[Bug debug/37022] [4.4 regression] internal compiler error: in compute_barrier_args_size

2008-12-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-27 14:58 --- Any news on this bug, it is one of the last P1s for 4.4? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37022

[Bug debug/37022] [4.4 regression] internal compiler error: in compute_barrier_args_size

2008-12-27 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-27 20:51 --- The original failures, closure_fn* have gone. So I didn't follow. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37022

[Bug debug/37022] [4.4 regression] internal compiler error: in compute_barrier_args_size

2008-08-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37022

[Bug debug/37022] [4.4 regression] internal compiler error: in compute_barrier_args_size

2008-08-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-13 08:54 --- After more thinking, I'm not convinced even debuggers need it when frame pointer is present (as Jan just told me, gdb ignores DW_CFA_GNU_args_size altogether anyway). The current sp comes up just from unwinding

[Bug debug/37022] [4.4 regression] internal compiler error: in compute_barrier_args_size

2008-08-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-11 12:09 --- Sorry, I can't reproduce the first issue with a x86_64-linux - i?86-darwin cross on the provided preprocessed testcase, tried many different -march=/-mtune= options as well as -f{,no-}asynchronous-unwind-tables. What

[Bug debug/37022] [4.4 regression] internal compiler error: in compute_barrier_args_size

2008-08-11 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-11 18:12 --- When I opened the PR I had set the target to x86_64-apple-darwin9. It does not happen under ix86-apple-darwin9. My config for gcc looks like this: [deuterium:gcc/head/objdir-x86_64] andreast% ./gcc/xgcc -v

[Bug debug/37022] [4.4 regression] internal compiler error: in compute_barrier_args_size

2008-08-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-11 20:17 --- The darwin -m64 failures are then the same problem, cross-jumping of noreturn calls between different level of stack depths. I've been wrong about DW_CFA_GNU_args_size being useless for cfa.reg !=

[Bug debug/37022] [4.4 regression] internal compiler error: in compute_barrier_args_size

2008-08-11 Thread xuepeng dot guo at intel dot com
--- Comment #10 from xuepeng dot guo at intel dot com 2008-08-12 02:07 --- (In reply to comment #7) Sorry, I can't reproduce the first issue with a x86_64-linux - i?86-darwin cross on the provided preprocessed testcase, tried many different -march=/-mtune= options as well as

[Bug debug/37022] [4.4 regression] internal compiler error: in compute_barrier_args_size

2008-08-11 Thread xuepeng dot guo at intel dot com
--- Comment #11 from xuepeng dot guo at intel dot com 2008-08-12 02:11 --- (In reply to comment #9) The darwin -m64 failures are then the same problem, cross-jumping of noreturn calls between different level of stack depths. I've been wrong about DW_CFA_GNU_args_size being useless

[Bug debug/37022] [4.4 regression] internal compiler error: in compute_barrier_args_size

2008-08-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker Keywords|

[Bug debug/37022] [4.4 regression] internal compiler error: in compute_barrier_args_size

2008-08-06 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-06 13:30 --- The new testcase http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16031action=view also fails on Linux/ia32 and revision 138427 is the cause. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What

[Bug debug/37022] [4.4 regression] internal compiler error: in compute_barrier_args_size

2008-08-06 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-06 13:32 --- (In reply to comment #3) Created an attachment (id=16031) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16031action=view) [edit] A smaller case. [EMAIL PROTECTED] stackalign]$

[Bug debug/37022] [4.4 regression] internal compiler error: in compute_barrier_args_size

2008-08-06 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-06 13:51 --- From Xuepeng: __attribute__((noinline, used)) void foo (int a, ...) { va_list arg; char *p; int size; va_start (arg, a); size = va_arg (arg, int); if (size != 2) /*A*/ abort (); p = (char

[Bug debug/37022] [4.4 regression] internal compiler error: in compute_barrier_args_size

2008-08-06 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last