[Bug middle-end/31241] Post Increment opportunity missed

2007-03-18 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
--- Comment #2 from ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2007-03-19 02:52 --- A similar problem also exists on the dataflow branch. Adding Kenneth Zadeck to the CC. However fno-tree-lrs has no impact in the df branch as on revision 122955 . -- ramana dot radhakrishnan

[Bug driver/30491] New: behaviour with -MMD and -c / -E causes differring behaviours.

2007-01-17 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
behaviours. Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com GCC host

[Bug rtl-optimization/30121] New: ICE on frtl-abstract-sequences and mthumb.

2006-12-08 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
org ReportedBy: ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: arm-none-eabi http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30121

[Bug rtl-optimization/30121] ICE on frtl-abstract-sequences and mthumb.

2006-12-08 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
--- Comment #1 from ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2006-12-08 15:14 --- The ICE comes from compute_init_costs in rtl-factoring.c where rtx_store is set to be /* Pattern for storing address. */ rtx_store = gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, reg, gen_symbol_ref_rtx_for_label

[Bug rtl-optimization/29294] 4.1, 4.2 (possibly 4.0?) not finding postmodify address mode on ARM

2006-10-09 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
--- Comment #7 from ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2006-10-09 16:33 --- (In reply to comment #5) flow.c is responsible for generating POST_INCs and POST_MODIFY's in 3.4 / 4.0 / 4.1 / 4.2 . I believe this is being replaced by the new data flow bits in the data flow branch

[Bug middle-end/24427] missing optimization opportunity with binary operators

2006-06-26 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
--- Comment #5 from ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2006-06-26 19:13 --- This should be reopened. A related testcase shows a regression from 3.4.6 to 4.1.1 for m68k-elf shows a regression . combine used to take care of this in 3.4.6 . A backport of the patch is ready

[Bug regression/28173] New: 4.1.1 misses constant folding .

2006-06-26 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com GCC host triplet: i686-linux GCC target triplet: m68k-elf http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28173

[Bug middle-end/27226] Compiler looses track of alignment for emit_block_move

2006-06-07 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
--- Comment #14 from ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2006-06-07 21:20 --- Add self to CC. -- ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/27623] New: invalid loop transformation.

2006-05-16 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
: ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux GCC target triplet: powerpc-elf http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27623

[Bug rtl-optimization/27625] New: invalid loop transformation.

2006-05-16 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
: ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux GCC target triplet: powerpc-elf http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27625

[Bug rtl-optimization/27623] invalid loop transformation.

2006-05-16 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
--- Comment #1 from ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2006-05-16 10:45 --- Clicked too early. Can be marked invalid. -- ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/27625] invalid loop transformation.

2006-05-16 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
--- Comment #1 from ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2006-05-16 12:11 --- Richi on IRC suggested that a weak attribute for reloc_num would fix this . The assumption being made is that the address of reloc_num can never be 0 , which ofcourse is not the case for a weak symbol

[Bug c/26732] New: Rejects valid code at different optimization levels.

2006-03-17 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com GCC host triplet: i686-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: arm-none-eabi http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug c/26591] New: Spurious parse error message with register struct .

2006-03-07 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com GCC build triplet: i686-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: arm-none-eabi http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26591

[Bug c/26591] Spurious parse error message with register struct .

2006-03-07 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
--- Comment #1 from ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2006-03-07 10:49 --- Occurs with arm-none-eabi-gcc 4.1.0 -branch with yesterday's update. -- ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/8972] [arc-7-elf] the c code ' x i' causes infinite loop when i = 0

2005-07-27 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
--- Additional Comments From ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2005-07-27 10:19 --- (In reply to comment #11) No, that'd be wrong. The correct status for a bug with a pending patch is ASSIGNED. Can the target milestone be changed ? I see this has been approved by Roger

[Bug target/8973] [arc-7-elf] the interupt handler does not return properly, uses j.d insted of j.d.f

2005-07-27 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
--- Additional Comments From ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2005-07-27 10:20 --- (In reply to comment #11) No that's wrong. WAITING means waiting feedback *from submitter*. This has been approved at : http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg01918.html Can

[Bug target/17317] [3.3 Regression] Match Constraints for *movdf_insn fails

2005-04-22 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
--- Additional Comments From ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2005-04-22 07:43 --- If the above patch set is applied for 3.3.6, please also apply this patch so that the build does not break. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/arc/lib1funcs.asm.diff?cvsroot

[Bug target/18263] [3.4 only] Build broken for ARC.

2004-11-16 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
--- Additional Comments From ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2004-11-17 04:09 --- Now that gcc 3.4 branch is thawed , could this patch be applied to the 3.4 branch as well . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18263

[Bug target/18263] New: Build broken for ARC.

2004-11-01 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
. -- Summary: Build broken for ARC. Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot

[Bug target/18263] Build broken for ARC.

2004-11-01 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
--- Additional Comments From ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2004-11-01 12:23 --- Patch submitted at : http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg00024.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/17943] building gcc head (20041011) for arc-elf32 results in a lot of warnings

2004-10-12 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
--- Additional Comments From ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2004-10-12 12:33 --- All these would be due to non-use of the define_predicate md file construct. The backend needs to be cleaned to use the new define_predicate construct. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug target/17317] Match Constraints for *movdf_insn fails

2004-10-10 Thread ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
--- Additional Comments From ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2004-10-11 05:16 --- Patch submitted for review. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg00891.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17317