[Bug c/72794] [7 regression] CF on spec2000/176.gcc after r238862.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794 --- Comment #6 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- Thanks for clarification. This bug can be closed as user misunderstanding. 2016-08-04 14:08 GMT+03:00 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org : >

[Bug c/72794] [7 regression] CF on spec2000/176.gcc after r238862.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- No, it's not a bug in the LTO phase - C99 inline simply does _not_ emit a out-of-line copy. You have to add a extern declaration to force that.

[Bug c/72794] [7 regression] CF on spec2000/176.gcc after r238862.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794 --- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- I assume that there is still issue in lto part of compiler - even if we ignore "inline" attribute we (lto) must not delete such functions from binaries. So this bug must be forwarded to lto phase.

[Bug c/72794] [7 regression] CF on spec2000/176.gcc after r238862.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/72794] [7 regression'] CF on spec2000/176.gcc after r238862.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794 --- Comment #2 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- Yes, this option cures CF. Does it mean that we must compile spec2000 with this flag? 2016-08-03 19:08 GMT+03:00 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org : >

[Bug c/72794] [7 regression'] CF on spec2000/176.gcc after r238862.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Can you try with -std=gnu90 and see if that fixes the issue.