[Bug bootstrap/28472] -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/

2018-10-03 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28472 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/28472] -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/

2018-07-03 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28472 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/28472] -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/

2007-01-12 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #8 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2007-01-13 01:15 --- Subject: Re: -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/ Wrote on Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:35:39 +0300: will try it for 3.0.3 Did so. `--with-ld=/bin/ld --without-gnu-ld' it did link programs properly even if `$(build_tooldir)/bin/ld' was

[Bug bootstrap/28472] -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/

2006-12-29 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #7 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2006-12-29 14:35 --- Subject: Re: -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/ Can you give the output of the original confgure which should show you which ld/as GCC is going to use? No. Version 4 just does not build on that system at all (or this requires

[Bug bootstrap/28472] -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/

2006-12-28 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #5 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2006-12-28 13:32 --- Subject: Re: -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/ It actually broke build of gcc (version 3.0.3) at least on one class of systems, i386-pc-sco3.2v5, as follows. Had on that system gnu binutils installed with PREFIX. Had gcc

[Bug bootstrap/28472] -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/

2006-12-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-28 14:55 --- No, I still say you are incorrect. Can you give the output of the original confgure which should show you which ld/as GCC is going to use? By default the toplevel configure looks into PREFIX/${TARGET} for ld/as.

[Bug bootstrap/28472] -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/

2006-09-04 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #3 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2006-09-04 19:32 --- Subject: Re: -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/ Why do you think this wrong? -B. is suppied first so this is not a bug If during build all files are found through `-B./' (or other specification of part of build tree containing

[Bug bootstrap/28472] -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/

2006-09-04 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #4 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2006-09-04 20:02 --- A question was sent to original reporter: Why do you think this wrong? If it was needed at all, the actions on the bug could have depended on the answer, and whether it should be closed could be decided only after

[Bug bootstrap/28472] -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/

2006-09-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-03 21:05 --- Hmm: # Since gcc_tooldir does not exist at build-time, use -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/ build_tooldir = $(exec_prefix)/$(target_noncanonical) Why do you think this wrong? -B. is suppied first so this is not a bug, the