--- Comment #11 from bjoern dot haase at de dot bosch dot com 2006-08-10
12:11 ---
Hi,
here is a much simpler test case for this issue.
Bjoern.
#include
using namespace std;
const complex should_be_in_rodata (42,-42);
complex should_be_in_data (42,-42);
complex should_be_in_bss;
--- Comment #12 from mrs at apple dot com 2006-08-10 16:54 ---
Trivially, one could use turing completeness at compile time to achieve the
desired result. :-) Not that I think that is better than `fixing' this bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 00:51 ---
Reopening this bug since it is the correct one to keep open.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 00:55
---
*** Bug 22575 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20
18:44 ---
*** Bug 22575 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2005-07-20 18:53 ---
hmm, i think someone should reopen this bug.
4.1 is a good place for major changes in c++ front-end ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20
18:58 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> hmm, i think someone should reopen this bug.
> 4.1 is a good place for major changes in c++ front-end ;)
Not any more since we are in stage3 already.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bu
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-07-20 19:03
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > hmm, i think someone should reopen this bug.
> > 4.1 is a good place for major changes in c++ front-end ;)
> Not any more since we are in stage3 already.
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-20
19:11 ---
Subject: Re: Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to
".rodata" section?
On Jul 20, 2005, at 3:03 PM, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
> - given that 4.1's front end has already evolv
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-07-20 19:47
---
It may be true that this bug isn't going to be fixed in this cycle,
but there's no reason not to keep it open instead of suspending it.
The "suspend" state is mean for PRs where we need external things to
hap
On Jul 20, 2005, at 3:03 PM, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
- given that 4.1's front end has already evolved from that in 2.95,
it's not clear that a conclusion based on 2.95 is even valid for
4.1.
(so should no likely assumed as being so).
It still is true since the front-end still
12 matches
Mail list logo
