Revision: 147133
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147133
Log:
2009-05-05 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-05 20:47 ---
Fixed in r147133. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39998
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 09:44 ---
Subject: Bug 39931
Author: janus
Date: Tue Apr 28 09:44:36 2009
New Revision: 146880
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=146880
Log:
2009-04-28 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 09:44 ---
Subject: Bug 39930
Author: janus
Date: Tue Apr 28 09:44:36 2009
New Revision: 146880
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=146880
Log:
2009-04-28 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 10:50 ---
Fixed with r146880. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 10:52 ---
Fixed with r146880. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39946
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 14:52 ---
Here's a patch:
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/resolve.c (Revision 146879)
+++ gcc/fortran/resolve.c (Arbeitskopie
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 16:27 ---
Subject: Bug 39946
Author: janus
Date: Tue Apr 28 16:27:27 2009
New Revision: 146905
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=146905
Log:
2009-04-28 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 16:31 ---
Fixed with r146905. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39930
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-27 16:54 ---
Something like this should do it:
Index: gcc/fortran/parse.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/parse.c (Revision 146826)
+++ gcc/fortran/parse.c (Arbeitskopie
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-27 19:09 ---
Patch:
Index: gcc/fortran/expr.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/expr.c (Revision 146847)
+++ gcc/fortran/expr.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -3070,8 +3070,8
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-25 08:12 ---
Subject: Bug 39688
Author: janus
Date: Sat Apr 25 08:11:48 2009
New Revision: 146762
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=146762
Log:
2009-04-25 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-25 08:13 ---
Fixed in r146762. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-24 08:34 ---
Subject: Bug 39861
Author: janus
Date: Fri Apr 24 08:34:14 2009
New Revision: 146677
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=146677
Log:
2009-04-24 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-24 08:34 ---
Subject: Bug 39864
Author: janus
Date: Fri Apr 24 08:34:14 2009
New Revision: 146677
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=146677
Log:
2009-04-24 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-24 08:39 ---
Fixed by r146677. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-24 08:39 ---
Fixed by r146677. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-23 12:24 ---
write_symbol(): bad module symbol 'x'
Where does the symbol 'x' come from?
The 'x' here apparently is the formal argument of the sqrt() function!
I think Dominique was right in suspecting my r146554, which had
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-23 20:21 ---
Janus, can you have a look? It looks like another fallout of your patch.
Indeed, it is.
If it is not fixable quickly, we should consider backing it out
until we have a working version.
The fix is quite
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 09:06 ---
Subject: Bug 39735
Author: janus
Date: Wed Apr 22 09:05:58 2009
New Revision: 146554
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=146554
Log:
2009-04-22 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 09:24 ---
Fixed with r146554. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 11:29 ---
An example can be found in the following paper:
Norman S. Clerman: Note on creating an array of procedure pointers
ACM SIGPLAN Fortran Forum, Vol. 28, Issue 1 (2009)
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1520752.1520753
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39692
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-09 09:41 ---
Fixed by r145815. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-09 09:39 ---
Subject: Bug 36704
Author: janus
Date: Thu Apr 9 09:39:09 2009
New Revision: 145815
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=145815
Log:
2009-04-09 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695
--- Comment #20 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-08 14:03 ---
Subject: Bug 38152
Author: janus
Date: Wed Apr 8 14:03:33 2009
New Revision: 145735
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=145735
Log:
2009-04-08 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--- Comment #21 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-08 14:11 ---
Fixed in trunk and 4.4. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 07:25 ---
Subject: Bug 38920
Author: janus
Date: Tue Apr 7 07:24:37 2009
New Revision: 145651
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=145651
Log:
2009-04-07 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 07:32 ---
Fixed with r145651 (I messed up the PR number in the ChangeLog entry, though).
Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 07:34 ---
Oops. The commit in comment #9 was actually for PR38290, but I accidentally
messed up the PR number in the ChangeLog. Sorry for the noise.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38920
--- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 11:40 ---
Reopening.
proc_decl_13.f90 produces a segfault when compiled with -g.
Backtrace:
#0 0x00f4bee1 in htab_hash_string (p=0x0) at
/home/jweil/gcc45/trunk/libiberty/hashtab.c:812
#1 0x005ff979
--- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 11:43 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
proc_decl_13.f90 produces a segfault when compiled with -g.
Sorry. Of course I'm talking about proc_ptr_13.f90.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38152
--- Comment #18 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 12:41 ---
Patch:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c(Revision 145652)
+++ gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1015,10
--- Comment #19 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 16:24 ---
Subject: Bug 38152
Author: janus
Date: Tue Apr 7 16:24:31 2009
New Revision: 145692
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=145692
Log:
2009-04-07 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-06 08:33 ---
Subject: Bug 39414
Author: janus
Date: Mon Apr 6 08:33:31 2009
New Revision: 145583
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=145583
Log:
2009-04-06 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran/39414
801 - 900 of 1015 matches
Mail list logo
