--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-16 06:08
---
Subject: Bug 27689
Author: mmitchel
Date: Fri Jun 16 06:08:49 2006
New Revision: 114703
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114703
Log:
PR c++/27689
* cp-tree.h
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-05-26 15:04 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I think GCC 4.2.0 is correct in saying the function call is ambiguous, bar is
still a template class.
Most definitely, fooint::bar is not a template class, and the only
thing the call to f()
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:35
---
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.0.2
Summary|[4.0/4.2 regression]|[4.1/4.2
--- Comment #2 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2006-05-20
21:32 ---
But for what F and T would FT match fooint::bar ?
In looking for workarounds I found that the same problem occurs when using
partial specialization:
template typename struct S {};
template
