https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109358
--- Comment #16 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I think I was not being very clear when I opened pr113897. nX descriptors are
very similar to TR code and I meeantt to take care of those in the 113897. The
reason for the separate PR is that the problem i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109358
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109358
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109358
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d85a658402d5433ff223ce8f4e70174ed8a20428
commit r13-8322-gd85a658402d5433ff223ce8f4e70174ed8a20428
Author: Jerry DeLisle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109358
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:153ce7a78edbe339fa0b1cd314dea0554f59faf0
commit r14-8944-g153ce7a78edbe339fa0b1cd314dea0554f59faf0
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109358
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I am going to submit the attached patch to close this PR and open a new PR for
the lingering multiple tab edits in a row. The problem there is we have a
special case if we have different T, TL, and TR follo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109358
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle ---
To clarify. The following is the remaining issue that is not related to stream
I/O:
> program tabs
> implicit none
> integer :: fd
> open(newunit=fd, file="test.txt", form="formatted")
> write(fd,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109358
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 57365
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57365&action=edit
Preliminary patch
The attached patch fixes the stream I/O related tabbing. This regression tests
fine. There
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109358
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nmm1 at cam dot ac.uk
--- Comment #8 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109358
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 01:51:02AM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109358
>
> Jerry DeLisle changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109358
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109358
--- Comment #5 from Bálint Aradi ---
I also think that by allowing for explicit EORs caused by achar(10) characters
in the variable being written or by explicit new_line() calls, the standard
made the formatted stream output probably more compli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109358
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Well this is getting quite interesting. There is a bit of discussion going on
the Fortran Discourse about this.
https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/tab-formatting-with-stream-access/5466/47
After thinki
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109358
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109358
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109358
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
16 matches
Mail list logo
