--- Additional Comments From gerald at pfeifer dot com 2005-06-07 00:37
---
Confirmed. Also on FreeBSD this has been fixed on mainline, so I'm removing
the 4.1 tag from the summary.
Having a backport to 4.0 would be great.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20155
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-14
08:55 ---
Adding Mark so that he can judge the opportunity of a backport.
Removing bug 21624 dependency, because it is indeed fixed on mainline. If bug
21624 were fixed the command line could be even shorter, but th
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-07-15 00:30
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] libgcj build fails with
"execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long"
bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-08
17:00 ---
Andrew, is a backport fine with you?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20155
--- Additional Comments From aph at redhat dot com 2005-08-08 17:03 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] libgcj build fails with "execvp: /bin/sh:
Argument list too long"
bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
>
> Andrew, is a backport fine with you?
Yes. Go for it.
Andrew.
--
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-17
12:56 ---
Committing to 4.0 branch.
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|4.0.1
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-17
14:56 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
