[Bug c++/53549] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ and armadillo 3.2.0, operator() is inaccessible

2012-07-22 Thread conradsand.arma at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549 --- Comment #14 from Conrad 2012-07-23 05:25:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > Fixed. Thanks!

[Bug c++/53549] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ and armadillo 3.2.0, operator() is inaccessible

2012-07-17 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53549] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ and armadillo 3.2.0, operator() is inaccessible

2012-07-17 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53549] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ and armadillo 3.2.0, operator() is inaccessible

2012-07-17 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549 --- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2012-07-17 19:27:55 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jul 17 19:27:51 2012 New Revision: 189585 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189585 Log: PR c++/53549 * parser.c (cp_parser_class_h

[Bug c++/53549] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ and armadillo 3.2.0, operator() is inaccessible

2012-07-17 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2012-07-17 18:09:07 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jul 17 18:08:59 2012 New Revision: 189582 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189582 Log: PR c++/53549 * parser.c (cp_parser_class_h

[Bug c++/53549] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ and armadillo 3.2.0, operator() is inaccessible

2012-07-10 Thread conradsand.arma at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549 --- Comment #10 from Conrad 2012-07-10 07:22:00 UTC --- Created attachment 27769 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27769 arma323.ii.gz Retested with gcc 4.7.1 and Armadillo 3.2.3 (latest upstream version). This time a related

[Bug c++/53549] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ and armadillo 3.2.0, operator() is inaccessible

2012-06-14 Thread fabien at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|un

[Bug c++/53549] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ and armadillo 3.2.0, operator() is inaccessible

2012-06-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-12 12:17:37 UTC --- This started to be rejected with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182711

[Bug c++/53549] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ and armadillo 3.2.0, operator() is inaccessible

2012-06-12 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-12 10:39:20 UTC --- Further reduced, a single example showing both errors: template struct C { int operator()(); template struct F : C { using C::operator();

[Bug c++/53549] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ and armadillo 3.2.0, operator() is inaccessible

2012-06-12 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fabien at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/53549] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ and armadillo 3.2.0, operator() is inaccessible

2012-06-12 Thread conradsand.arma at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549 --- Comment #6 from Conrad 2012-06-12 09:42:08 UTC --- bug not present when compiling with Clang 3.0 (I've found clang to often have more thorough/readable diagnostics than gcc) output of clang -v: clang version 3.0 (tags/RELEASE_30/final) Targ

[Bug c++/53549] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ and armadillo 3.2.0, operator() is inaccessible

2012-06-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCON