--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19 16:30
---
No gfortran devleoper has hpux. Can you find some details about the error?
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19
16:50 ---
Confirmed, this also fails on powerpc-darwin.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCO
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19 19:16
---
It has never worked on HP-UX at least, see here, e.g.:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-05/msg00134.html
I have no idea why it would only fail at -O0 though, the .original dump on
i586-linux looks fi
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19
22:22 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I have no idea why it would only fail at -O0 though, the .original dump on
> i586-linux looks fine, and there's nothing strongly system specific in it.
This may be due to an unin
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19
22:28 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Does this also fail on 4.1 (which has the initialization fixes in)?
Yes as of last night at least.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-05-19 23:10 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/eoshift.f90 -O0 execution test
> > I have no idea why it would only fail at -O0 though, the .original dump on
> > i586-linux looks fine, and there's nothing strongl
--- Additional Comments From uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-27
16:05 ---
I'm seeing the failure on s390 as well. What appears to happen is that
the main program calls the library routine
static void
eoshift0 (gfc_array_char * ret, const gfc_array_char * array,
int sh
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13
22:37 ---
Subject: Bug 21594
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-13 22:37:40
Modified files:
libgfortran: ChangeLog
libgfortran/intrin
--- Additional Comments From uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-14
10:36 ---
A change like this:
static void
+eoshift0 (gfc_array_char * , const gfc_array_char *,
+ int, const char *, int);
+
+static void
eoshift0 (gfc_array_char * ret, const gfc_array_char * array,
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-22
11:41 ---
This can be made to fail on any architecture by increasing
the amount of shifting:
$ cat eoshift-really-fails.f90
program main
character(len=20) line
write (line,'(I4)') eoshift((/1, 3/), 1000)
end prog
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-23 20:22
---
Looks like Thomas indentified a whole bunch of problems in EOSHIFT ...
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-27
09:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=9157)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9157&action=view)
Patch fixing the issue with overwriting the target array.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-07
22:02 ---
Subject: Bug 21594
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-07 22:01:41
Modified files:
libgfortran: ChangeLog
libgfortran/m4 : e
13 matches
Mail list logo
