http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #47 from bkorb at gnu dot org 2012-01-11 14:31:15 UTC ---
To eliminate any possible ambiguity, the patch is approved
On 01/10/12 23:49, andreast at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
Andreas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #48 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2012-01-11 16:23:14 UTC ---
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 07:49:41AM +, andreast at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
This is the CL I prepared:
2012-01-11 Bruce Korb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
Andreas Tobler andreast at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #44 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-10
13:44:22 UTC ---
There is a conflict between the FreeBSD headers and G++, and we can fix it with
fixincludes. Let's do that and move on.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
Andreas Tobler andreast at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26207|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
Andreas Tobler andreast at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #33 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2012-01-09 20:13:08 UTC ---
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 04:14:08PM +, bkorb at gnu dot org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #32 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #34 from Andreas Tobler andreast at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-09
20:32:00 UTC ---
Just to double check, shall I leave the backslash in this line?
c_fix_arg = __attribute__\(\(__noreturn__\)\);
And more important, do we have an ok for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #35 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2012-01-09 21:33:23 UTC ---
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 08:32:00PM +, andreast at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #36 from Chris Jefferson chris at bubblescope dot net 2012-01-09
21:45:10 UTC ---
By your reasoning, FreeBSD really may as well take out code which requires
__cplusplus == 201103L , as no compiler will support all of C++11 for several
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #37 from bkorb at gnu dot org 2012-01-09 22:11:09 UTC ---
It is getting too confusing.
+/*
+ * 'g++ -std=c++11' defines __cplusplus to 201103L, which suggests
+ * that it conforms to ISO/IEC 14882:2011. Until G++ fully conforms,
+ *
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #38 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2012-01-09 22:31:03 UTC ---
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 09:45:10PM +, chris at bubblescope dot net wrote:
By your reasoning, FreeBSD really may as well take out code which
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #39 from Ed Schouten ed at 80386 dot nl 2012-01-09 22:37:41 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #36)
By your reasoning, FreeBSD really may as well take out code which requires
__cplusplus == 201103L , as no compiler will support all of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #40 from Chris Jefferson chris at bubblescope dot net 2012-01-09
22:45:32 UTC ---
There are several C++11 features which clang does not support, which g++ does.
clang also defines __cplusplus == 201103L, despite not implementing large
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #41 from Ed Schouten ed at 80386 dot nl 2012-01-09 22:48:35 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #40)
There are several C++11 features which clang does not support, which g++ does.
clang also defines __cplusplus == 201103L, despite not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #42 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2012-01-09 22:51:04 UTC ---
The obvious issue with C++11 attributes (such as [[noreturn]]) is that the
syntactic bindings are (or were when I last looked at a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #43 from Chris Jefferson chris at bubblescope dot net 2012-01-09
22:59:49 UTC ---
g++ only does this while compiling the C++ standard library. clang doesn't come
(by default) with a C++ standard library, so you have to use either
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkorb at gnu dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #25 from bkorb at gnu dot org 2012-01-06 15:09:46 UTC ---
RE: Comment #16 through Comment #23 -- Do not use sed. There is no compelling
reason to do so. Please read the fixincludes README, wherein sed is
disparaged. I'll add to that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #26 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2012-01-06 15:22:09 UTC ---
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 03:09:46PM +, bkorb at gnu dot org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #25 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06
15:30:23 UTC ---
I'd say:
c_fix_arg = __attribute__((__noreturn__));
would be better. Thanks for writing a comment that has just the important
facts in it and no emotions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #29 from Andreas Tobler andreast at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06
15:57:51 UTC ---
Bootstrap in progress with the below.
Additions:
- Jakub's recent comment on c_fix_arg.
- extend mach to match FreeBSD10.* to FreeBSD19.* (Should give
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #30 from bkorb at gnu dot org 2012-01-06 16:10:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #28)
I'll remember to add a comment to this PR once ...
I fully intend to remember, too.
Probably the appropriate thing is a new bug #51776
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #32 from bkorb at gnu dot org 2012-01-06 16:14:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #29)
+c_fix_arg = __attribute__\(\(__noreturn__\)\);
In a double quoted string, the backslash quotes always quote
the character that follows. Here,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #31 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2012-01-06 16:11:08 UTC ---
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 03:30:23PM +, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #27
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
27 matches
Mail list logo
