--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-02
18:18 ---
Not a bug, the large number - 1.0 is still large number because with doubles
you cannot repestent that
number,
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-02 17:54
---
Because the "big number" exceeds the representable precision of a double,
thereby 1 is less significant than the least significant representable magnitude
of the stored value, thereby can't effect it if summed.
