http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-23
20:44:38 UTC ---
Note that the configure test for whether the gcc driver supports
-static-libstdc++ is unreliable, because before GCC 4.6 the GCC driver would
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-23
20:46:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
Note that the configure test for whether the gcc driver supports
-static-libstdc++ is unreliable, because before GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-23
20:57:29 UTC ---
Can't we also try running the resulting program, or at least looking at the
output of ldd as this only matters for bootstrapping?
We can
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
--- Comment #18 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-23
21:08:45 UTC ---
Actually, g++ -static-libstdc++ foo.cpp produces a working executable, so that
wouldn't work.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-23
21:14:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Actually, g++ -static-libstdc++ foo.cpp produces a working executable, so that
wouldn't work.
But looking at the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
--- Comment #20 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-23
22:57:47 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Oct 23 22:57:43 2012
New Revision: 192748
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192748
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-22
07:27:28 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Oct 22 07:27:21 2012
New Revision: 192666
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192666
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-10-14
08:56:25 UTC ---
Eric's patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg01093.html fixed
the Ada bootstrap without static libstdc++ problem on my ARM box.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-14
09:17:50 UTC ---
Eric's patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg01093.html fixed
the Ada bootstrap without static libstdc++ problem on my ARM box.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
--- Comment #10 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-10-14
10:09:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Can you confirm that the stage 2 3
executables, for example cc1 and gnat1, aren't dynamically linked against
libstdc++?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at
On that machine, the entire user-space is built without any static
libstdc++
libraries, so it's quite annoying (and unexpected) to have to install them
for
Ada bootstrap. Couldn't Ada use the g++/libstdc++ bits from the compiler
being built?
That would probably be better indeed, it's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
--- Comment #4 from charlet at adacore dot com charlet at adacore dot com
2012-10-09 08:34:03 UTC ---
On that machine, the entire user-space is built without any static
libstdc++
libraries, so it's quite annoying (and unexpected) to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On that machine, the entire user-space is built without any static
libstdc++
libraries, so it's quite annoying (and unexpected) to have to install
them for
Ada bootstrap. Couldn't Ada use the g++/libstdc++ bits from the compiler
being
built?
No, this is stage 1 so the libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
--- Comment #6 from charlet at adacore dot com charlet at adacore dot com
2012-10-09 13:09:38 UTC ---
On that machine, the entire user-space is built without any static
libstdc++
libraries, so it's quite annoying (and unexpected) to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-09
13:37:57 UTC ---
Well, we could first build g++ and libstdc++, and then Ada I guess, but
that's probably too ambitious.
Very likely indeed, since you need to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
23 matches
Mail list logo
