[Bug plugins/56754] some missing plugin headers during installation in gcc 4.8

2013-05-21 Thread pageexec at freemail dot hu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56754 --- Comment #6 from PaX Team pageexec at freemail dot hu --- (In reply to Duncan Sands from comment #5) Was there any feedback on this patch? sadly, no response so far (this bug is still UNCONFIRMED even), so it's probably not going to make

[Bug plugins/56795] New: gimple_seq_alloc and gimple_seq_free are still present in gcc-4.8's gimple.h

2013-03-31 Thread pageexec at freemail dot hu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56795 Bug #: 56795 Summary: gimple_seq_alloc and gimple_seq_free are still present in gcc-4.8's gimple.h Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug plugins/56754] New: some missing plugin headers during installation in gcc 4.8

2013-03-27 Thread pageexec at freemail dot hu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56754 Bug #: 56754 Summary: some missing plugin headers during installation in gcc 4.8 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug middle-end/56288] New: always true conditional expression in verify_ssa_name

2013-02-11 Thread pageexec at freemail dot hu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56288 Bug #: 56288 Summary: always true conditional expression in verify_ssa_name Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug plugins/41757] Add PLUGIN_FINISH_DECL

2012-05-22 Thread pageexec at freemail dot hu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41757 pageexec at freemail dot hu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pageexec at freemail dot hu

[Bug middle-end/51071] [4.7 Regression] ICE in gimple_has_side_effects, at gimple.c:2513

2012-05-21 Thread pageexec at freemail dot hu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51071 --- Comment #6 from pageexec at freemail dot hu 2012-05-21 11:41:10 UTC --- Created attachment 27458 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27458 test case for gcc 4.6.x this is a compressed test case (would be too big to attach

[Bug middle-end/51071] [4.7 Regression] ICE in gimple_has_side_effects, at gimple.c:2513

2012-05-18 Thread pageexec at freemail dot hu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51071 pageexec at freemail dot hu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pageexec at freemail dot hu

[Bug c/46354] New: attribute((aligned(...))) can incorrectly decrease structure field alignment

2010-11-07 Thread pageexec at freemail dot hu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46354 Summary: attribute((aligned(...))) can incorrectly decrease structure field alignment Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c/46354] attribute((aligned(...))) can incorrectly decrease structure field alignment

2010-11-07 Thread pageexec at freemail dot hu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46354 --- Comment #1 from pageexec at freemail dot hu 2010-11-07 22:43:33 UTC --- Created attachment 22314 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22314 sample code to demonstrate structure field offsets

[Bug c/46354] attribute((aligned(...))) can incorrectly decrease structure field alignment

2010-11-07 Thread pageexec at freemail dot hu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46354 --- Comment #3 from pageexec at freemail dot hu 2010-11-07 23:33:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Generally GCC lays out structures based on the types of the elemets, not based on the alignment specified on fields. according to the gcc docs