--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 22:49
---
*** Bug 28877 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #15 from rep dot nop at aon dot at 2005-10-17 07:09 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > Also your patch had odd whitespace.
>
> Do you mean tabs or something else?
> tabs = 8 spaces in the GNU coding style.
>
I mean something else, specifically:
@@
--- Comment #14 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-17 04:22
---
Subject: Bug 22544
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-17 04:22:51
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog gcc.c
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-17 04:22
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
--- Comment #12 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-17 04:22
---
Subject: Bug 22544
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-17 04:22:03
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog gcc.c
Log message:
2005-10
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-16 16:23
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Also your patch had odd whitespace.
Do you mean tabs or something else?
tabs = 8 spaces in the GNU coding style.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22544
--- Comment #10 from rep dot nop at aon dot at 2005-10-16 16:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=10004)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10004&action=view)
fix w/ warning about mixed incompatible languages too
Changelog:
* gcc.c (have_c): New static variable.
(have_o): L
--- Comment #9 from rep dot nop at aon dot at 2005-10-16 16:19 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > Was the non-standard behaviour in 3.4 a bug or a feature? In any case,
> > isn't it
> > reasonable to mention the -combine option in the error message?
>
> The be
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-16 14:32 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Was the non-standard behaviour in 3.4 a bug or a feature? In any case, isn't
> it
> reasonable to mention the -combine option in the error message?
The behavior in 3.4 was a feature, IIR
--- Comment #7 from indan at nul dot nu 2005-10-16 12:06 ---
Was the non-standard behaviour in 3.4 a bug or a feature? In any case, isn't it
reasonable to mention the -combine option in the error message? Something like:
fatal ("cannot specify -o with -c or -S with multiple files. Try -
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-16 04:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=1)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1&action=view)
The fix which needs to be tested
Changelog:
* gcc.c (have_c): New static variable.
(have_o): Likewise.
(process
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-16 04:45 ---
I have a fix.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|un
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-16 00:22 ---
*** Bug 24395 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-06 16:46 ---
*** Bug 24241 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22544
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-18
14:42 ---
Note GCC 3.3 gave an error:
gcc: cannot specify -o with -c or -S and multiple compilations
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22544
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-18
14:41 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
17 matches
Mail list logo
