http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
--- Comment #14 from Conrad 2012-07-23
05:25:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Fixed.
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2012-07-17
19:27:55 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jul 17 19:27:51 2012
New Revision: 189585
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189585
Log:
PR c++/53549
* parser.c (cp_parser_class_h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2012-07-17
18:09:07 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jul 17 18:08:59 2012
New Revision: 189582
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189582
Log:
PR c++/53549
* parser.c (cp_parser_class_h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
--- Comment #10 from Conrad 2012-07-10
07:22:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 27769
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27769
arma323.ii.gz
Retested with gcc 4.7.1 and Armadillo 3.2.3 (latest upstream version).
This time a related
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-12
12:17:37 UTC ---
This started to be rejected with
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182711
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-12
10:39:20 UTC ---
Further reduced, a single example showing both errors:
template
struct C
{
int operator()();
template
struct F : C
{
using C::operator();
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fabien at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
--- Comment #6 from Conrad 2012-06-12
09:42:08 UTC ---
bug not present when compiling with Clang 3.0
(I've found clang to often have more thorough/readable diagnostics than gcc)
output of clang -v:
clang version 3.0 (tags/RELEASE_30/final)
Targ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
12 matches
Mail list logo