--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-31 17:43 ---
The code is valid in gnu89 mode.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-30 16:04 ---
I think it is caused by revision 118356:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2006-11/msg7.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39026
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-30 16:44 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
It would be a way more local change than changing what binds local
(which also affects other languages).
My proposal patch will bind undefined functions global, instead of
local. It
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-29 18:34 ---
Icc 11.0 gave:
[...@gnu-6 tmp]$ /opt/intel/cce/11.0/bin/icc -S i.i-Wall
i.i(1): remark #1419: external declaration in primary source file
inline void foo ();
^
[...@gnu-6 tmp]$
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-01-29 20:02 ---
Subject: Re: New: Gcc accepts invalid code
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
inline void foo ();
int
main ()
{
foo ();
return 0;
}
[...@gnu-6 gcc]$ gcc /tmp/i.i -S
If
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-29 20:09 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
If you use -std=c99 -pedantic-errors you get an error, as expected.
You're compiling in gnu89 mode.
If you use -std=c99 without -pedantic-errors you get a duplicate warning:
t.c:1:
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-01-29 21:24 ---
Subject: Re: Gcc accepts invalid code
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-01-29 20:02
---
Subject: Re: New: Gcc accepts
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-30 01:17 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
I think the frontend should, in C89 mode and if just issueing a warning,
set DECL_EXTERNAL properly on the decl.
Do we want to make such a change, especially for 4.3 branch?
--
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-01-30 06:52 ---
Subject: Re: Gcc accepts invalid code
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-30 01:17
---
(In reply to comment #4)
I
