--- Comment #6 from numerical dot simulation at web dot de 2010-05-03
12:53 ---
Hi!
Though I love the fact that this code now compiles, I am still unsure whether
this is the right thing to have.
From http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#502 I see
that
the
--- Comment #5 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-28 18:47 ---
compiles without error using 4.4.3 or 4.6.0
--
redi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from numerical dot simulation at web dot de 2007-04-23
17:24 ---
Sorry, the link was wrong, must be
http://groups.google.de/group/comp.lang.c++.moderated/browse_thread/thread/8c3b8a84ed78b003/4d9603171894a75d?hl=de#4d9603171894a75d
--
--- Comment #3 from numerical dot simulation at web dot de 2007-04-18
07:51 ---
I started a discussion about this code on
comp.lang.c++.moderated, subject
enum in template memfun in class template - valid C++?
see
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-16 07:43 ---
The trunk gives:
t.cc: In member function 'void CT::DoSomething(int) [with CT::Inner I = c,
T = double]':
t.cc:32: instantiated from here
t.cc:24: error: incomplete type 'Cdouble::Dispatcherc, 1' used in nested
--- Comment #2 from numerical dot simulation at web dot de 2007-04-16
10:31 ---
The compiler at
http://www.comeaucomputing.com/tryitout/
has absolutely no problems with the code.
M$-VC8 says:
error C2754: 'CT::Dispatcherc,dummy' : a partial specialization cannot have
a dependent
