https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82679
--- Comment #4 from olivier.delande.spam at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
> Sorry, I probably shouldn't have closed this. I guess what we want to
> reject is
>
> typedef int T[10];
> _
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82679
--- Comment #2 from olivier.delande.spam at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> GCC is correct here, and this behavior is intentional:
I don't understand. The comment you are quoting mentions d
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: olivier.delande.spam at googlemail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 42445
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42445&action=edit
minimal
