[Bug fortran/52153] REAL128 gives extended precision, not quad precision

2018-01-24 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/52153] REAL128 gives extended precision, not quad precision

2016-07-26 Thread a.vogt at fulguritus dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153 Alexander Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a.vogt at fulguritus dot com --- Commen

[Bug fortran/52153] REAL128 gives extended precision, not quad precision

2013-08-12 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153 --- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #9) > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 08:08:18AM +, latlon90180+gcc_bugzilla at gmail > dot com wrote: > > Is there any progress on this? > > REAL128 of gfortran4.8

[Bug fortran/52153] REAL128 gives extended precision, not quad precision

2013-08-12 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153 --- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl --- On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 08:08:18AM +, latlon90180+gcc_bugzilla at gmail dot com wrote: > Is there any progress on this? > REAL128 of gfortran4.8 is still 10. > Need a short example. gfortran has supported

[Bug fortran/52153] REAL128 gives extended precision, not quad precision

2013-08-12 Thread latlon90180+gcc_bugzilla at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153 A. Kasahara changed: What|Removed |Added CC||latlon90180+gcc_bugzilla@gm

[Bug fortran/52153] REAL128 gives extended precision, not quad precision

2012-02-08 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl 2012-02-08 21:15:50 UTC --- On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:02:06PM +, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > --- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher 2012-02-08 > 21:02:06 UTC --- > Did this feature already exist in GC

[Bug fortran/52153] REAL128 gives extended precision, not quad precision

2012-02-08 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/52153] REAL128 gives extended precision, not quad precision

2012-02-08 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug fortran/52153] REAL128 gives extended precision, not quad precision

2012-02-07 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl 2012-02-07 22:39:48 UTC --- On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:52:39PM +, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153 > > --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl > 2012

[Bug fortran/52153] REAL128 gives extended precision, not quad precision

2012-02-07 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl 2012-02-07 21:52:39 UTC --- On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:26:01PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > > Yes, this is problem. > > So confirmed. > Yes, and I'm currently regression testing a patch (should be c

[Bug fortran/52153] REAL128 gives extended precision, not quad precision

2012-02-07 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/52153] REAL128 gives extended precision, not quad precision

2012-02-07 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co