--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-14 19:26 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-12 16:52 ---
Subject: Bug 33542
Author: pault
Date: Fri Oct 12 16:51:53 2007
New Revision: 129268
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129268
Log:
2007-10-12 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-10-07 19:05 ---
Subject: Bug number PR33542
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg00372.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 04:49 ---
Reverted because of PR33646
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 04:45 ---
Subject: Bug 33542
Author: pault
Date: Thu Oct 4 04:45:41 2007
New Revision: 129000
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129000
Log:
2007-10-04 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-02 11:47 ---
Fixed on trunk under 'obvious' rule.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-02 11:45 ---
Subject: Bug 33542
Author: pault
Date: Tue Oct 2 11:45:11 2007
New Revision: 128954
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128954
Log:
2007-10-02 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-10-02 10:05 ---
Works as advertised without regression on PPC Darwin.
However there may be room for improvements for the error message:
pr33542.f90:24.9:
USE M1
1
Error: Ambiguous interfaces 'foo2' and 'foo2' in generic
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-30 16:53 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Re-reading the Fortran standard, I believe now that already "call foo(10)" is
> invalid (although it is not ambiguous).
In fact, I believe that the ambiguity in the interface is an error; th
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-24 20:55 ---
Re-reading the Fortran standard, I believe now that already "call foo(10)" is
invalid (although it is not ambiguous).
"Two or more accessible entities, other than generic interfaces or
defined operators, may have the
10 matches
Mail list logo
