http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188
--- Comment #14 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18 20:32:08 UTC ---
Author: fabien
Date: Fri Nov 18 20:32:04 2011
New Revision: 181492
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181492
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2011-11-18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188
--- Comment #1 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-17 09:25:55 UTC ---
Yet another bug caused by my recent changes with using declarations.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188
--- Comment #3 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-17 10:21:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #0)
[...]
Jason, I'd like to run the testsuite without this 7 member rule, how could I
do
that ?
To clarify, I mean 0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-17
15:17:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
There is a strange thing here, if we reach 7 members in a class, things are
done differently in the compiler.
Jason, I'd like to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-17
19:32:13 UTC ---
It looks like the sorted fields code in lookup_field_1 needs to handle
using_decl like the unsorted fields code does. I think this will also fix
PR51141
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188
--- Comment #6 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-17 20:24:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
It looks like the sorted fields code in lookup_field_1 needs to handle
using_decl like the unsorted fields code does. I think this will also fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188
--- Comment #7 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-17 20:57:16 UTC ---
FYI, it fixes the following PRs: c++/51190, c++/51189, c++/51188, c++/51152,
c++/51141.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188
--- Comment #9 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-17 20:59:37 UTC ---
*** Bug 51189 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-17
21:03:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
do
-field = fields[i--];
+field = strip_using_decl (fields[i--]);
while (i = lo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cas43 at cs dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188
--- Comment #13 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-17 21:53:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Let's wait and strip_using_decl after the loop (i.e. at the return statement),
since a USING_DECL has the same name. We also need to check
15 matches
Mail list logo
