http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54096
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54096
--- Comment #8 from badass at vt dot edu 2012-07-26 15:24:29 UTC ---
Thanks, will try with newer version of gcc on my end.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54096
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-07-26
14:52:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created attachment 27878 [details]
> source code
Compiles here (w/o errors) on x86-64-gnu-linux with
gcc version 4.5.3 20110428 [gcc-4_5-branch revision 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54096
--- Comment #6 from badass at vt dot edu 2012-07-26 14:13:52 UTC ---
Trying again. Source code attached.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54096
--- Comment #5 from badass at vt dot edu 2012-07-26 14:10:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 27878
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27878
source code
all files are modules except for prg_fwb.f90.
we believe the error segmentation fau
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54096
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-07-26
08:43:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Sorry about that, I though i had included the source code. I'm working
> on getting an updated compiler, but IT here is being difficult and I could
> take a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54096
--- Comment #3 from badass at vt dot edu 2012-07-25 23:42:16 UTC ---
Sorry about that, I though i had included the source code. I'm working
on getting an updated compiler, but IT here is being difficult and I could
take a day. Thanks for the help,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54096
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54096
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
